Social Indicators Research

, Volume 137, Issue 3, pp 1119–1143 | Cite as

Which Inequality Makes People Dissatisfied with Their Lives? Evidence of the Link Between Life Satisfaction and Inequalities

  • Laura Ravazzini
  • Florian Chávez-JuárezEmail author


This paper aims at establishing a clear link between different types of inequality and life satisfaction in Europe. We analyse the relationship between life satisfaction and both income inequality and inequality of opportunity using seven waves of the European Social Survey. The results show that in Europe both income inequality and inequality of opportunity reduce people’s life satisfaction. Our main results suggest that all socio-economic groups are dissatisfied with income inequality, whereas primarily low socio-economic individuals worry about inequality of opportunity. We find that expected mobility is very important in explaining the link between inequality and life satisfaction for all socio-economic groups in Europe. We advance the hypothesis that life satisfaction is conditioned by a mix of normative arguments against inequality and by the fear/possibility to lose/gain a good social position. This result complements findings on the mediating role of social mobility in the relationship with subjective well-being.


Subjective well-being Income inequality Inequality of opportunity 

JEL Classification:

D31 I31 J62 

Supplementary material

11205_2017_1623_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (162 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 162 KB)


  1. Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5), 897–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: are europeans and americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9), 2009–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, D., & Leigh, A. (2009). More inequality, less social mobility. Applied Economics Letters, 16(15), 1489–1492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson, A. B., & Piketty, T. (Eds.). (2007). Top incomes over the twentieth century: a contrast between continental european and english-speaking countries. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beja, E. L, Jr. (2014). Subjective well-being analysis of income inequality: Evidence for the industrialized and emerging economies. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9(2), 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg, M., & Veenhoven, R. (2010). Income inequality and happiness in 119 nations. In B. Greve (Ed.), Happiness and social policy in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  7. Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., Fischer, J. A., Schnellenbach, J., & Gehring, K. (2013). Inequality and happiness: When perceived social mobility and economic reality do not match. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 91, 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bloome, D. (2015). Income inequality and intergenerational income mobility in the united states. Social Forces, 93(3), 1047–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bénabou, R., & Ok, E. A. (2001). Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: The poum hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 447–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Breen, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (2005). Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility. Annual review of sociology, 31, 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bryan, M., & Jenkins, S. P. (2016). Multilevel modelling of country effects: A cautionary tale. European Sociological Review, 32(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carlsson, F., Daruvala, D., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2005). Are people inequality-averse, or just risk-averse? Economica, 72(287), 375–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chávez-Juárez. F. (2012). Shapley2: Stata module to compute additive decomposition of estimation statistics by regressors or groups of regressors. Statistical Software Components S457543, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 17 Jun 2015.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, A.E. (2003). Inequality aversion and income mobility: A direct test. DELTA, Discussion Paper 2003-11.Google Scholar
  15. Clark, A. E., & D’Ambrosio, C. (2015). Attitudes to income inequality: Experimental and survey evidence. In A. B. Atkinson & F. Bourguignon (Eds.), Handbook of income distribution (Vol. 2A). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, A.E., & D’Angelo. E. (2013). Upward social mobility, well-being and political preferences: Evidence from the bhps. CEP Discussion Paper No 1252.Google Scholar
  17. Cojocaru, A. (2014). Prospects of upward mobility and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from the life in transition survey. European Journal of Political Economy, 34, 300–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Corak, M. (2013). Income inequality, equality of opportunity, and intergenerational mobility. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., Johnson, T., McElreath, R., & Smirnov, O. (2007). Egalitarian motives in humans. Nature, 446(12), 794–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Delhey, J., & Dragolov, G. (2014). Why inequality makes europeans less happy: The role of distrust, status anxiety, and perceived conflict. European Sociological Review, 30(2), 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2008). Gross national happiness as an answer to the easterlin paradox? Journal of Development Economics, 86(1), 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dolan. P., & Lordan, G. (2013). Moving up and sliding down: An empirical assessment of the effect of social mobility on subjective wellbeing. CEP Discussion Paper No 1190.Google Scholar
  23. Ebert, U., & Welsch, H. (2009). How do europeans evaluate income distributions? an assessment based on happiness surveys. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), 803–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Esping-Andersen, G., & Nedoluzhko, L. (2016). Inequality equilibria and individual well-being. Social Science Research,. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.12.010.Google Scholar
  25. Fahey, T., & Smyth, E. (2004). The link between subjective well-being and objective conditions in european societies. In W. Arts & L. Halman (Eds.), European values at the turn of the Millennium. Brill: Leiden.Google Scholar
  26. Ferreira, F., & Gignoux, J. (2011). The measurement of inequality of opportunity: Theory and an application to latin america. The Review of Income and Wealth, 57(4), 622–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ferreira, F., & Gignoux, J. (2014). The measurement of educational inequality: Achievement and opportunity. The World Bank Economic Review, 28(2), 210–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal, 114(497), 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Ramos, X. (2014). Inequality and happiness. Journal of Economic Surveys, 28(5), 1016–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fong, C. (2001). Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. Journal of Public economics, 82(2), 225–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frey, B. S., Benz, M., & Stutzer, A. (2004). Introducing procedural utility: Not only what, but also how matters. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 160, 377–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grosfeld, I., & Senik, C. (2010). The emerging aversion to inequality. Economics of Transition, 18(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guillaud, E. (2013). Preferences for redistribution: An empirical analysis over 33 countries. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 11(1), 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Haller, M., & Hadler, M. (2006). How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: An international comparative analysis. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 169–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kahneman, D., & Thaler, R. (2006). Anomalies: Utility maximization and experienced utility. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 211–234.Google Scholar
  36. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kelley, J., & Evans, M. (2016). Societal income inequality and individual subjective well-being: Results from 68 societies and over 200,000 individuals, 1981–2008. Social Science Research,. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.04.020.Google Scholar
  38. Kolenikov, S., & Angeles, G. (2009). Socioeconomic status measurement with discrete proxy variables: Is principal component analysis a reliable answer? Review of Income and Wealth, 55(1), 128–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kraus, M. W., & Tan, J. J. (2015). Americans overestimate social class mobility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 58, 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McBride, M. (2001). Relative-income effects on subjective well-being in the cross-section. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 45(3), 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nikolaev, B., & Burns, A. (2014). Intergenerational mobility and subjective well-being—evidence from the general social survey. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 53, 82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Connell, M. (2004). Fairly satisfied: Economic equality, wealth and satisfaction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(3), 297–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological science, 22(9), 1095–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ravallion, M., & Lokshin, M. (2000). Who wants to redistribute?: The tunnel effect in 1990s russia. Journal of public Economics, 76(1), 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rawls, J. (2009). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Roemer, J. E. (1998). Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Salverda, W., Nolan, B., & Smeeding, T. M. (Eds.). (2009). The Oxford handbook of economic inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Schneider, S. M. (2012). Income inequality and its consequences for life satisfaction: What role do social cognitions play? Social Indicators Research, 106(3), 419–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Senik, C. (2005). Income distribution and well-being: What can we learn from subjective data? Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(1), 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thurow, L. C. (1971). The income distribution as a pure public good. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 85(2), 327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Van de Werfhorst, H. G., & Salverda, W. (2012). Consequences of economic inequality: Introduction to a special issue. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30(4), 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Verme, P. (2011). Life satisfaction and income inequality. Review of Income and Wealth, 57(1), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walasek, L., & Brown, G.D. (2015). Income inequality, income, and internet searches for status goods: A cross-national study of the association between inequality and well-being. Social Indicators Research Online first.Google Scholar
  55. Wendelspiess Chávez Juárez, F. (2015). Measuring inequality of opportunity with latent variables. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 16(1), 106–121. doi: 10.1080/19452829.2014.907247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. (2011). The spirit level. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
  57. World Bank (2015) World development indicators. Available online (last accessed November 2015) at, The World Bank Group, Washington.
  58. Zagorski, K., Evans, M. D., Kelley, J., & Piotrowska, K. (2014). Does national income inequality affect individuals’ quality of life in europe? inequality, happiness, finances, and health. Social Indicators Research, 117(3), 1089–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of SociologyUniversity of NeuchatelNeuchâtelSwitzerland
  2. 2.Laboratorio Nacional de Políticas Públicas (LNPP)Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE)Mexico CityMexico
  3. 3.Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences (FORS)University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
  4. 4.CONACYT-Institución de comisión-Dirección de Institución de comisiónMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations