The Influence of the Human Rights to Water and Sanitation Normative Content in Measuring the Level of Service
Human Rights to Water and Sanitation (HRWS) have been consolidated as relevant frameworks to measure different levels of services. It is essential to move forward with specific initiatives that interpret the content of these human rights and operationalize them through specific metrics. However, some critical issues emerge in attempting this. Different approaches are proposed in this article to tackle this challenge: (1) utilizing a participatory technique to discuss the relative importance of the normative criteria to define water and sanitation services, (2) defining a short list of key indicators to measure the different dimensions of HRWS, and (3) assessing the impact of different weighting systems in the constructing an aggregated index, which has been proposed as a useful tool to monitor water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) from a rights perspective. Two municipalities (in Mozambique and Nicaragua) were selected as initial case studies. The results suggest that there is a common understanding among the experts about prioritization of the HRWS criteria. Differences in the relative importance given to the HRWS criteria can be explained due to the particularities of the local context. Further, the research suggests that expert opinions may be partially conditioned by targets and indicators proposed at the international level. Although the influence of weighting techniques on aggregated measures and their utilization in the decision-making process are limited, this methodology has a great potential for adapting specific WASH metrics to different regional, national, and/or local contexts taking into account the HRWS normative content.
KeywordsComposite indicator Human rights WASH Nicaragua Mozambique Sustainable development goals AHP
The authors would like to thank all families who participated in the study. Further thanks go to ONGAWA–Engineering for Human Development, San Sebastián de Yalí Municipality, Ministry of Health (MINSA), and students from the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Nicaragua (UNAN-León) in Nicaragua, and to the the Municipality of Manhiça, for their valuable contribution during field work, in Mozambique. This study was mainly funded by the Centre de Cooperació per al Desenvolupament (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) [references 0010–2011, 0014–2012, 0001–2013] and the Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo [references 11-CAP2-1562 and 07-CO-068]. We also acknowledge the participation of thirty-seven anonymous experts in the study.
- AquaFed. (2014). Human right to safe drinking water and sanitation. The International Federation of Private Water Operators, http://www.aquafed.org/page-5-59.html#7.
- Bain, R. E. S., Gundry, S. W., Wright, J. A., Yang, H., Pedley, S., & Bartram, J. K. (2012). Accounting for water quality in monitoring access to safe drinking water as part of the Millennium Development Goals: Lessons from five Countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 90, 228A–235A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Baquero, O. F., de Palencia, A. J. F., & Pérez-Foguet, A. (2015). Measuring disparities in access to water based on the normative content of the human right. Social Indicators Research, in press. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-0976-8.
- COHRE WaterAid COSUDE and UN-HABITAT. (2008). Sanitation: A human rights imperative. In Right to water programme (Ed.), Center on housing rights and evictions. Geneve.Google Scholar
- Esty, D. C., & Porter, M. E. (2005). National environmental performance: An empirical analysis of policy results and determinants. Environment and Development Economics, 10, 391–434. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/430.
- Flores, O., Jiménez, A., & Pérez-Foguet, A. (2013). Monitoring access to water in rural areas based on the human right to water framework: A local level case study in Nicaragua. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 29, 605–621. doi: 10.1080/07900627.2012.757017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Grošelj, P., Hodges, D. G., & Stirn, L. Z. (2015). Participatory and multi-criteria analysis for forest (ecosystem) management: A case study of Pohorje, Slovenia. Forest Policy and Economics (in press). doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.05.006.
- INIDE (2005). Censo 2005. Instituto Nacional de Información para el Desarrollo. Retrived from http://www.inide.gob.ni/.
- Jensen, M. H., Villumsen, M., & Petersen, T. D. (2014). The AAAQ framework and the right to water. International indicators for availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality. An issue paper of the AAAQ toolbox. Copenhagen: The Danish Institute for Human Rights.Google Scholar
- Joint Monitoring Programme. (2014). WASH targets and indicators post-2015: Recommendations from International Consultations. Updated April 2014. Retrieved from http://www.wssinfo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/resources/post-2015-WASH-targets-factsheet-12pp.pdf Accessed 02 Jan 2015.
- Joint Monitoring Programme. (2015). Progress on sanitation and drinking-water-2015 update and MDG assessment Geneva/New York, JMP, http://www.wssinfo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/resources/JMP-Update-report-2015_English.pdf. Accessed 03 Nov 2015.
- Jonsson, U. (2003). Human rights approach to development programming, UNICEF. Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Office.Google Scholar
- Komnenic, V., Ahlers, R., & Zaag, P. V. D. (2009). Assessing the usefulness of the water poverty index by applying it to a special case: Can one be water poor with high levels of access? Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 34, 219–224. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2008.03.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Langford, M., Bartram, J., & Roaf, V. (2014). Revisiting dignity: The human right to sanitation. In M. Langford & A. F. S. Russell (Eds.), The right to water: Theory, practice and prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Molle, F., & Mollinga, P. (2003). Water poverty indicators: Conceptual problems and policy issues. Water Policy, 5, 529–544.Google Scholar
- Moriarty, P., Smits, S., Butterworth, J., & Franceys, R. (2013). Trends in rural water supply: Towards a service delivery approach. Water Alternatives, 6, 329–349.Google Scholar
- Munda, G., & Nardo, M. (2005). Non-compensatory composite indicators for ranking Countries: A defensible setting. Ispra: Joint Research Centre European Commission.Google Scholar
- OECD-JRC. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. Methodology and user guide. París: OECD.Google Scholar
- ONGAWA–Engineering for Human Development. (2015). A proposal to broadly measure the human right to water and sanitation: The reality of the rural area of Nicaragua. http://www.ongawa.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ongawa-resumen-ejecutivo-BAJA.pdf.
- Roaf, V., Khalfan, A., & Langford, M. (2005). Monitoring implementation of the right to water: A framework for developing indicators. Global issue papers No. 14. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation.Google Scholar
- Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- Un Special Rapporteur on the Human Right to Safe Drinking Water and Sanitation (2014). Monitoring compliance with the human rights to water and sanitation (chapter 5). Realising the human rights to water and sanitation: A handbook by the UN special Rapporteur Catarina de Albuquerque.Google Scholar
- UNDP. (2015). Human development report 2015: Work for human development. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
- United Nations. (2002). The right to water. E/C.12/2002/1. General comment no. 15 of the Economic and Social Council. New York: UN.Google Scholar
- United Nations. (2009a). Report of the independent expert on the issue of human rights obligations related to access to safe drinking water and sanitation, Catarina de Alburquerque. A/HRC/12/24. In Human Rights Council (Ed.), New York: UN.Google Scholar
- United Nations. (2009b). Statement-Twelfth session of the Human Rights Council, A/HRC/12/24. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/WaterAndSanitation/SRWater/Pages/AnnualReports.aspx, Accessed 2 Jan 2015.
- United Nations. (2010a). Declaration on the right to water. A/RES/64/292. General assembly. New York: UN. http://www.un.org/en/ga/64/resolutions.shtml Accessed 15 April 2015.
- United Nations. (2010b). Human rights and access to safe drinking water and sanitation. A/HRC/RES/15/9. New York: UN. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G10/166/33/PDF/G1016633.pdf?OpenElement Accessed 15 April 2015.
- United Nations. (2010c). Report of the independent expert on the issue of human rights obligations related to access to safe drinking water and sanitation, Catarina de Alburquerque. A/HRC/15/31. New York: UN.Google Scholar
- United Nations. (2012). Report of the independent expert on the issue of human rights obligations related to access to safe drinking water and sanitation, Catarina de Alburquerque. A/67/270. New York: UN. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N12/456/53/PDF/N1245653.pdf?OpenElement Accessed 11 Feb 2015.
- United Nations General Assembly. (2014). Report of the open working group of the general assembly on sustainable development goals, resolution A/68/970. New York.Google Scholar
- United Nations General Assembly. (2015). The human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation-resolution A/RES/70/169. 2015.Google Scholar
- Washwatch.org. (2014). http://www.washwatch.org/en/.
- World Health Organization and Unicef. (2010). Rapid assessment of drinking-water quality in the Republic of Nicaragua. Country report of the pilot project implementation in 2004–2005. Geneva.Google Scholar
- WSP. (2012). Economic impact of poor sanitation in Africa: Mozambique. Washington, DC: Water and Sanitation Program.Google Scholar