Advertisement

Patronage and Public Goods Provisioning in an Unequal Land

  • Hadia MajidEmail author
  • Rashid Memon
Original Research

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between economic and political inequalities and access to public goods provisioning in Pakistan. We construct measures of political inequality and political patronage using voting data, and economic inequality measures using representative household data. Firstly, we find a strong concave relationship between economic inequality and access to residential supply of natural gas. Secondly, we find that the presence of strong-men who can capture large vote shares is associated with higher access to natural gas. We uncover an optimal size of patrons: Patrons have an insignificant positive effect on access when patrons capture less than 20% of the votes and an insignificant negative effect when they capture more than 30%. At 20%, they have a positive effect that is significant in both a statistical and an economic sense.

Keywords

Horizontal inequality Ethnic inequality Publicly provided goods Political patronage 

JEL Classification

D63 I24 H42 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper was prepared under a grant administered by United Nations University UNU-WIDER. We are grateful to Maheen Javaid, Amna Naveed, and Syeda Warda Riaz for exceptional research assistance. We are also thankful to Rachel Gisselquist, Carla Canelas, Nishant Chaddha, two anonymous referees and to participants at the UNU-WIDER workshop for their comments and feedback.

Funding

This study was funded by UNU-WIDER (Grant number CP-59).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

We declare that there is no conflict of interest in the researching and writing of the paper “Patronage and public goods provisioning in an unequal land”.

References

  1. Alesina, A., Glaeser, E., & Sacerdote, B. (2001). Why doesn’t the US have a European-style welfare system? (No. w8524). National bureau of economic research.Google Scholar
  2. Alesina, A., Michalopoulos, S., & Papaioannou, E. (2012). Ethnic inequality. (NBER Working Paper No. 18512). Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research website:http://www.nber.org/papers/w18512.
  3. Alesina, A., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2011). Segregation and the quality of government in a cross section of countries. The American Economic Review, 101(5), 1872–1911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrabi, T., Das, J., & Khwaja, A. I. (2015). Report cards: The impact of providing school and child test scores on educational markets. (Policy Research Working Paper WPS 7226). Retrieved from World Bank Website http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/789721468191341184/pdf/WPS7226.pdf.
  5. Baldwin, K. (2013). Why vote with the chief? Political connections and public goods provision in Zambia. American Journal of Political Science, 57(4), 794–809.Google Scholar
  6. Baldwin, K., & Huber, J. D. (2010). Economic versus cultural differences: Forms of ethnic diversity and public goods provision. American Political Science Review, 104(4), 644–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banerjee, A., & Iyer, L. (2005). History, institutions, and economic performance: the legacy of colonial land tenure systems in India. The American Economic Review, 95(4), 1190–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banerjee, A., Iyer, L., & Somanathan, R. (2006). Public action for public goods. In T. Paul Schultz (Ed.), Handbook of agricultural economics, vol. 4 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  9. Bedard, K., & Ferrall, C. (2003). Wage and test score dispersion: some international evidence. Economics of Education Review, 22(1), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2005). Do cognitive test scores explain higher US wage inequality? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(1), 184–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burki, A. A., Memon, R., & Mir, K. (2015). Multiple Inequalities and Policies to Mitigate Inequality Traps in Pakistan. Department of Economics, Mushtaq Ahmad Gurmani School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Lahore University of Management Sciences.Google Scholar
  12. Cheema, A., Naqvi, A. A., & Siddiqi, B. (2012). Land rights and long-run development: Evidence from Pakistan. Available online at https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=CSAE2013&paper_id=974. Accessed 25 Jan 2017.
  13. Cheema, A., & Naseer, F. (2010). Poverty, mobility and institutions in rural Sargodha: evidence for social protection reform. Report submitted to the Planning and Development Department (P&DD) of the Government of Punjab.Google Scholar
  14. Cheema, A., & Naseer, M. F. (2013). Historical inequality and intergenerational educational mobility: The dynamics of change in rural Punjab. The Lahore Journal of Economics, 18, 211. (special edition).Google Scholar
  15. Deiwiks, C., Cederman, L. E., & Gleditsch, K. S. (2012). Inequality and conflict in federations. Journal of Peace Research, 49(2), 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deshpande, A. (2000). Does caste still define disparity? A look at inequality in Kerala, India. The American Economic Review, 90(2), 322–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Di Cesare, M., Bhatti, Z., Soofi, S. B., Fortunato, L., Ezzati, M., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2015). Geographical and socioeconomic inequalities in women and children’s nutritional status in Pakistan in 2011: An analysis of data from a nationally representative survey. The Lancet Global Health, 3(4), e229–e239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferreira, F. H. (2001). Education for the masses? The interaction between wealth, educational and political inequalities. Economics of Transition, 9(2), 533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haq, R., & Arshid, N. (2009). Inequality and welfare by food expenditure components. Pakistan Development Review, 48(4 Part II), 755–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacoby, H., & Mansuri, G. (2011). Crossing boundaries: Gender, caste and schooling in rural Pakistan. (Policy Research Working Paper WPS 5710). Retrieved from World Bank website http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/941421468073730366/pdf/WPS5710.pdf.
  21. Jamal, H. (2006). Does inequality matter for poverty reduction? Evidence from Pakistan’s poverty trends. The Pakistan Development Review, 45(3), 439–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kanbur, R., & Venables, A. J. (2003, October). Spatial inequality and development. In Introduction to an edited volume of papers from the Cornell-LSE-WIDER conference on Spatial Inequality and Development.Google Scholar
  23. Kemal, A. R., Irfan, M., & Mahmood, N. (2003). Population of Pakistan: an analysis of 1998 population and housing census. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad.Google Scholar
  24. Khwaja, A. I. (2009). Can good projects succeed in bad communities? Journal of Public Economics, 93(7), 899–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lessmann, C. (2014). Spatial inequality and development—is there an inverted-U relationship? Journal of Development Economics, 106, 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lizzeri, A., & Persico, N. (2001). The provision of public goods under alternative electoral incentives. American Economic Review, 91(1), 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luttmer, E. F., & Singhal, M. (2011). Culture, context, and the taste for redistribution. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(1), 157–179.Google Scholar
  28. Manzetti, L., & Wilson, C. J. (2007). Why do corrupt governments maintain public support? Comparative Political Studies, 40(8), 949–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Memon, R. (2013). Wage Discrimination in Pakistan’s Labor Markets: The Impact of Ethnicity. Mimeo. Lahore University of Management Sciences.Google Scholar
  30. Mohmand, S., & Gazdar, H. (2007). Social structures in rural Pakistan. Thematic paper prepared under TA4319, Determinants and Drivers of Poverty Reduction and ADB’s Contribution in Rural Pakistan. ADB, Islamabad.Google Scholar
  31. Munshi, J. (2014). A Method for Constructing Likert Scales. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2419366. Accessed 01 Oct 2016.
  32. Powell, J. D. (1970). Peasant society and clientelist politics. American Political Science Review, 64(2), 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rao, V. (2006). On “Inequality Traps” and Development Policy (No. 9588). Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  34. Sen, A. K. (1980). Equality of what? In S. McMurrin (Ed.), Tanner lectures on human values. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Stewart, F. (Ed.). (2008). Horizontal inequalities and conflict: Understanding group violence in multiethnic societies. Houndsmills: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  36. Stewart, F., & Langer, A. (2008). Horizontal Inequalities: Explaining Persistence and Change. In F. Stewart (Ed.), Horizontal Inequalities and Conflict: Understanding Group Violence in Multiethnic Societies (pp. 54–82). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Tilly, C. (1999). Durable inequality. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. Wantchekon, L. (2003). Clientelism and voting behavior: Evidence from a field experiment in Benin. World Politics, 55(3), 399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilkinson, R. G. (1996). Unhealthy societies: The afflictions of inequality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© UNU-WIDER 2017 2017
corrected publication February 2019

Open AccessThis book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the UNU-WIDER, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon this book or a part thereof, you must distribute your contributions under the same licence as the original.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsLahore University of Management SciencesLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations