Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Well-Being and Relational Goods: A Model-Based Approach to Detect Significant Relationships

  • 412 Accesses

  • 7 Citations

Abstract

A statistical framework for modelling subjective perceptions expressed through ratings is presented. The paper deals with the relationships between personal covariates and self-declared happiness, taking into account several social activities, such as spending time with family and friends, participating in groups and associations, and so on. Our setting concerns a class of statistical models able to measure the effects on life satisfaction of the relational goods which have been proved significant in a large sample of respondents. By means of these models, the proposal enhances the different contributions of subjects’ covariates on their response patterns. The selected approach is based on a mixture model to interpret the assessed perception of two unobserved components, denoted as feeling and uncertainty, respectively, as a blend of real beliefs and indecision. Empirical evidence to support the usefulness of this methodological perspective is provided by a recent observational survey concerning happiness and relational goods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Agresti, A. (2010). Analysis of ordinal categorical data (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

  2. Arcidiacono, C., & Di Martino, S. (2016). A critical analysis of happiness and well-being. where we stand now, where we need to go. Community Psychology in Global Perspective, 2, 6–35.

  3. Bartolini, S., & Bilancini, E. (2010). If not only GDP, what else? Using relational goods to predict the trends of subjective well-being. International Review of Economics, 57, 199–213.

  4. Becchetti, L., Giachin Ricca, E., & Pelloni, A. (2012). The relationship between social leisure and life satisfaction: Causality and policy implications. Social Indicators Research, 108, 453–490.

  5. Becchetti, L., Pelloni, A., & Rossetti, F. (2008). Relational goods, sociability and happiness. KYKLOS, 61, 343–363.

  6. Becchetti, L., Trovato, G., & Londono Bedoya, D. A. (2011). Income, relational goods and happiness. Applied Economics, 43, 273–290.

  7. Benjamini, Y. (2010). Discovering the false discovery rate. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 72, 405–416.

  8. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 57, 289–300.

  9. Bowling, A., & Stafford, M. (2007). How do objective and subjective assessments of neighbourhood influence social and physical functioning in older age? Findings from a British survey of ageing. Social Science and Medicine, 64, 2533–2549.

  10. Bruni, L. (2008). Reciprocity, altruism and the civil society. New York: Routledge.

  11. Bruni, L., & Stanca, L. (2008). Watching alone: Relational goods, television and happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65, 506–528.

  12. Bünger, B. (2010). The demand for relational goods: Empirical evidence from the European Social Survey. International Review of Economics, 57, 177–198.

  13. Capecchi, S. (2015). Modelling the perception of conflict in working conditions. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, 8, 298–311.

  14. Capecchi, S., & Ghiselli, S. (2014). Modelling job satisfaction of Italian graduates. In M. Carpita, et al. (Eds.), Studies in theoretical and applied statistics (pp. 37–48). Berlin: Springer.

  15. Capecchi, S., & Piccolo, D. (2014). Modelling the latent components of personal happiness. In C. Perna & M. Sibillo (Eds.), Mathematical and statistical methods for actuarial sciences and finance (pp. 49–52). Berlin: Springer.

  16. Carr, A. (2004). Positive psychology. London: Brunner–Routledge.

  17. Clark, A. (2001). What really matters in a job? Hedonic measurement using quit data. Labour Economics, 8, 223–242.

  18. D’Elia, A., & Piccolo, D. (2005). A mixture model for preference data analysis. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 49, 917–934.

  19. Depedri, S. (2015). Determinants and consequences of on-the-job relationships: An empirical analysis of Italian social cooperatives. Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, 3, 49–74.

  20. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.

  21. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of moses abramovitz. New York: Academic Press.

  22. European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Communication from the Commission of 3 March 2010, Bruxelles.

  23. Ferrary, M., & Granovetter, M. (2009). The role of venture capital firms in Silicon Valley’s complex innovation network. Economy and Society, 38, 326–359.

  24. Frey, B. S., Luechinger, S., & Stutzer, A. (2005). Valuing public goods: The life satisfaction approach. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich working paper series, 184, 113–140.

  25. Gambacorta, R., & Iannario, M. (2013). Measuring job satisfaction with CUB models. LABOUR, 27, 198–224.

  26. Goel, R., & Nelson, M. A. (2004). International patterns of cigarette smoking and global antismoking policies. Journal of Economics and Finance, 8, 382–394.

  27. Gottard, A., Iannario, M., & Piccolo, D. (2016). Varying uncertainty in cub models. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 10, 225–244.

  28. Gui, B. (1987). Elements pour une definition d’Economie communautaire. Notes et Documents de l’Institut International Jacques Maritain, 19–20.

  29. Gui, B. (2000). Beyond transactions: On the interpersonal dimension of economic reality. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 71, 139–169.

  30. Gui, B., & Stanca, L. (2010). Happiness and relational goods: Well-being and interpersonal relations in the economic sphere. International Review of Economics, 57, 105–118.

  31. Gui, B., & Sugden, R. (2005). Why interpersonal relations matter for economics. In B. Gui & R. Sugden (Eds.), Economics and social interactions, accounting for interpersonal relations (pp. 1–22). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

  32. Helliwell, J. F., Barrington–Leight, C. P., Harris, A., & Huang, H. (2009). International evidence on the social context of well-being. NBER working paper, 147020.

  33. Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2015). World happiness report 2015. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

  34. Iannario, M. (2010). On the identificability of a mixture model for ordinal data (pp. 87–94). LXVIII: METRON.

  35. Iannario, M. (2012a). Modelling shelter choices in a class of mixture models for ordinal responses. Statistical Methods and Applications, 21, 1–22.

  36. Iannario, M. (2012b). Hierarchical cub models for ordinal variables, communications in statistics. Theory and Methods, 41, 3110–3125.

  37. Iannario, M. (2014). Modelling uncertainty and overdispersion in ordinal data, communications in statistics. Theory and Methods, 43, 771–786.

  38. Iannario, M. (2015a). Detecting latent components in ordinal data with overdispersion by means of a mixture distribution. Quality & Quantity, 49, 977–987.

  39. Iannario, M. (2015b). Modelling scale effects and uncertainty in rating surveys. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, 8, 329–345.

  40. Iannario, M., & Piccolo, D. (2012). cub models: Statistical methods and empirical evidence. In R. S. Kenett & S. Salini (Eds.), Modern analysis of customer surveys: With applications using R (pp. 231–258). Chichester: Wiley.

  41. Iannario, M., & Piccolo, D. (2016). A generalized framework for modelling ordinal data. Statistical Methods and Applications, 25, 163–189.

  42. Iannario, M., Piccolo, D., & Simone, R. (2016). CUB: A class of mixture models for ordinal data. R package version 0.1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=CUB.

  43. Lardies-Bosque, R., Fernandez-Mayoralas, G., Rojo-Perez, F., João Forjaz, M., Martinez-Martin, P., & Rojo-Abuin, J. M. (2015). Leisure activities and quality of life among older adults in Spain. Social Indicators Research, 57, 163–189.

  44. Manisera, M., & Zuccolotto, P. (2014a). Modeling “Don’t know” responses in rating scales. Pattern Recognition Letters, 45, 226–234.

  45. Manisera, M., & Zuccolotto, P. (2014b). Modeling rating data with nonlinear cub models. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 78, 100–118.

  46. McCullagh, P. (1980). Regression models for ordinal data (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 42, 109–142.

  47. McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. (1989). Generalized linear models (2nd ed.). London: Chapman and Hall/CRC.

  48. Menon, M., Pendakur, R., & Perali, F. (2014). All in the family: How do social capital and material wellbeing affect relational wellbeing? Social Indicators Research, 124, 889–910.

  49. Michalos, A. C. (1997). Combining social, economic and environmental indicators to measure sustainable human well-being. Social Indicators Research, 40, 221–258.

  50. Mosca, M., Musella, M., & Pastore, F. (2007). Relational goods, monitoring non-pecunary compensations in the non-profit sector, the case of the Italian social services. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 78, 57–86.

  51. Piccolo, D. (2003). On the moments of a mixture of uniform and shifted binomial random variables. Quaderni di Statistica, 5, 85–104.

  52. Piccolo, D. (2006). Observed information matrix for MUB models. Quaderni di Statistica, 8, 33–78.

  53. Piccolo, D. (2015). Inferential issues on CUBE models with covariates. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 44, 771–786.

  54. Piccolo, D., & D’Elia, A. (2008). A new approach for modelling consumers’ preferences. Food Quality and Preference, 19, 247–259.

  55. Powdthavee, N. (2008). Putting a price tag on friends, relatives, and neighbours: Using surveys of life satisfaction to value social relationships. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 1459–1480.

  56. Prouteau, L., & Wolff, F.-C. (2004). Relational goods and associational participation. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 75, 431–463.

  57. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.

  58. Rodriguez, A. (2010). Leisure and relationship to quality-of-life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 43, 23–39.

  59. Rodriguez de la Vega, L. (2015). The role of context and culture in quality of life studies. Social Indicators Research, 55, 37–52.

  60. Sarracino, F. (2012). Money, sociability and happiness: Are developed countries doomed to social erosion and unhappiness? Time-series analysis of social capital and subjective well-being in Western Europe, Australia, Canada and Japan. Social Indicators Research, 109, 135–188.

  61. Scabini, E. (2016). Family relationships: A long-lasting source of well-being. Community Psychology in Global Perspective, 2, 36–51.

  62. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2009). The paradox of declining female happiness. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1, 190–225.

  63. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.

  64. Tutz, G. (2012). Regression for categorical data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  65. Uhlaner, C. J. (1989). “Relational Goods” and participation, incorporating sociability into a theory of rational action. Public Choice, 62, 253–285.

  66. Wilson, C. M., & Oswald, A. J. (2005). How does marriage affect physical and psychological health? A survey of the longitudinal evidence. IZA Discussion Paper, 1619.

  67. Zweig, J. S. (2015). Are women happier than men? Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16, 515–541.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors gratefully acknowledge Editor and Reviewers for their comments that have improved the current version of the paper. This work has been supported by the SHAPE project within the frame of Programme STAR (CUP: E68C13000020003) at University of Naples Federico II, financially supported by UniNA and Compagnia di San Paolo.

Author information

Correspondence to Stefania Capecchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Capecchi, S., Iannario, M. & Simone, R. Well-Being and Relational Goods: A Model-Based Approach to Detect Significant Relationships. Soc Indic Res 135, 729–750 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1519-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Relational goods
  • Well-being
  • Happiness
  • Ordinal data
  • Uncertainty
  • cub models