Measuring Progress and Well-Being: A Comparative Review of Indicators

Article

Abstract

We provide a new database sampling well-being and progress indicators implemented since the 1970s at all geographic scales. Starting from an empirical assessment, we describe and quantify trends in the institutional basis, methodology, and content of indicators which are intended to capture the broadest conceptions of human social progress. We pay special attention to the roles of sustainability and subjective well-being in these efforts, and find that certain types of indicators are more successful in terms of transparency, accountability, as well as longevity. Our taxonomy encompasses money-denominated accounts of “progress”, unaggregated collections of indicators, indices, and measures oriented around subjective well-being. We find that a most promising innovation is the indices whose weights are accountable to empirical data, in particular through models of subjective well-being. We conclude by amplifying others’ advocacy for the appropriate separation of current well-being from environmental indicators, and for the avoidance of aggregation except where it is meaningful.

Keywords

Well-being Progress Quality of life Subjective well-being Life satisfaction Sustainable development Genuine progress 

References

  1. Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487. ISSN: 0047-2727. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.006.
  2. Anielski, M (2001). The Alberta GPI blueprint: The genuine progress indicator (GPI) sustainable well-being accounting system. Technical report, pp. 1–126.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2014). Measures of Australia Progress, 2013: What is MAP. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/1370.0main+features672013. Visited on 04/09/2014.
  4. Australian Unity. (2010). Wellbeing. Technical report.Google Scholar
  5. Barameechai, J. (2007). The green and happiness index. In: International conference on happiness and public policy, Bangkok, pp. 18–19.Google Scholar
  6. BCStats. (2014). BC Regional Socio-Economic Profiles & Indices. http://www.bcstats.gov.bc.ca/StatisticsBySubject/SocialStatistics/SocioEconomicProfilesIndices.aspx. Visited on 03/29/2014.
  7. Bentham, J. (1789). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Oxford: Blackwell (Reprinted 1948).Google Scholar
  8. Bergheim, S. (2010). The Progress Index.Google Scholar
  9. Bergheim, S. (2015). Ten steps to success quality of life processesA manual. Technical report. Zentrum für gesellschaftlichen Fortschritt.Google Scholar
  10. Bernanke, B. S. (2010). The economics of happiness. www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/ bernanke20100508a.htm (visited on 12/2011).
  11. Boarini, R., & d’Ercole, M. M. (2013). Going beyond GDP: An OECD perspective. Fiscal Studies, 34(3), 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Böhringer, C., & Jochem, P. E. P. (2007). Measuring the immeasurable—A survey of sustainability indices. Ecological Economics, 63(1):1–8. ISSN: 0921-8009. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.008.
  13. Bridgman, B., et al. (2012). Accounting for household production in the national accounts, 1965–2010. Survey of Current Business, 92(5), 23–36.Google Scholar
  14. Brundtland, G et al. (1987). Our common future. Brundtland report.Google Scholar
  15. Cameron D (2010). A transcript of a speech given by the Prime Minister on wellbeing on 25 November. http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/pm-speech-on-well-being. Visited on 12/2011.
  16. Central Statistics Office. (2012). Measuring Ireland Progress: 2011. Technical report, pp. 1–102.Google Scholar
  17. Centre for Bhutan Studies. (2015). Gross National Happiness Index explained in detail. http://www.grossnationalhappiness.com/docs/GNH/PDFs/Sabina_Alkire_method.pdf. Visited on 03/08/2015.
  18. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Health related quality of life: About us. http://www.cdc. gov/hrqol/about.htm. Visited on 05/15/2015.
  19. Cobb, C. W. (1989). In H. E. Daly, & J. B. Cobb (eds.). The index for sustainable economic welfare. pp. 401–57.Google Scholar
  20. Community Foundations of Canada (2013). Vital signs. http://www.vitalsignscanada.ca/en/about. Visited on 05/11/2014.
  21. Cooke, M. (2005). The First Nations Community Well-Being Index (CWB): A conceptual review. Technical report, Indian Affairs and Northern Development, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  22. Coyle, D. (2015). GDP: A brief but affectionate history. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 9781400873630.Google Scholar
  23. Daudey, R. B. P. C. E., & Müller S. H. J. (2012). L’èvolution du bien-être en France depuis 30 ans.Google Scholar
  24. Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs. (2013). Sustainable development indicators. Technical report, pp. 1–99.Google Scholar
  25. Dolan, P., Layard, R., & Metcalfe, R. (2011). Measuring subjective well-being for public policy. Office for National Statistics paper.Google Scholar
  26. Employment and Social Development Canada (2014). Indicators of well-being in Canada: About this site. http://www4.hrsdc.gc.ca/c.4nt.2nt@-eng.jsp?cid=14%5C#header_1. Visited on 05/11/2014.
  27. European Statistical System. (2012). Measuring progress, well-being and sustainable development: The response of the European Statistical System to the report of the Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi Commission and to the ‘GDP and beyond’ Communication of the European Commission. Technical report, pp. 1–4. doi: 10.2785/21299.
  28. Exton, C., Smith, C., & Vandendriessche, D. (2015). Comparing Happiness across the World: Does Culture Matter?” OECD Statistics Working Papers. doi: 10.1787/5jrqppzd9bs2-en.
  29. Federation of Canadian Municipalities. (2012). Quality of life reporting system: About the program. http://www.fcm.ca/home/programs/quality-of-life-reporting-system/about-the-program.htm. Visited on 05/11/2014.
  30. Fleurbaey, M., & Blanchet, D. (2013). Beyond GDP: Measuring welfare and assessing sustainability. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199344154.Google Scholar
  31. Gallup-Healthways. (2014). State of American Well-Being: 2013 state, community and congressional district ansalysis. Technical report, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
  32. GPI Atlantic. (2007). Community GPI. http://gpiatlantic.org/community.htm. Visited on 03/08/2015.
  33. Hagerty, M., et al. (2001). Quality of Life Indexes for National Policy: Review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55(1), 1–96. ISSN: 0303-8300. doi: 10.1023/A:1010811312332.
  34. Hall, J., Barrington-Leigh, C., & Helliwell, J. (2011). Cutting through the clutter: searching for an over-arching measure of well-being. CESifo DICE Report, 8(4), 8–12.Google Scholar
  35. Hall, J., & Rickard, L. (2013). People, progress and participation: How initiatives measuring social progress yield benefits beyond better metrics. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
  36. Helliwell, J., Huang, H., & Wang, S. (2015). The geography of world happiness. In: world happiness report 2015. In J. Helliwell, R. Layard, & J. Sachs (Eds.), Sustainable development solutions network (chap. 2, pp. 12–41).Google Scholar
  37. Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2012). World happiness report. http://worldhappiness.report/ed/2012/.
  38. Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2013). World happiness report 2013. http://worldhappiness.report/ed/2013/.
  39. Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2015). World Happiness Report 2015. http://worldhappiness.report/ed/2015/.
  40. Helliwell, J., & Wang, S. (2013). World happiness: Trends, explanations, and distribution. In Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (Eds.), World happiness report 2013. Sustainable development solutions network (chap. 2, pp. 58–37).Google Scholar
  41. Helliwell, J. F., et al. (2010). International evidence on the social context of well-being. In E. Diener, J. F. Helliwell, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), International differences in well-being (pp. 213–229). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hicks, P. (2012). A framework for citizen-centred social statistics and analysis. Queen’s University School of Public Policy, Working Paper 48.Google Scholar
  43. Human Development Report Office. (2013). Human development report 2013: Technical notes. Technical report, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  44. Institute for Sustainable Development, United Way of Winnipeg. (2013). About peg. http://www.mypeg.ca/about. visited on 05/10/2014.
  45. International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change. (2012). Inclusive wealth report: Policy recommendations. http://www.ihdp.unu.edu/article/read/iwr-policy.
  46. Jacksonville Community Council Inc. (2014). Jacksonville quality of life indicators. http://www.jcci.org/#! indicators/c1e39. Visited on 03/08/2015.
  47. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kasparian, J., & Rolland, A. (2012). OECD’s “Better Life Index”: Can any country be well ranked? Social Applied Statistics, 1–8.Google Scholar
  49. Kroll, C. (2015). Sustainable development goals: Are the rich countries ready? Spotlight Europe.Google Scholar
  50. Land, K. C., & Michalos, A. C. (2016). Fifty years after the social indicators movement: Has the promise been fulfilled? An assessment and an agenda for the future. (this issue).Google Scholar
  51. Lau, A., Cummins, R., & Mcpherson, W. (2005). An investigation into the cross-cultural equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 72(3), 403–430. ISSN: 03038300.Google Scholar
  52. Lind, N. (2014). Legatum Prosperity Index. In: Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 3529–3530). Springer.Google Scholar
  53. Maryland Department of Natural Resources. (2012). Maryland genuine progress indicator. http://www.dnr. maryland.gov/mdgpi/. Visited on 03/09/2016.
  54. Michalos, A., et al. (2011). Technical report 1.0. Technical report, The Canadian Index of Wellbeing and University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON.Google Scholar
  55. Ministry of Social Development. (2010). 2010 The social report: Social indicators for New Zealand. Technical report.Google Scholar
  56. Mizobuchi, H. (2014). Measuring world better life frontier: a composite indicator for OECD better life index. Social Indicators Research, 118(3), 987–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Neumayer, E (1999). The ISEW—not an Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare. Social Indicators Research, 48(1), 77–101. ISSN: 0303-8300. doi: 10.1023/A:1006914023227.
  58. New Economics Foundation. (2009). NAW-About. http://www.nationalaccountsofwellbeing.org/. Visited on 06/03/2014.
  59. New Economics Foundation (2012). The Happy Planet Index: 2012 report. Technical report.Google Scholar
  60. Noll, H.-H. (2004). Social indicators and quality of life research: Background, achievements and current trends. In N. Genov (Ed.), Advances in sociological knowledge (pp. 151–181). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. ISBN: 978-3-8100-4012-1. doi: 10.1007/978-3-663-09215-5_7.
  61. O’Donnell, G., & Oswald, A. J. (2015). National well-being policy and a weighted approach to human feelings. Ecological Economics, 120, 59–70. ISSN: 0921-8009. doi: 10.1016/j. ecolecon.2015.09.021.Google Scholar
  62. OECD. (2011). How’s Life? Measuring well-being. Technical report, pp. 1–286. doi: 10.1787/9789264121164-en.
  63. OECD. (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being.Google Scholar
  64. OECD. (2015). How’s life? Measuring well-being. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  65. OECD (2016a). Better life initiative: Measuring well-being and progress. http://www.oecd.org/progress (visited on 03/2016).
  66. OECD Better Life Initiative. (2014). Executive summary. Technical report.Google Scholar
  67. Office for National Statistics. (2012). Measuring national well-being: Report on consultation responses on proposed domains and measures. Technical report, pp. 1–40.Google Scholar
  68. Office for National Statistics. (2013). Wellbeing policy and analysis: An update of wellbeing work across whitehall. Technical report, pp. 1–40.Google Scholar
  69. Osberg, L., & Sharpe, A. (2010). Beyond GDP: Measuring economic well-being in canada and the provinces, 19812010. Technical report, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, pp. 1–85.Google Scholar
  70. Perry, B. (2009). Non-income measures of material wellbeing and hardship: First results from the 2008 New Zealand Living Standards Survey, with international comparisons. Technical report, New Zealand Ministry of Social Development, pp. 1–76.Google Scholar
  71. Porter, M. E., Stern. S., & Green, M. (2014). Social Progress Index 2014. Technical report.Google Scholar
  72. Redefining Progress. (2014). About redefining progress. http://rprogress.org/about_us/about_us.htm. Visited on 07/15/2014.
  73. Sen, A. K. (1997). Choice, welfare and measurement. Oxford: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Shackman, G., Liu, Y.-L., & Wang, X. (2005). Measuring a quality of life using free and public domain data. Social Research Update, 47.Google Scholar
  76. Sharpe, A., & Smith, J. (2005). Measuring the impact of research on well-being: A survey of indicators of well-being. Technical report, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, pp. 1–119.Google Scholar
  77. Social Progress Imperative. (2014). Social Progress Indexmethodology. http://www.socialprogressimperative.org/data/spi/methodology. Visited on 07/25/2014.
  78. Social Progress Index. (2014). Social progress imperative. http://www.socialprogressimperative.org/data/spi. Visited on 03/08/2014.
  79. Social Weather Stations. (2015). Philippines social weather report. http://www.sws.org.ph/.
  80. Statistics Finland. (2014). Well-being indicators. http://www.findikaattori.fi/en/hyvinvointi. Visited on 07/18/2014.
  81. Stern, N. H. (2006). Stern review on the economics of climate change. U.K. Treasury.Google Scholar
  82. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.Google Scholar
  83. Stone, A. A., Mackie, C., et al. (2014). Subjective well-being: Measuring happiness, suffering, and other dimensions of experience. National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  84. Talberth, J., Cobb, C., & Slattery, N. (2006). The genuine progress indicator. Technical report.Google Scholar
  85. The Boston Foundation. (2014). The Boston Indicators Project: About the project. http://www.bostonindicators.org/about. Visited on 05/11/2014.
  86. The Canadian Index of Wellbeing. (2014a). About the Canadian Index of Wellbeing. https://uwaterloo.ca/ canadian-index-wellbeing/about-canadian-index-wellbeing. Visited on 05/11/2014.
  87. The Canadian Index of Wellbeing. (2014b). Domains. https://uwaterloo.ca/canadian-index-wellbeing/our-products/domains. Visited on 05/11/2014.
  88. The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2005). The Economist Intelligence Unit Quality-of-Life index. The Economist.Google Scholar
  89. The Netherlands Institute for Social Research. (2015). Life situation Index. http://www.scp.nl/english/leefsituatie/.
  90. Treasury Board of Canada. (2010). Canada’s performance: Annual report to parliament 200910. Technical report Government of Canada, pp. 1–105.Google Scholar
  91. UNEP, UNU-IHDP. (2015). Inclusive Wealth Report 2012. https://www.ihdp.unu.edu/article/read/iwr. Visited on 03/08/2015.
  92. United Nations (2015). Inclusive Wealth Report 2012. https://www.ihdp.unu.edu/article/read/iwr. Visited on 03/08/2015.
  93. United Nations Development Programme (2015). Human Development Index. http://hdr.undp.org/en/ content/human-development-index-hdi. Visited on 03/09/2015.
  94. Ura, K et al. (2012). An Extensive Analysis of GNH Index. Technical report, Centre for Bhutan Studies, Under the Patronage of His Majesty the King, pp. 1–148.Google Scholar
  95. Veenhoven, R. (1996). Happy life-expectancy. Social Indicators Research, 39(1), 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. World Health Organization. (2014). WHO Quality of Life-BREF. http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/ research_tools/whoqolbref/en/. Visited on 05/15/2014.
  97. Young, R. (2005a). An overview: Oregon Shines II and Oregon benchmarks. Technical report, Institute for Public Service and Policy Research, University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
  98. Young, R. (2005b). An overview: Oregon Shines II and Oregon benchmarks. Technical report, Institute for Public Service and Policy Research, University of South Carolina.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.McGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Sciences PoParisFrance

Personalised recommendations