Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 135, Issue 2, pp 729–750 | Cite as

Well-Being and Relational Goods: A Model-Based Approach to Detect Significant Relationships

  • Stefania CapecchiEmail author
  • Maria Iannario
  • Rosaria Simone
Article

Abstract

A statistical framework for modelling subjective perceptions expressed through ratings is presented. The paper deals with the relationships between personal covariates and self-declared happiness, taking into account several social activities, such as spending time with family and friends, participating in groups and associations, and so on. Our setting concerns a class of statistical models able to measure the effects on life satisfaction of the relational goods which have been proved significant in a large sample of respondents. By means of these models, the proposal enhances the different contributions of subjects’ covariates on their response patterns. The selected approach is based on a mixture model to interpret the assessed perception of two unobserved components, denoted as feeling and uncertainty, respectively, as a blend of real beliefs and indecision. Empirical evidence to support the usefulness of this methodological perspective is provided by a recent observational survey concerning happiness and relational goods.

Keywords

Relational goods Well-being Happiness Ordinal data Uncertainty cub models 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors gratefully acknowledge Editor and Reviewers for their comments that have improved the current version of the paper. This work has been supported by the SHAPE project within the frame of Programme STAR (CUP: E68C13000020003) at University of Naples Federico II, financially supported by UniNA and Compagnia di San Paolo.

References

  1. Agresti, A. (2010). Analysis of ordinal categorical data (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arcidiacono, C., & Di Martino, S. (2016). A critical analysis of happiness and well-being. where we stand now, where we need to go. Community Psychology in Global Perspective, 2, 6–35.Google Scholar
  3. Bartolini, S., & Bilancini, E. (2010). If not only GDP, what else? Using relational goods to predict the trends of subjective well-being. International Review of Economics, 57, 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becchetti, L., Giachin Ricca, E., & Pelloni, A. (2012). The relationship between social leisure and life satisfaction: Causality and policy implications. Social Indicators Research, 108, 453–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becchetti, L., Pelloni, A., & Rossetti, F. (2008). Relational goods, sociability and happiness. KYKLOS, 61, 343–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becchetti, L., Trovato, G., & Londono Bedoya, D. A. (2011). Income, relational goods and happiness. Applied Economics, 43, 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benjamini, Y. (2010). Discovering the false discovery rate. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 72, 405–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 57, 289–300.Google Scholar
  9. Bowling, A., & Stafford, M. (2007). How do objective and subjective assessments of neighbourhood influence social and physical functioning in older age? Findings from a British survey of ageing. Social Science and Medicine, 64, 2533–2549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruni, L. (2008). Reciprocity, altruism and the civil society. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bruni, L., & Stanca, L. (2008). Watching alone: Relational goods, television and happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65, 506–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bünger, B. (2010). The demand for relational goods: Empirical evidence from the European Social Survey. International Review of Economics, 57, 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Capecchi, S. (2015). Modelling the perception of conflict in working conditions. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, 8, 298–311.Google Scholar
  14. Capecchi, S., & Ghiselli, S. (2014). Modelling job satisfaction of Italian graduates. In M. Carpita, et al. (Eds.), Studies in theoretical and applied statistics (pp. 37–48). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Capecchi, S., & Piccolo, D. (2014). Modelling the latent components of personal happiness. In C. Perna & M. Sibillo (Eds.), Mathematical and statistical methods for actuarial sciences and finance (pp. 49–52). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carr, A. (2004). Positive psychology. London: Brunner–Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Clark, A. (2001). What really matters in a job? Hedonic measurement using quit data. Labour Economics, 8, 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. D’Elia, A., & Piccolo, D. (2005). A mixture model for preference data analysis. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 49, 917–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Depedri, S. (2015). Determinants and consequences of on-the-job relationships: An empirical analysis of Italian social cooperatives. Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, 3, 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of moses abramovitz. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Communication from the Commission of 3 March 2010, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  23. Ferrary, M., & Granovetter, M. (2009). The role of venture capital firms in Silicon Valley’s complex innovation network. Economy and Society, 38, 326–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frey, B. S., Luechinger, S., & Stutzer, A. (2005). Valuing public goods: The life satisfaction approach. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich working paper series, 184, 113–140.Google Scholar
  25. Gambacorta, R., & Iannario, M. (2013). Measuring job satisfaction with CUB models. LABOUR, 27, 198–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goel, R., & Nelson, M. A. (2004). International patterns of cigarette smoking and global antismoking policies. Journal of Economics and Finance, 8, 382–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gottard, A., Iannario, M., & Piccolo, D. (2016). Varying uncertainty in cub models. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 10, 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gui, B. (1987). Elements pour une definition d’Economie communautaire. Notes et Documents de l’Institut International Jacques Maritain, 19–20.Google Scholar
  29. Gui, B. (2000). Beyond transactions: On the interpersonal dimension of economic reality. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 71, 139–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gui, B., & Stanca, L. (2010). Happiness and relational goods: Well-being and interpersonal relations in the economic sphere. International Review of Economics, 57, 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gui, B., & Sugden, R. (2005). Why interpersonal relations matter for economics. In B. Gui & R. Sugden (Eds.), Economics and social interactions, accounting for interpersonal relations (pp. 1–22). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Helliwell, J. F., Barrington–Leight, C. P., Harris, A., & Huang, H. (2009). International evidence on the social context of well-being. NBER working paper, 147020.Google Scholar
  33. Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2015). World happiness report 2015. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.Google Scholar
  34. Iannario, M. (2010). On the identificability of a mixture model for ordinal data (pp. 87–94). LXVIII: METRON.Google Scholar
  35. Iannario, M. (2012a). Modelling shelter choices in a class of mixture models for ordinal responses. Statistical Methods and Applications, 21, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Iannario, M. (2012b). Hierarchical cub models for ordinal variables, communications in statistics. Theory and Methods, 41, 3110–3125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Iannario, M. (2014). Modelling uncertainty and overdispersion in ordinal data, communications in statistics. Theory and Methods, 43, 771–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Iannario, M. (2015a). Detecting latent components in ordinal data with overdispersion by means of a mixture distribution. Quality & Quantity, 49, 977–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Iannario, M. (2015b). Modelling scale effects and uncertainty in rating surveys. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, 8, 329–345.Google Scholar
  40. Iannario, M., & Piccolo, D. (2012). cub models: Statistical methods and empirical evidence. In R. S. Kenett & S. Salini (Eds.), Modern analysis of customer surveys: With applications using R (pp. 231–258). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  41. Iannario, M., & Piccolo, D. (2016). A generalized framework for modelling ordinal data. Statistical Methods and Applications, 25, 163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Iannario, M., Piccolo, D., & Simone, R. (2016). CUB: A class of mixture models for ordinal data. R package version 0.1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=CUB.
  43. Lardies-Bosque, R., Fernandez-Mayoralas, G., Rojo-Perez, F., João Forjaz, M., Martinez-Martin, P., & Rojo-Abuin, J. M. (2015). Leisure activities and quality of life among older adults in Spain. Social Indicators Research, 57, 163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Manisera, M., & Zuccolotto, P. (2014a). Modeling “Don’t know” responses in rating scales. Pattern Recognition Letters, 45, 226–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Manisera, M., & Zuccolotto, P. (2014b). Modeling rating data with nonlinear cub models. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 78, 100–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCullagh, P. (1980). Regression models for ordinal data (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 42, 109–142.Google Scholar
  47. McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. (1989). Generalized linear models (2nd ed.). London: Chapman and Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Menon, M., Pendakur, R., & Perali, F. (2014). All in the family: How do social capital and material wellbeing affect relational wellbeing? Social Indicators Research, 124, 889–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Michalos, A. C. (1997). Combining social, economic and environmental indicators to measure sustainable human well-being. Social Indicators Research, 40, 221–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mosca, M., Musella, M., & Pastore, F. (2007). Relational goods, monitoring non-pecunary compensations in the non-profit sector, the case of the Italian social services. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 78, 57–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Piccolo, D. (2003). On the moments of a mixture of uniform and shifted binomial random variables. Quaderni di Statistica, 5, 85–104.Google Scholar
  52. Piccolo, D. (2006). Observed information matrix for MUB models. Quaderni di Statistica, 8, 33–78.Google Scholar
  53. Piccolo, D. (2015). Inferential issues on CUBE models with covariates. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 44, 771–786.Google Scholar
  54. Piccolo, D., & D’Elia, A. (2008). A new approach for modelling consumers’ preferences. Food Quality and Preference, 19, 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Powdthavee, N. (2008). Putting a price tag on friends, relatives, and neighbours: Using surveys of life satisfaction to value social relationships. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 1459–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Prouteau, L., & Wolff, F.-C. (2004). Relational goods and associational participation. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 75, 431–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rodriguez, A. (2010). Leisure and relationship to quality-of-life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 43, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rodriguez de la Vega, L. (2015). The role of context and culture in quality of life studies. Social Indicators Research, 55, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sarracino, F. (2012). Money, sociability and happiness: Are developed countries doomed to social erosion and unhappiness? Time-series analysis of social capital and subjective well-being in Western Europe, Australia, Canada and Japan. Social Indicators Research, 109, 135–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Scabini, E. (2016). Family relationships: A long-lasting source of well-being. Community Psychology in Global Perspective, 2, 36–51.Google Scholar
  62. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2009). The paradox of declining female happiness. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1, 190–225.Google Scholar
  63. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.
  64. Tutz, G. (2012). Regression for categorical data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Uhlaner, C. J. (1989). “Relational Goods” and participation, incorporating sociability into a theory of rational action. Public Choice, 62, 253–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilson, C. M., & Oswald, A. J. (2005). How does marriage affect physical and psychological health? A survey of the longitudinal evidence. IZA Discussion Paper, 1619.Google Scholar
  67. Zweig, J. S. (2015). Are women happier than men? Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16, 515–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political SciencesUniversity of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations