Social Indicators Research

, Volume 133, Issue 3, pp 1133–1149 | Cite as

DEA-Like Efficiency Ranking of Regional Health Systems in Spain

  • Marianela CarrilloEmail author
  • Jesús M. Jorge


The last decades have witnessed an increasing international concern in assessing how efficiently health care resources are used in producing health. At a country level, comparing the efficiency of regional health systems and ranking the regions accordingly promotes transparency policies and represents an important incentive for the design and implementation of specific programs aimed at improving the quality of health care services within the country. The use of data envelopment analysis (DEA) as a tool for efficiency analysis in the health sector is well-established, but its use with a ranking purpose is discouraged due to lack of discrimination and comparability issues. Using data from the competent health authority in Spain, the purpose of this study is to assess the efficiency of the regional health systems in Spain and identify those regions that are using their health care inputs more efficiently than others, given the observed level of health outcomes. To this aim, a DEA-based model that operates under a common weights basis is used in order to improve discrimination and establish a common scale for a proper comparison of the regional health systems in Spain that can be subsequently ranked by their efficiency score.


Data envelopment analysis Health system efficiency Common weights Ranking 



The authors are sincerely grateful to two anonymous referees whose suggestions have substantially improved the final version of this paper.


  1. Adler, N., Friedman, L., & Sinuany-Stern, Z. (2002). Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. European Journal of Operational Research, 140, 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afonso, A., & St. Aubyn, M. (2011). Assessing health efficiency across countries with a two-step and bootstrap analysis. Applied Economics Letters, 18, 1427–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Afonso, A., & St. Aubyn, M. (2005). Non-parametric approaches to education and health efficiency in OECD countries. Journal of Applied Economics, VIII, 227–246.Google Scholar
  4. Alexander, C. A., Busch, G., & Stringer, K. (2003). Implementing and interpreting a data envelopment analysis model to assess the efficiency of health systems in developing countries. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 14, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Angulo-Meza, L., & Lins, M. P. E. (2002). Review of methods for increasing discrimination in data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 11, 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhat, V. N. (2005). Institutional arrangements and efficiency of health care delivery systems. European Journal of Health Economics, 50, 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carrillo, M., & Jorge, J. M. (2016). A multiobjective DEA approach to ranking alternatives. Expert Systems with Applications, 50, 130–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, Y. W., Larbani, M., & Chang, Y. P. (2009). Multiobjective data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60, 1556–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CIHI-Canadian Institute for Health Information. (2014). Measuring the level and determinants of health system efficiency in Canada. Technical Report. Accessed January 18. 2016.
  11. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. de Cos, P. H., & Moral-Benito, E. (2014). Determinants of health-system efficiency: Evidence from OECD countries. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics, 14, 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deidda, M., Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Codagnone, C., & Maghiros, I. (2014). Using data envelopment analysis to analyse the efficiency of primary care units. Journal of Medical Systems, 38, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Despotis, D. K. (2002). Improving the discriminating power of DEA focus on globally efficient units. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53, 314–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dyson, R. G., Allen, R., Camanho, A. S., Podinovski, V. V., Sarrico, C. S., & Shale, E. A. (2001). Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 132, 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B. R., & Tavares, G. (2008). Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 42, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. European Commission. (2010). Joint report on health systems. European Economy, Occasional Papers 74. Accessed September 28, 2015.
  18. FADSP-Federación de Asociaciones para la Defensa de la Sanidad Pública. (2015). XII Informe Los Servicios Sanitarios de las CCAA. Accessed January 25, 2016.
  19. Figueras, J., McKee, M., Lessof, S., Duran A., & Menabde, N. (2008). Health systems, health and wealth: Assessing the case for investing in health systems. Background document for the WHO European Ministerial Conference on Health Systems, Health and Wealth, Tallin, June 2008. Accessed November 26, 2015.
  20. García, S., Abadía, M. B., Durán, A., Hernández-Quevedo, C., & Bernal, E. (2010). Spain: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition, 12(4), 1–295.Google Scholar
  21. Hadad, S., Hadad, Y., & Simon-Tuval, T. (2013). Determinants of healthcare system’s efficiency in OECD countries. European Journal of Health Economics, 14, 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hollingsworth, B. (2003). Non-parametric and parametric applications measuring efficiency in health care. Health Care Management Science, 6, 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hollingsworth, B. (2008). The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery. Health Economics, 17, 1107–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacobs, R., Smith, P. C., & Street, A. (2006). Measuring efficiency in health care: Analytic techniques and health policy. UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Joumard, I., André, C., & Nicq, C. (2010). Health care systems: Efficiency and institutions. Economics Department Working Papers No. 769. OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/18151973
  26. Joumard, I., André, C., Nicq, C., & Chatal, O. (2008). Health status determinants: Lifestyle, environment, health care resources and efficiency. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 627, OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/240858500130
  27. Kao, C., & Hung, H. (2005). Data envelopment analysis with common weights: The compromise solution approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56, 1196–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kathunia, V., & Sankar, D. (2005). Inter-state disparities in health outcomes in rural India: An analysis using a stochastic production frontier approach. Development Policy Review, 23(2), 145–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu, F. H. F., & Peng, H. H. (2008). Ranking of units on the DEA frontier with common weights. Computers and Operations Research, 35, 1624–1637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mariano, E. B., Sobreiro, V. A., & Rebelatto, D. A. N. (2015). Human development and data envelopment analysis: A structured literature review. Omega, 54, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martić, M., & Savić, G. (2001). An application of DEA for comparative analysis and ranking of regions in Serbia with regards to social-economic development. European Journal of Operational Research, 132, 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MSSSI: Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad. (2014). Indicadores Clave del Sistema Nacional de Salud (INCLASNS. Versión 2). Accessed September 28, 2015.
  33. Navarro, C., Karlsdotter, K., Martín, J. J., Puerto, M., & Herrero, L. (2011). Medida de la eficiencia de los hospitales del Servicio Andaluz de Salud mediante técnicas no frontera. Indicadores sintéticos de eficiencia. Málaga: XVIII Encuentro de Economía Pública.Google Scholar
  34. Nebot, M., & Fernández, E. (2009). Evaluación del impacto de la Ley de medidas sanitarias frente al tabaquismo. Grupo de Trabajo sobre Tabaquismo de la Sociedad Española de Epidemiología. Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social. Barcelona. Accessed January 18, 2016.
  35. OECD. (2014). Health at a glance: Europe 2014. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/23056088.Google Scholar
  36. O’Neill, L., Rauner, M., Heidenberger, K., & Kraus, M. (2008). A cross-national comparison and taxonomy of DEA-based hospital efficiency studies. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 42, 158–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Or, Z. (2000). Determinants of health outcomes in industrialised countries: A pooled, cross-country, time-series analysis. OECD Economic Studies,. doi: 10.1787/16097491.Google Scholar
  38. Parrish, R. G. (2010). Measuring population health outcomes. Preventing Chronic Disease, 7(4), A71. Accessed September 23, 2015.
  39. Pelone, F., Kringos, D. S., Romaniello, A., Archibugi, M., Salsiri, C., & Ricciardi, W. (2015). Primary care efficiency measurement using data envelopment analysis: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Systems, 39, 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pinillos, M., & Antoñanzas, F. (2002). La Atención Primaria de Salud: descentralización y eficiencia. Gaceta Sanitaria, 16(5), 401–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Qi, X. G., & Guo, B. (2014). Determining common weights in data envelopment analysis with Shannon’s Entropy. Entropy, 16, 6394–6414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Retzlaff-Roberts, D., Chang, C. F., & Rubin, R. M. (2004). Technical efficiency in the use of health care resources: A comparison of OECD countries. Health Policy, 69, 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rodríguez-López, F., & Sánchez-Macías, J. I. (2004). Especialización y eficiencia en el sistema hospitalario español. Cuadernos Económicos ICE, 67, 27–47.Google Scholar
  44. Roll, Y., Cook, W. D., & Golany, B. (1991). Controlling factor weights in data envelopment analysis. IIE Transactions, 23(1), 2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roll, Y., & Golany, B. (1993). Alternate methods of treating factor weights in DEA. OMEGA, 21(1), 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Samut, P. K., & Cafri, R. (2015). Analysis of the efficiency determinants of health systems in OECD countries by DEA and panel tobit. Social Indicators Research,. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-1094-3.Google Scholar
  47. Sinuany-Stern, Z., & Friedman, L. (1998). DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units. European Journal of the Operational Research, 111, 470–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Spinks, J., & Hollingsworth, B. (2009). Cross-country comparisons of technical efficiency of health production: A demonstration of pitfalls. Applied Economics, 42, 417–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang, Y. M., & Chin, K. S. (2010). A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 3666–3675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y., & Lan, Y. (2011). Common weights for fully ranking decision making units by regression analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 9122–9128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. WHO-World Health Organization. (2000). The world health report 2000. Health systems: Improving performance. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  52. Wong, Y. H. B., & Beasley, J. E. (1990). Restricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41, 829–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple criteria decision making. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  54. Zohrehbandian, M., Makui, A., & Alinezhad, A. (2010). A compromise solution approach for finding common weights in DEA: An improvement to Kao and Hung’s approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61, 604–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Economía Aplicada y Métodos CuantitativosUniversidad de La LagunaLa LagunaSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Ingeniería InformáticaUniversidad de La LagunaLa LagunaSpain

Personalised recommendations