Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 138, Issue 3, pp 925–951 | Cite as

Vulnerability to Poverty: Tajikistan During and After the Global Financial Crisis

  • Ira N. Gang
  • Kseniia Gatskova
  • John Landon-Lane
  • Myeong-Su Yun
Article

Abstract

We use a new formal, practical, and easily decomposable measure to examine vulnerability to poverty in Tajikistan during the global financial crisis. Our strategy is to estimate a first-order Markov model of household expenditure with the aim of identifying the vulnerability of households to poverty. We use Bayesian methods which allow us to estimate the limiting expenditure distribution. Importantly, by introducing the index of vulnerability as the weighted probability of a household falling into poverty over a given time horizon, we can use the estimated dynamics to assess short, medium and long-run vulnerability. We find that during the “recession transition” almost all households were vulnerable to poverty while almost none were during the “recovery period”. Overall, urban households, more educated households and households receiving remittances from international labor migrants were less vulnerable to poverty. While households with a current or very recent migrant did not have a significantly lower measured vulnerability to poverty, those households receiving remittances from migrants had a lower vulnerability to poverty. Our findings stress that the international labor migration from Tajikistan may not be a reliable means of welfare security for households because external economic shocks and internal political decisions can negatively affect the Russian economy and lead to a reduction of remittance flows to Tajikistan.

Keywords

Mobility measurement Vulnerability Poverty Inequality Measurement Tajikistan 

JEL Classification

J60 D63 I32 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Ilhom Abdulloev and Melanie Khamis for long conversations on this material, and IOS-Regensburg for the data. An earlier version was presented at the UNU-WIDER Conference: Inequality-Measurement, Trends, Impacts, and Policies, 5–6 September 2014, Helsinki, Finland. Myeong-Su Yun’s work is supported by Inha University Research Grant (INHA-55452).

References

  1. Abdulloev, I., Gang, I. N., & Yun, M. S. (2014). Migration, education and the gender gap in labour force participation. European Journal of Development Research, 26(4), 509–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelillo, N. (2014). Vulnerability to poverty in China: A subjective poverty line approach. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 12(4), 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buckley, C., & Hofmann, E. T. (2012). Are remittances an effective mechanism for development? Evidence from Tajikistan, 1999–2007. Journal of Development Studies, 48(8), 1121–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cahyadi, E. R., & Waibel, H. (2015). Contract farming and vulnerability to poverty among oil palm smallholders in Indonesia. The Journal of Development Studies. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2015.1098627.Google Scholar
  5. Cappellari, L., & Jenkins, S. P. (2004). Modelling low income transitions. Journal of applied econometrics, 19(5), 593–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Celidoni, M. (2013). Vulnerability to poverty: An empirical comparison of alternative measures. Applied Economics, 45(12), 1493–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Celidoni, M. (2015). Decomposing vulnerability to poverty. Review of Income and Wealth, 61(1), 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Celidoni, M., & Procidano, I. (2015). Identification precision of vulnerability to poverty indexes: Does information quantity matter? Social Indicators Research, 121(1), 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Champernowne, D. G. (1953). A model of income distribution. Economic Journal, 63(250), 318–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaudhuri, S. (2003). Assessing vulnerability to poverty: Concepts, empirical methods and illustrative examples. Department of Economics, Columbia University, New York. Accessed 25 April 2017 http://econdse.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/vulnerability-assessment.pdf.
  11. Co, C. Y., Landon-Lane, J. S., & Yun, M.-S. (2006). Inter-state dynamics of invention activities, 1930–2000. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21(8), 1111–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dang, H. A., & Lanjouw, P. (2014). Welfare dynamics measurement: two definitions of a vulnerability line and their empirical application. World Bank policy research working paper, (6944). http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6944. Accessed 13 December 2015.
  13. Dang, H. A. H., & Lanjouw, P. F. (2016). Welfare dynamics measurement: Two definitions of a vulnerability line and their empirical application. Review of Income and Wealth. doi: 10.1111/roiw.12237.Google Scholar
  14. Dang, H. A., Lanjouw, P., Luoto, J., & McKenzie, D. (2014). Using repeated cross-sections to explore movements into and out of poverty. Journal of Development Economics, 107(March), 112–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Danzer, A. M., Dietz, B., & Gatskova, K. (2013a). Tajikistan household panel survey: Migration, remittances and the labor market: Survey report. IOS-Regensburg. http://www.ios-regensburg.de/fileadmin/doc/VW_Project/Booklet-TJ-web.pdf. Accessed 05 December 2014.
  16. Danzer, A. M., Dietz, B., & Gatskova, K. (2013b). Migration and remittances in Tajikistan: Survey technical report. http://ideas.repec.org/p/ost/wpaper/327.html. Accessed 05 December 2014.
  17. Danzer, A. M., & Ivaschenko, O. (2010). Migration patterns in a remittances dependent economy: Evidence from Tajikistan during the global financial crisis. Migration Letters, 7(2), 190–202.Google Scholar
  18. Deaton, A. (1997). The analysis of household surveys: A microeconometric approach to development policy. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. http://go.worldbank.org/UWQRT802H0. Accessed 13 December 2015.
  19. Dimova, R., Gang, I. N., & Landon-Lane, J. S. (2006). The informal sector during crisis and transition. In B. Guha-Khasnobis & B. Kanbur (Eds.), Informal labour markets and development (pp. 88–108). New York: Palgrave-McMillan Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dutta, I., Foster, J., & Mishra, A. (2011). On measuring vulnerability to poverty. Social Choice and Welfare, 37(4), 743–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaiha, R., Imai, K. S., & Kang, W. (2011). Vulnerability and poverty dynamics in Vietnam. Applied Economics, 43(25), 3603–3618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gang, I. N., Landon-Lane, J. S., & Yun, M.-S. (2002). Gender differences in German upward income mobility. Schmollers Jahrbuch: Journal of Applied Social Science Studies/Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Sozialwissenschaften, 123(1), 3–14.Google Scholar
  23. Gang, I. N., Landon-Lane, J. S., & Yun, M.-S. (2004). Good and bad mobility: A note on directional mobility measures. Mimeo: Department of Economics, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  24. Gang, I. N., Landon-Lane, J., & Yun, M.-S. (2009). Measuring income assimilation of migrants to Germany. Schmollers Jahrbuch: Journal of Applied Social Science Studies/Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Sozialwissenschaften, 129(2), 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Geweke, J. (2005). Contemporary Bayesian econometrics and statistics. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Geweke, J., Marshall, R. C., & Zarkin, G. A. (1986a). Mobility indices in continuous time Markov chains. Econometrica, 54(6), 1407–1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geweke, J., Marshall, R. C., & Zarkin, G. A. (1986b). Exact inference for continuous time Markov chain models. Review of Economic Studies, 53(4), 653–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. IMF. (2012). International Monetary Fund. Republic of Tajikistan: Poverty reduction strategy paper. IMF country report no. 12/33. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2012/cr1233.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2016.
  29. IMF. (2016). International Monetary Fund. Primary commodity prices. Monthly data. http://www.imf.org/external/np/res/commod/index.aspx. Accessed 2 February 2016.
  30. Jha, R., Dang, T., & Tashrifov, Y. (2010). Economic vulnerability and poverty in Tajikistan. Economic Change and Restructuring, 43(2), 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Klasen, S., & Waibel, H. (Eds.). (2013). Vulnerability to poverty. Theory, measurement and determinants. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Kruy, N., Kim, D., & Kakinaka, M. (2010). Poverty and vulnerability: An examination of chronic and transient poverty in Cambodia. International Area Review, 13(4), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marat, E. (2009). Labor migration in Central Asia: Implications of the global economic crisis. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute. Silk road paper, May 2009. http://www.isdp.eu/images/stories/isdp-main-pdf/2009_marat_labor-migration-in-central-asia.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2015.
  34. Mina, C. D., & Imai, K. S. (2016). Estimation of vulnerability to poverty using a multilevel longitudinal model: Evidence from the Philippines. The Journal of Development Studies. http://www.rieb.kobe-u.ac.jp/academic/ra/dp/English/DP2016-16.pdf.
  35. Naudé, W., Santos-Paulino, A. U., & McGillivray, M. (2009). Measuring vulnerability: An overview and introduction. Oxford Development Studies, 37(3), 183–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Prais, S. (1955). Measuring social mobility. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 118(1), 56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ratha, D., Mohapatra, S., Silwal, A. (2009). Outlook for remittance flows 2009–2011: Remittances expected to fall by 7–10 percent in 2009. Migration and development brief 10. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  38. Shorrocks, A. F. (1976). Income mobility and the markov assumption. Economic Journal, 86(343), 566–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shorrocks, A. (1978a). Income inequality and income mobility. Journal of Economic Theory, 19(2), 376–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shorrocks, A. F. (1978b). The measurement of mobility. Econometrica, 46(5), 1013–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tajikistan in Figures. (2010). Agency of statistics under president of the Republic of Tajikistan. http://www.stat.tj/ru/img/9f5268b192177e16d1066c1e16aea04a_1287832044.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2016.
  42. UNDP. (2008). United Nations Development Programme. National human development report: Russian Federation. Russia facing demographic challenges. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/nhdr_russia_2008_eng.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2016.
  43. UNDP. (2010). United Nations Development Programme. National Human development report 2008–2009. Tajikistan. Employment in the context of human development. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/tajikistan2009_eng.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2016.
  44. Verma, V., Betti, G., & Gagliardi, F. (2017). Fuzzy measures of longitudinal poverty in a comparative perspective. Social Indicators Research, 130(2), 435–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. World Bank. (2009). Republic of Tajikistan poverty assessment: Report no. 51341-TJ. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/3159 Accessed 20 December 2015.
  46. World Bank. (2015). World development indicators database. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/views/variableselection/selectvariables.aspx?source=world-development-indicators. Accessed 20 February 2015.
  47. Zhang, Y., & Wan, G. (2009). How precisely can we estimate vulnerability to poverty? Oxford Development Studies, 37(3), 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA
  2. 2.IOS–RegensburgRegensburgGermany
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsInha UniversityIncheonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations