Daily Temporal Pathways: A Latent Class Approach to Time Diary Data
- 284 Downloads
Research on daily time and how it is allocated has generally considered the time spent in specific activities. However, social theory suggests that time use is socially patterned whether by social organization, heterogeneity, and/or stratification. Drawing on four broad types of time (contracted, committed, necessary, and free), we use Multinomial Logit Latent Class Analysis to discuss eight daily temporal pathways and associations with individual characteristics. Our analysis highlights the variations and similarities across pathways, the impact of paid work in structuring daily life, the social patterning of sleep and leisure, and socio-demographic profiles of the pathways of working-age Americans.
KeywordsDaily life Latent class analysis Pathways Time use
Funding was provided by National Institutes of Health (Grant No. R01HD053654).
- Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (2006). Changing rhythms of American family life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960) Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. New York: Free Press. Retrieved October 25, 2013, from http://www.getcited.org/pub/101189493.
- Coser, L. A. (1974). Greedy institutions: Patterns of undivided commitment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Durkheim, E. (1912). The elementary forms of the religious life. Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Elder, G. H. (1985). Life course dynamics: Trajectories and transitions, 1968–1980. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88.Google Scholar
- Hamermesh D. S. (2000). Togetherness: spouses synchronous leisure, and the impact of children. NBER, working paper 7455.Google Scholar
- Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Hochschild, A. R., & Machung, A. (1990). The second shift. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
- Hofferth, S. L, Flood, S. M., & Sobek, M. (2013). American time use survey data extract system: Version 2.4 [Machine-readable database]. Maryland Population Research Center, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, and Minnesota Population Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.Google Scholar
- Minnen, J., Glorieux, I., & van Tienoven, T. P. (2015). Who works when? Towards a typology of weekly work patterns in Belgium. Time and Society, 1–24.Google Scholar
- Moen, P., & Roehling, P. (2005). The career mystique: Cracks in the American dream. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
- Townsend, N. W. (2002). The package deal: Marriage, work, and fatherhood in men’s lives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). American Time Use Survey user’s guide. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/tus/atususersguide.pdf.
- Williams, J. C. (2000). Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Williams, J. C. (2010). Reshaping the work-family debate: Why men and class matter. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar