Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 138, Issue 1, pp 45–60 | Cite as

Importance Weighting in Client Satisfaction Measures: Lessons from the Life Satisfaction Literature

  • Chang-ming HsiehEmail author
Article

Abstract

This article examines the role of perceived importance of service elements, or importance weighting, in client satisfaction measures. Drawing on the debate over importance weighting in the life satisfaction literature, this article assesses the adequacy of and the need for importance weighting in client satisfaction measures. Based on a client satisfaction survey (N = 156), the current study explored (1) whether or not all service elements of homecare services were considered equally important, and (2) whether or not the relationships between overall satisfaction with homecare services and satisfaction with various service elements of homecare services varied significantly across perceived importance of service elements. Findings showed that (1) not all service elements of homecare services were considered equally important, and (2) relationships between overall satisfaction with homecare services and satisfaction with various service elements of homecare services varied significantly across perceived importance of service elements. The findings support the incorporation of perceived importance of service elements into client satisfaction measures.

Keywords

Client satisfaction Consumer satisfaction Measurement development Survey 

References

  1. Aberson, C. L. (2010). Applied power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perception of life quality. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett, L. F. (2006). Valence is a basic building block of emotional life. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bollen, K. A., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rogers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russel Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Carifio, L., & Perla, R. (2008). Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Medical Education, 42, 1150–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In R. H. Hole (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 307–341). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Chou, S. C., Boldy, D. P., & Lee, A. H. (2001). Measuring resident satisfaction in residential aged care. The Gerontologist, 41, 623–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, P., Cohen, J., Teresi, J., Marchi, M., & Velez, C. N. (1990). Problems in the measurement of latent variables in structural equations casual models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evans, M. G. (1991). The problem of analyzing multiplicative composites: Interactions revisited. American Psychologist, 46, 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferrans, C. E. (1990). Development of a quality of life index for patients with cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 17, 15–19.Google Scholar
  16. Ferrans, C., & Powers, M. (1985). Quality of life index: Development and psychometric properties. Advances in Nursing Science, 8, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guardiola, J., & Picazo-Tadeo, A. J. (2014). Building weighted-domain composite indices of life satisfaction with data envelopment analysis. Social Indicators Research, 117, 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hsieh, C. M. (2003). Counting importance: The case of life satisfaction and relative domain importance. Social Indicators Research, 61, 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hsieh, C. M. (2004). Income and financial satisfaction among older adults in the United States. Social Indicators Research, 66, 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hsieh, C. M. (2006). Using client satisfaction to improve case management services for the elderly. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 605–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hsieh, C. M. (2009). Importance counts: The role of relative importance of service elements in client satisfaction measures. Journal of Social Service Research, 35, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hsieh, C. M. (2012a). Incorporating perceived importance of service elements into client satisfaction measures. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hsieh, C. M. (2012b). Perceived importance of service elements in client satisfaction measures. Journal of Social Services Research, 38, 529–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hsieh, C. M. (2012c). Should we give up domain importance weighting in QoL measures? Social Indicators Research, 108, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hsieh, C. M. (2013). Issues in evaluating importance weighting in quality of life measures. Social Indicators Research, 110, 681–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hsieh, C. M. (2014). Beyond multiplication: Incorporating importance into client satisfaction measures. Research on Social Work Practice, 24, 470–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hsieh, C. M. (2015). The often overlooked issue of statistical power: This and other issues regarding assessing importance weighting in quality of life measurements. Social Science Research, 50, 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hsieh, C. M. (2016). Domain importance in subjective well-being measures. Social Indicators Research, 127, 777–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hsieh, C. M., & Essex, E. (2006). Measuring client satisfaction among older adults and families. In B. Berkman (Ed.), Handbook of social work in health and aging (pp. 1009–1017). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hsieh, C. M., & Kenagy, G. P. (2014). Measuring quality of life: A case for re-examining the assessment of domain importance weighting. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9, 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Inglehart, R. (1978). Value priorities, life satisfaction, and political dissatisfaction among western publics. Comparative Studies in Sociology, 1, 173–202.Google Scholar
  32. Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: How to (ab)use them. Medical Education, 38, 1212–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuzon, W. M., Urbanchek, M. G., & McCabe, S. (1996). The seven deadly sins of statistical analysis. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 37, 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 331–348.Google Scholar
  35. Locke, E. A. (1969). What is job satisfaction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 309–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297–1349). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  37. Locke, E. A. (1984). Job satisfaction. In M. Gruneberg & T. Wall (Eds.), Social psychology and organizational behavior (pp. 93–117). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Mastekaasa, A. (1984). Multiplicative and additive models of job and life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 14, 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McCullaugh, P. (1980). Regression models for ordinal data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 42, 109–142.Google Scholar
  40. McFarlin, D. B., Coster, E. A., Rice, R. W., & Coopper-Alison, T. (1995). Facet importance and job satisfaction: Another look at the range of affect hypothesis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McFarlin, D. B., & Rice, R. W. (1992). The role of facet importance as a moderator in job satisfaction processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nguyen, T. D., Attkisson, C. C., & Stegner, B. L. (1983). Assessment of patient satisfaction: Development and refinement of a service evaluation questionnaire. Evaluation and Program Planning, 16, 109–118.Google Scholar
  43. Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Science Education, 15, 625–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pell, G. (2005). Uses and misuses of Likert scales. Medical Education, 39, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Philip, E. J., Merluzzi, T. V., Peterman, A., & Cronk, L. B. (2009). Measurement accuracy in assessing patient’s quality of life: To weight or not to weight domains of quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 18, 775–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reid, P. H., & Gundlach, J. H. (1983). A scale for the measurement of consumer satisfaction with social services. Journal of Social Service Research, 7, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rice, R. W., Gentile, D. A., & McFarlin, D. B. (1991a). Facet importance and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rice, R. W., Markus, K., Moyer, R. P., & McFarlin, D. B. (1991b). Facet importance and job satisfaction: Two experimental tests of Locke’s range of affect hypothesis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1977–1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rojas, M. (2006). Life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life: Is it a simple relationship? Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 467–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ruggeri, M., & Greenfield, T. K. (1995). The Italian version of the service satisfaction scale (SSS-30) adapted for community based psychiatric patients: Development, factor analysis and application. Evaluation and Program Planning, 18, 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Russell, L. B., & Hubley, A. M. (2005). Importance ratings and weighting: Old concerns and new perspectives. International Journal of Testing, 5, 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Russell, L. B., Hubley, A. M., Palepu, A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2006). Does weighting capture what’s important? Revisiting subjective importance weighting with a quality of life measure. Social Indicators Research, 75, 146–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ryff, C. D., & Essex, M. J. (1992). The interpretation of life experience and well-being: The sample case of relocation. Psychology and Aging, 7, 507–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized quasi-experimental inference (2nd ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  56. Solomon, R. C., & Stone, L. D. (2002). On “positive” and “negative” emotions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 32, 417–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684), 677–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 249–288). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  59. Taylor, S., & Thompson, S. (1982). Stalking the elusive vividness effect. Psychological Review, 89, 155–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tiefenbach, T., & Kohlbacher, F. (2015). Individual differences in the relationship between domain satisfaction and happiness: The moderating role of domain importance. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 82–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Williams, I. J., & Brown, B. K. (1994). Method variance in organizational behavior and human resources research: Effects on correlations, path coefficients, and hypothesis testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 57, 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wu, C. H. (2008a). Can we weight satisfaction score with importance ranks across life domains? Social Indicators Research, 86, 468–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wu, C. H. (2008b). Examining the appropriateness of importance weighting on satisfaction score from range-of-affect hypothesis: Hierarchical linear modeling for within-subject data. Social Indicators Research, 86, 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wu, C. H., Chen, L. H., & Tsai, Y. M. (2009). Investigating importance weighting of satisfaction scores from a formative model with partial least squares analysis. Social Indicators Research, 90, 351–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. G. (2006a). Do we need to weight item satisfaction by item importance? A perspective from Locke’s range-of-affect hypothesis. Social Indicators Research, 79, 485–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. G. (2006b). Do we need to weight satisfaction scores with importance ratings in measuring quality of life? Social Indicators Research, 78, 305–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. G. (2007). Importance has been considered in satisfaction evaluation: An experimental examination of Locke’s range-of-affect hypothesis. Social Indicators Research, 81, 521–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jane Addams College of Social Work, University of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations