Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 138, Issue 3, pp 1049–1074 | Cite as

Socioeconomic Status Mobility in the Modern World System: Growth and Allocation Effects

  • Shawn F. Dorius
Article
  • 187 Downloads

Abstract

This research introduces a new measure of the socioeconomic status (SES) of countries to test assertions regarding a contemporary world-system in which mobility is scarce or altogether absent. Historical, country-level estimates of population size, income per capita, and educational attainment were used to construct a new time-series measure of SES for a constant panel of 74 countries and a larger, partially imputed panel of 149 countries. Correlation and contingency table analysis show that SES position in 2010 was highly dependent on 1880 position, though the degree of observed immobility is sensitive to the number of status categories and number of countries. The long-run trend has been toward greater mobility and a more open global stratification system that coincides with recent declines in between-nation income and education inequality. Although most high- and low-SES countries in 1880 were in the same category in 2010, countries in the middle of the 1880 global status hierarchy were exceptionally mobile over the ensuing 130 years. Population dynamics have played a fundamental role in structuring the global status hierarchy. Low population growth among high-SES countries, coupled with high population growth among low-SES countries, has contributed to substantial expansion and diversification of the high status club, which currently includes a large and growing number of non-western countries.

Keywords

Mobility Socioeconomic status Globalization World system Population dynamics Measurement 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Training Grant from the Population Studies Center at the University of Michigan (T32 HD007339) and funding from the Population Studies Center small grant initiative.

References

  1. Arrighi, G. (2010). The long twentieth century: Money, power, and the origins of our times. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Babones, S. (2013). Methods for quantitative macro-comparative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. (2010). A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. NBER working paper no. 15902.Google Scholar
  4. Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. The Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barro, R. J., Sala-i-Martin, X., Blanchard, O. J., & Hall, R. E. (1991). Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 22(1), 107–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benavot, A., & Riddle, P. (1988). The expansion of primary education, 1870–1940: Trends and issues. Sociology of Education, 61, 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhalla, S. S. (2002). Imagine there’s no country: Poverty, inequality and growth in the era of globalization. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  8. Bourguignon, F., & Morrison, C. (2002). Inequality among world citizens: 1820–1992. The American Economic Review, 92, 727–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, R. (2010). World-system mobility and economic growth, 1980–2000. Social Forces, 88, 1123–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, R. (2011). World income inequality in the global era: New estimates, 1990–2008. Social Problems, 58, 565–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, Rob. (2016). Examining mobility in international development. Social Problems, 63, 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, D., & Soto, M. (2007). Growth and human capital: Good data, good results. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Spreading the wealth. Foreign Affairs, 81(1), 120–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dorius, S. F. (2008). Global demographic convergence? A reconsideration of changing intercountry inequality in fertility. Population and Development Review, 34, 519–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dorius, S. F. (2013). The rise and fall of worldwide education inequality from 1870–2010: Measurement and trends. Sociology of Education, 86(2), 158–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dorius, S. F., & Firebaugh, G. (2010). Trends in global gender inequality. Social Forces, 88(5), 1941–1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Easterlin, R. A. (2000). The worldwide standard of living since 1800. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J. (1985). Are American rates of social mobility exceptionally high? New evidence on an old issue. European Sociological Review, 1, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Firebaugh, G. (2003). The new geography of global income inequality. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Firebaugh, G., & Goesling, B. (2004). Accounting for the recent decline in global income inequality. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 283–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frank, A. G. (1978). Dependent accumulation and underdevelopment. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  23. Goesling, B., & Baker, D. P. (2008). Three faces of international inequality. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 26(2), 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goesling, B., & Firebaugh, G. (2004). The trend in international health inequality. Population and Development Review, 30, 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hirsch, F. (1995). Social limits to growth. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  26. Isaacs, J. B., Sawhill, I. V., & Haskins, R. (2008). Getting ahead or losing ground: Economic mobility in America. Washton, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  27. Kim, S., & Shin, E. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of globalization and regionalization in international trade: A social network approach. Social Forces, 81, 445–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Korzeniewicz, Roberto Patricio, & Moran, Timothy Patrick. (1997). World-economic trends in the distribution of income, 1965–1992. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 1000–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Korzeniewicz, R. P., & Moran, T. P. (2012). Unveiling inequality: A world-historic perspective. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  30. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45, 1–28.Google Scholar
  31. Lynn, F. B., Podolny, J. M., & Tao, L. (2009). A sociological (de) construction of the relationship between status and quality. American Journal of Sociology, 115(3), 755–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maddison, A. (2004). The world economy: Historical Statistics. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  33. Mahutga, M. C. (2006). The persistence of structural inequality? A network analysis of international trade, 1965–2000. Social Forces, 84, 1863–1889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meyer, J., Boli, J., Thomas, G., & Ramirez, F. (1997). World society and the nation-state. The American Journal of Sociology, 103, 144–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meyer, W., Ramirez, F., Rubinson, R., & Boli, J. (1977). The world education revolution, 1950–1970. Sociology of Education, 50, 242–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meyer, J., Ramirez, F., & Soysal, Y. (1992). World expansion of mass education, 1870–1980. Sociology of Education, 65, 128–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Milanovic, B. (2005). Worlds apart: Measuring international and global inequality (pp. 1–27, 139–148). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Morrison, C., & Murtin, F. (2009). The century of education. Journal of Human Capital, 3, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nam, C. B., & Boyd, M. (2004). Occupational status in 2000: Over a century of census-based measurement. Population Research and Policy Review, 23(4), 327–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nam, C. B., & Powers, M. G. (1968). Changes in the relative status of workers in the United States, 1950—1960. Social Forces, 47, 158–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nielsen, F., & Alderson, A. S. (1997). The Kuznets Curve and the Great U-Turn: Income inequality in U.S. counties, 1970 to 1990. American Sociological Review, 62(1), 12–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Powers, D. A., & Xie, Y. (2008). Statistical methods for categorical data analysis. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  43. Sala-i-Martin, X. (2006). The world distribution of income: Falling poverty and… convergence, period. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 351–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sauder, M., Lynn, F. B., & Podolny, J. (2012). Status: Insights from organizational sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schumpeter, J. A. (1994) [1942]. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Snyder, D., & Kick, E. L. (1979). Structural position in the world system and economic growth, 1955–1970: A multiple-network analysis of transnational interactions. American Journal of Sociology, 84(5), 1096–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tam, T., & Jiang, J. (2014). The making of higher education inequality: How do mechanisms and pathways depend on competition? American Sociological Review, 79(4), 807–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thornton, A. (2005). Reading history sideways: The fallacy and enduring impact of the developmental paradigm on family life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. Thornton, A., Dorius, S. F., & Swindle, J. (2015). Developmental idealism: The cultural foundations of world development programs. Sociology of Development, 1, 277–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wade, R. H. (2004). Is globalization reducing poverty and inequality? World Development, 32(4), 567–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wallerstein, Immanuel. (1974). The rise and future demise of the world capitalist system: Concepts for comparative analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16, 387–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wallerstein, I. (1979). The capitalist world-economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-systems analysis: An Introduction. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Wilson, C. (2001). On the scale of global demographic convergence 1950–2000. Population and Development Review, 27(1), 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations