Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Mapping Social Quality Clusters and Its Implications

Abstract

Comparative studies of social quality (SQ) are intricately entangled with social indicators for conducting the theoretical analysis of social reality. Thus, how to utilize and compare the data of social indicators constitutes a crucial issue for SQ comparisons. Since social quality studies possess a strong synthetic feature of analysis, the convenient method of indicator studies by listing score ranking by country seems insufficient to meet the research needs. This study will explore a new way of performing SQ comparisons through a measure of mapping that compiles a different SQ profile and elucidates its clustering effect. Through utilizing World Value Surveys, we present data on SQ-related issues from this database and analyze them through a new technical design. In this way, we identify three SQ clusters and providing some explanations about the rationale of this classification, through which the particular method of SQ analysis and their policy implications are demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Abbott, P., & Wallace, C. (2012). Social quality: a way to measure the quality of society. Social Indicators Research, 108(1), 153–167.

  2. Abbott, P., Wallace, C., & Sapsford, R. (2011). Surviving the transformation: Social quality in central Asia and the Caucuses. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 199–233.

  3. Abbott, P., Wallace, C., Lin, K., & Haerpfer, C. (2015). The quality of society and life satisfaction in China. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-0989-3.

  4. Beck, W., et al. (1997). Social quality: From issue to concept. In L. Maesen & A. Walker (Eds.), Wolfgang Beck. The social quality of Europe (pp. 263–297). The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

  5. Berman, Y., & Phillips, D. (2000). Indicators of social quality and social exclusion at national and community level. Social Indicators Research, 50(3), 329–350.

  6. Berman, Y., & Phillips, D. (2012). Social cohesion. In L. Maesen & A. Walker (Eds.), Social quality: from theory to indicators (pp. 149–172). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

  7. Bobkov, V., Olesya, V., & Ulvi, A. (2013). Risks of society stability and precarity of employment: A look at Russia. International Journal of Social Quality, 3(1), 21–43.

  8. Corbett, S. (2014). A critical qualitative study of the relationship between social empowerment and participatory democracy in the UK. International Journal of Social Quality, 4(1), 7–25.

  9. Ergin, I. (2015). Demographic and socioeconomic inequalities for self-rated health and happiness in elderly: The situation for Turkey regarding World Values Survey between 1990 and 2013. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 61(2), 224–230.

  10. Fairweather, A., Roncevic, B., Rydbjerg, M., Valentova, M., & Zajc, M. (2001). Reconceptualisation of social quality. European Journal of Social Quality, 3(1–2), 118–143.

  11. Gorden, D. (2012). Socio-Economic security. In L. Maesen & A. Walker (Eds.), Social quality: From theory to indicators (pp. 116–148). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

  12. Herrmann, P. (2012). Economic performance, social progress and social quality. International Journal of Social Quality, 2(1), 41–55.

  13. Hu, Z. (1995). Discussing about the calculation of the gravity point of a quadrangle. Bulletin des Sciences Mathematics, 5, 31–32 (in Chinese).

  14. Kuriakose, N. & Robbins, M. (2015). Falsification in surveys: Detecting near duplicate observations. Arab Barometer Working Paper No. 2.

  15. Lin, K. (2014). Social quality and happiness—an analysis of the survey data from three Chinese cities. Applied Research in Quality of Life. doi:10.1007/s11482-014-9352-0.

  16. Lin, K., & Herrmann, P. (Eds.). (2015). Social quality theory: A new perspective on social development. New York: Berghann Boooks.

  17. Maesen, L., & Walker, A. (2005). Indicators of social quality: Outcomes of the european scientific network. European Journal of Social Quality, 5(1/2), 8–24.

  18. Phillips, D., & Berman, Y. (2001). Social quality and community citizenship. European Journal of Social Work, 4(1), 17–28.

  19. Phillips, D., & Berman, Y. (2003). Social quality and ethnos communities: Concepts and indicators. Community Development Journal, 38(4), 344–357.

  20. UNDP. (2014). Technical notesHuman Development Report 2013. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr_2013_en_technotes.pdf.

  21. Vinson, T., & Ericson, M. (2014). The social dimensions of happiness and life satisfaction of Australians: Evidence from the World Values Survey. International Journal of Social Welfare, 23, 240–253.

  22. Walker, A. (1999). Social quality and the future of the European Union. European Journal of Social Quality, 1(1/2), 12–31.

  23. Walker, Alan. (2011). Social quality and welfare system sustainability. International Journal of Social Quality, 1(1), 5–18.

  24. Walker, A., & Wigfield, A. (2003). The social inclusion component of social quality (pp. 1–31). Amsterdam: EFSQ.

  25. Zeng, J. (2005). A character of gravity of quadrangle and its generalization. Bulletin des Sciences Mathematics, 44(3), 30–31 (in Chinese).

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Ka Lin.

Appendix

Appendix

See Fig. 5.

Fig. 5
figure5

Resource: Maesen and Walker (2005), p. 12

The framework of social quality analysis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, K., Li, H. Mapping Social Quality Clusters and Its Implications. Soc Indic Res 134, 403–419 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1432-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social quality
  • Social indicators
  • Cluster
  • Comparative studies
  • Methodology