Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 138, Issue 2, pp 793–807 | Cite as

The Link Between Political Participation and Life Satisfaction: A Three Wave Causal Analysis of the German SOEP Household Panel

  • André Pirralha
Article

Abstract

Is there a relationship between political participation and individual life satisfaction? The idea that political participation makes people more satisfied with their lives has long been debated. However, the existing empirical research has not been very successful in demonstrating that such a relationship exists while some studies show that instead it is individual life satisfaction that impacts political participation. This paper aims to shed some light on the issue of causality between political participation and individual life satisfaction. Unlike former studies, we resort to panel data and apply a three wave model which allows us great flexibility to test several hypotheses. Also unlike previous studies, after correcting for measurement error, our analysis shows no compelling evidence of a causal relationship between political participation and life satisfaction.

Keywords

Life satisfaction Political participation Political science Causality 

References

  1. Aldrich, J. (1993). Rational Choice and Turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alwin, D. F. (2007). Margins of error: A study of reliability in survey measurement. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow, K. J. (1950). A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 58(4), 328–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes, S., Farah, B., & Heunks, F. (1979a). Personal dissatisfaction. In S. Barnes, M. Kaase, et al. (Eds.), Political action: Mass participation in five western democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Barnes, S., Kaase, M., et al. (1979b). Political action: Mass participation in five western democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Bentler, P., & Chou, P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modelling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Claassen, R. L. (2008). Testing the reciprocal effects of campaign participation. Political Behavior, 30(3), 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R., & Smith, H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dorn, D., Fischer, J. A. V., Kirchgassner, G., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2008). Direct democracy and life satisfaction revisited: New evidence for Switzerland. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 227–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Finkel, S. (1985). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 891–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data (p. 105). Thousand Oaks: Sage. QASS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finkel, S. E. (2007). Linear panel analysis. In S. Menard (Ed.), Handbook of longitudinal research: Design, measurement, and analysis. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  15. Flavin, P., & Keane, M. (2012). Life satisfaction and political participation: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(1), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frey, B. S., Benz, M., & Stutzer, A. (2004). Introducing procedural utility: Not only what, but also how matters. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160, 377–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Headey, B., & Muffels, R. (2014). Two-way causation in life satisfaction research: Structural equation models with granger-causation. IZA Discussion Paper No. 8665, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
  18. Ikeda, K., Kobayashi, T., & Hoshimoto, M. (2008). Does political participation make a difference? The relationship between political choice, civic engagement and political efficacy. Electoral Studies, 27, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2005). LISREL 8.57. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Kessler, R., & Greenberg, D. (1981). Linear Panel Analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lane, R. E. (1988). Procedural goods in a democracy: How one is treated versus what one gets. Social Justice Research, 2, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oishi, S., Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2007). The optimal level of well-being: Can we be too happy? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 346–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pacheco, G., & Lange, T. (2010). Political participation and life satisfaction: A cross-European analysis. International Journal of Social Economics, 37(10), 686–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Petrescu, M. (2013). Marketing research using single-item indicators in structural equation models. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 1, 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Quintelier, E., & Hooghe, M. (2012). Political attitudes and political participation: A panel study on socialization and self-selection effects among late adolescents. International Political Science Review, 33(1), 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Riker, W., & Ordeshook, P. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62(1), 25–42.Google Scholar
  30. Saris, W. E., & Gallhofer, I. N. (2007). Design, evaluation, and analysis of questionnaires for survey research. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & van der Veld, W. (2009). Testing structural equation models or detection of misspecifications? Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 561–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saris, W., Oberski, D., Revilla, M., Zavala-Rojas, D., Lilleoja, L., Gallhofer, I. N., & Gruner, T. (2011). The development of the program SQP 2.0 for the prediction of the quality of survey questions. RECSM Working Paper 24. Available at: https://www.upf.edu/documents/3966940/3986764/RECSM_wp024.pdf.
  33. Schimmack, U. (2009). Wellbeing: Measuring wellbeing in the SOEP. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 129, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stadelmann-Steffen, I., & Vatter, A. (2012). Does satisfaction with democracy really increase happiness? Direct democracy and individual satisfaction in Switzerland. Political Behavior, 34(3), 539–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2006). Political participation and procedural utility: An empirical study. European Journal of Political Research, 45, 391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Talò, C., & Mannarini, T. (2015). Measuring participation: Development and validation the participatory behaviors scale. Social Indicators Research, 123(3), 799–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Teorell, J. (2006). Political participation and three theories of democracy: A research inventory and agenda. European Journal of Political Research, 45, 787–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) (2011). ISCED: International Standard Classification of Education. http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Pages/international-standard-classification-of-education.aspx.
  39. van der Veld, W., Saris, W. E., & Satorra, A. (2008). Judgement rule aid for structural equation models version 3.0.4 beta.Google Scholar
  40. Veenhoven, R. (1988). The utility of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 20(4), 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2007). The german socio-economic panel study (SOEP)—Scope, evolution and enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 127(1), 139–169.Google Scholar
  42. Warren, M. (1992). Democratic theory and self-transformation. American Political Science Review, 86, 8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weitz-Shapiro, R., & Winters, M. S. (2011). The link between voting and life satisfaction in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 53(4), 101–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research and Expertise Centre for Survey MethodologyUniversitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations