Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Striving to Work

Abstract

Using data from the 2011–2015 Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement, this study improves upon standard United States labor force measures to create three new measures which better capture the range of activities and attitudes that signal, at the individual level, an interest in work. When comparing the traditional employment-to-population ratio and the labor force participation rate with these new ‘striving to work’ measures, we find stark racial differences across measures. Hispanics have slightly higher odds of being employed or in the labor force than non-Hispanic whites, yet have similar odds of striving to work. Other vulnerable populations, including non-Hispanic blacks, non-Hispanic persons of other non-white races, females, and persons with disabilities, have significantly lower odds of participation in any of the five measures, compared to their comparison groups and controlling for other covariates. Policy implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Aaronson, S., Cajner, T., Fallick, B., Galbis-Reig, F., Smith, C. L., & Wascher, W. (2014). Labor force participation: Recent developments and future prospects. FRB of Cleveland working paper no. 14-10. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2495029.

  2. Addy, S. N. (2012). Toward a more comprehensive measure of labor underutilization: The Alabama case. Business Economics, 47(3), 2014–2227.

  3. Balakrishnan, R., Dao, M., Sole, J., & Zook, J. (2015). Lost workers. Finance and Development, 52, 36–39.

  4. Baum, S., & Mitchell, W. F. (2010). Labour underutilization and gender: Unemployment versus hidden unemployment. Population Research and Policy Review, 29, 233–248.

  5. Brucker, D. L., & Houtenville, A. J. (2015). People with disabilities in the United States. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(5), 771–774. doi:10.1016/apmr.2015.02.024.

  6. Brundage, V. (2014). Trends in unemployment and other labor market difficulties. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-3/pdf/trends-in-unemployment-and-other-labor-market-difficulties.pdf.

  7. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). (2017). How the government measures unemployment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.

  8. Card, D. (2011). Origins of the unemployment rate: The lasting legacy of measurement without theory. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 101(3), 552–557. doi:10.1257/aer.101.3.552.

  9. Dagsvik, J. K., Zhiyang, J., Kornstad, T., & Thoresen, T. O. (2014). Theoretical and practical arguments for modeling labor supply as a choice among latent jobs. Journal of Economic Surveys, 28(1), 134–151.

  10. Djamba, Y. K., & Kimuna, S. R. (2011). The labor force participation and earnings gap among African immigrant women in the U.S.A. International Migration and Integration. doi:10.1007/s12124-011-0218-0.

  11. Freeman, D. (2012). On (not) closing the gaps: The evolution of national and regional unemployment rates by race and ethnicity. Review of Black Political Economy, 39, 267–284.

  12. Fryer, R. G., Pager, D., & Spenkuch, J. L. (2011). Racial disparities in job finding and offered wages. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w17462.pdf.

  13. Haugen, S. E. (2009). Measures of labor underutilization from the current population survey. BLS working papers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.

  14. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2015a). Key indicators of the labour market (KILM) 2015: User guide. Geneva: ILO. http://www.ilo.org/global/statistics-and-databases/research-and-databases/kilm/WCMS_422091/lang–en/index.htm.

  15. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2015b). Disability inclusion and strategy and action plan. Geneva: ILO. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_emp/—ifp_skills/documents/genericdocument/wcms_370772.pdf.

  16. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2017). World employment social outlook. Geneva: ILO. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—dgreports/—dcomm/—publ/documents/publication/wcms_541211.pdf.

  17. Kessler Foundation. (2015). Kessler foundation national employment and disability survey. West Orange, NJ: Kessler Foundation. https://kesslerfoundation.org/sites/default/files/filepicker/5/KFSurvey15_Results-secured.pdf.

  18. Little, A. (2006). The spatial pattern of economic activity and inactivity in Britain: People or place effects. Lancaster: Lancaster University.

  19. Macartney, S., Bishaw, A., & Fontenot, K. (2013). Poverty rates for selected detailed race and Hispanic groups by state and place: 2007–2011. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/acsbr11-17.pdf.

  20. Sylla, N. S. (2013). Measuring labour absorption problems in developing countries: Limitations of the concept of unemployment. International Labour Review, 152(1), 27–41.

  21. U.S. Department of Labor. (2016a). A profile of the working poor, 2014. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Labor. http://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/working-poor/2014/home.htm.

  22. U.S. Department of Labor. (2016b). Economic news release. Table A-8. Employed persons by class of work and part-time status. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t08.htm.

  23. U.S. Department of Labor. (2016c). Labor force statistics from the Current Population Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm.

  24. U.S. Department of Labor. (2016d). Local area unemployment statistics: Alternative measures of labor underutilization for states, third quarter of 2015 through second quarter of 2016 averages. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/lau/stalt.htm.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for this article was provided by the Employment Policy and Measurement Rehabilitation Research and Training Center, which is funded by the Administration for Community Living’s National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), under Cooperative Agreement 90RT5037-01-00. The contents do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR and are not endorsed by the federal government (Edgar, 75.620 [b]). The authors are solely responsible for their opinions and any errors or omissions.

Author information

Correspondence to Debra L. Brucker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brucker, D.L., Rollins, N.G. & Houtenville, A.J. Striving to Work. Soc Indic Res 139, 541–558 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1730-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Employment
  • Labor force participation
  • Work