Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 132, Issue 2, pp 709–731 | Cite as

Assessing Urban Vulnerability in the Context of Flood and Heat Hazard: Pathways and Challenges for Indicator-Based Analysis

  • Kerstin KrellenbergEmail author
  • Juliane Welz
Article

Abstract

Applying indicators in the context of vulnerability assessments is widespread but remains challenging for various reasons. This article focuses on quantitative estimates of urban vulnerability to climate change related hazards. It presents a methodology to assess three components of residential vulnerability in areas of different socio-environmental conditions: exposure, susceptibility and coping capacity, including the selection of indicators, combination of variables and building of indices. The overall purpose is the assessment of urban vulnerability in order to allow for a more precise consideration of who is vulnerable and why, and to demonstrate the potential coping capacities of people living in flood and heat prone areas. This acknowledges that in Santiago de Chile, the case study used to underpin this article empirically, only hazard exposure assessments have been undertaken so far. The case study findings of the vulnerability assessment confirm that the indicator-based approach is appropriate for analysis of exposure and susceptibility, but that coping capacity appraisal remains a challenge.

Keywords

Urban vulnerability assessment Indicators Hazards Climate change Adaptation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Our thanks go to N. Storz and K. Schleicher, who were involved in defining vulnerability indicators and analysing the indices.

References

  1. Acosta, L., Klein, R. J. T., Reidsma, P., Metzger, M. J., Rounsevell, M. D. A., Leemans, R., et al. (2013). A spatially explicit scenario-driven model of adaptive capacity to global change in Europe. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1211–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger, N. (1998). Centre for social and economic research on the global environment. Observing institutional adaption to global environmental change: Theory and case study from Vietnam. Norwich: Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment.Google Scholar
  3. Adger, N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adger, N., & Kelly, M. (1999). Social vulnerability to climate change and the architecture of entitlements. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 4, 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alwang, J., Siegel, P. B., & Jorgensen, S. L. (2001). Vulnerability: A view from different disciplines. Discussion Paper Series No. 0115. Washington, DC: Social Protection Unit, World Bank.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, M. B., & Woodrow, P. J. (1991). Reducing vulnerability to drought and famine: Developmental approaches to relief. Disasters, 15, 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ayala, L., Espinoza, G., & Saragoni, R. (1987). Estudio de Áreas de Riesgo por Inundación. Segunda Parte. Santiago de Chile: Ministerio de Vivienda y Urbanismo.Google Scholar
  8. Balica, S. F., Wright, N. G., & Meulen, F. (2012). A flood vulnerability index for coastal cities and its use in assessing climate change impacts. Natural Hazards, 64(1), 73–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergstrand, K., Mayer, B., Brumback, B., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Assessing the relationship between social vulnerability and community resilience to hazards. Social Indicators Research, 122(2), 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berman, R., Quinn, C., & Paavola, J. (2012). The role of institutions in the transformation of coping capacity to sustainable adaptive capacity. Environmental Development, 2, 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Birkmann, J. (2005). Vulnerability assessment. Applicability and usefulness of indicators to measure vulnerability. In IIASA-DPRI Forum (p. 37). Beijing.Google Scholar
  12. Birkmann, J., Cardona, O. D., Carreño, M. L., Barbat, A. H., Pelling, M., Schneiderbauer, S., et al. (2013). Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: The MOVE framework. Natural Hazards, 67(2), 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Birkmann, J., Garschagen, M., Kraas, F., & Quang, N. (2010). Adaptive urban governance: New challenges for the second generation of urban adaptation strategies to climate change. Sustainability Science, 5(2), 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Birkmann, J., Tetzlaff, G., & Zental, K. (Eds.). (2009). Addressing the challenge: Recommendations and quality criteria for linking disaster risk reduction and adaptation to climate change. Bonn: DKKV Publication Series.Google Scholar
  15. Birkmann, J., & Wisner, B. (2006). Measuring the un-measurable. The challenge of vulnerability. Source No. 5. UNU-EHS. Bonn. http://www.ehs.unu.edu/file/get/8338.pdf.
  16. Brooks, N., & Adger, W. N. (2003). Country level risk measures of climate-related natural disasters and implications for adaptation to climate change, Working Paper 26, Tyndall Centre for Climate Research, Norwich, University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
  17. Cardona, O. D. (2004). The need for rethinking the concepts of vulnerability and risk from a holistic perspective: A necessary review and criticism for effective risk management. In G. Bankoff, G. Frerks, & D. Hilhorst (Eds.), Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development and people (pp. 37–51). London: Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Celidoni, M., & Procidano, I. (2015). Identification precision of vulnerability to poverty indexes: Does information quantity matter? Social Indicator Research, 121, 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chambers, R. (1989). Vulnerability, coping and policy. IDS Bulletin, 20(2), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cutter, S. L. (1996). Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Progress in Human Geography, 20(4), 529–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cutter, S. L. (2003). The vulnerability of science and the science of vulnerability. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., et al. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18, 598–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., & Shirley, W. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. de Sherbinin, A. (2014). Climate change hotspots mapping: What have we learned? Climatic Change, 123, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Downing, T. E., Watts, M. J., & Bohle, H. G. (1995). Climate change and food insecurity: Towards a sociology and geography of vulnerability. In T. E. Downing (Ed.), Climate change and world food security (pp. 183–206). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. El-Zein, A., & Tonmoy, F. N. (2015). Assessment of vulnerability to climate change using a multi-criteria outranking approach with application to heat stress in Sydney. Ecological Indicators, 48, 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eriksen, S. H., Brown, K., & Kelly, P. M. (2005). The dynamics of vulnerability: Locating coping strategies in Kenya and Tanzania. The Geographical Journal, 171(4), 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eriksen, S. H., & Kelly, P. M. (2007). Developing credible vulnerability indicators for climate adaptation policy assessment. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 12(4), 495–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. European Topic Center on Climate Change Impacts, Vulnerability and Adaptation. (Ed.). (2012). Urban vulnerability indicators. A joint report of ETC-CCA and ETC-SIA. Technical Paper.Google Scholar
  30. Fuchs, S., Kuhlicke, C., & Meyer, V. (2011). Editorial for the special issue: Vulnerability to natural hazards—the challenge of integration. Natural Hazards, 58(2), 609–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Füssel, H.-M. (2007). Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Global Environmental Change, 17, 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Garschagen, M., & Romero-Lankao, P. (2013). Exploring the relationships between urbanization trends and climate change vulnerability. Climatic Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0812-6.Google Scholar
  33. Gladwin, H., & Peacock, W. G. (1997). Warning and evacuation: A night for hard houses. In W. G. Peacock, B. H. Morrow, & H. Gladwin (Eds.), Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity gender and the sociology of disasters (pp. 52–74). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Heink, U., & Kowarik, I. (2010). What are indicators? On the definition of indicators in ecology and environmental planning. Ecological Indicators, 10(3), 584–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heinrichs, D., Krellenberg, K., & Fragkias, M. (2013). Urban responses to climate change: Theories and governance practice in cities of the global South. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(6), 1865–1878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hinkel, J. (2011). Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity: Towards a clarification of the science-policy interface. Global Environmental Change, 21, 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Höfer, R. (2013). Remote sensing based derivation of urban structure types to assess hydro-meteorological impacts in highly dynamic urban agglomerations in Latin America, Ph.D. Dissertation 06/201.Google Scholar
  38. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (INE). (2002). Censo de Población y Vivienda 2002. Santiago: INE.Google Scholar
  39. Jean-Baptiste, N., Kuhlicke, C., Kunath, A., & Kabisch, S. (2011). Review and evaluation of existing vulnerability indicators in order to obtain an appropriate set of indicators for assessing climate related vulnerability. CLUVA Deliverable, D2, 11.Google Scholar
  40. Kelly, P. M., & Adger, W. N. (2000). Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Climatic Change, 47(4), 325–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Krellenberg, K., Link, F., Welz, J., Harris, J., Barth, K., & Irarrazaval, F. (2014). Supporting local adaptation: The contribution of socio-environmental fragmentation to urban vulnerability. Applied Geography, 55, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Krellenberg, K., Müller, A., Schwarz, A., Höfer, R., & Welz, J. (2013). Flood and heat hazards in the Metropolitan Region of Santiago de Chile and the socio-economics of exposure. Applied Geography, 38, 86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kuhlicke, C., Kabisch, S., Krellenberg, K., & Steinführer, A. (2012). Urban vulnerability under conditions of global environmental change. Conceptual reflections and empirical examples from growing and shrinking cities. In S. Kabisch, A. Kunath, P. Schweizer-Ries, & A. Steinführer (Eds.), Vulnerability, risk and complexity: Impacts of global change on human habitats (pp. 27–38). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  44. Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1993). On social research and its language. Heritage of sociology series. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. McPhee, J., Cortés, G., Rojas, M., Garcia, L., Descalzi, A., & Vargas, L. (2014). Downscaling climate changes for Santiago: What effects can be expected? In K. Krellenberg & B. Hansjürgens (Eds.), Climate adaptation Santiago (pp. 19–41). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Morrow, B. H. (1999). Identifying and mapping community vulnerability. Disasters, 24(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moss, R. H., Brenkert, A. L., & Malone, E. L. (2001). Vulnerability to climate change. A quantitative approach, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory operated by Batelle for the United States Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN. Retrieved 22 Dec 2003. http://www.pnl.gov/globalchange/pubs/vul/DOE%20VCC%20report.PDF.
  48. Müller, A. (2012). Areas at risk—concept and methods for urban flood risk assessment. A case study of Santiago de Chile. Megacities and global change, No. 3. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
  49. Müller, A., & Höfer, R. (2014). The impacts of climate and land-use change on flood and heat hazards. In K. Krellenberg & B. Hansjürgens (Eds.), Climate adaptation Santiago (pp. 107–126). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Müller, A., Reiter, J., & Weiland, U. (2011). Assessment of urban vulnerability towards floods using an indicator-based approach—a case study for Santiago de Chile. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 11, 2107–2123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nikolowski, J., Goldberg, V., Zimm, J., & Naumann, T. (2013). Analysing the vulnerability of buildings to climate change: Summer heat and flooding. Meteorlogische Zeitschrift, 22(2), 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. O’Brien, K. L., Eriksen, S., Nygaard, L., & Schjolden, A. (2007). Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Climate Policy, 7(1), 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pelling, M. (2002). Assessing urban vulnerability and social adaptation to risk. Evidence from Santo Domingo. International Development Planning Review, 24(1), 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pelling, M. (2011). Adaptation to climate change. From resilience to transformation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Romero, H., Vasquez, A., Fuentes, C., Salgado, M., Schmidt, A., & Banzhaf, E. (2012). Assessing urban environmental segregation (UES). The case of Santiago de Chile. Ecological Indicators, 23, 76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Romero-Lankao, P., & Quin, H. (2011). Conceptualizing urban vulnerability to global climate and environmental change. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3(3), 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sabatini, F., Salcedo, R., Wormald, G., & Cáceres, G. (2010). Tendencias de la Segregación en las Principales Ciudades Chilenas. Santiago: INE.Google Scholar
  58. Scheuer, S., Haase, D., & Meyer, V. (2011). Exploring multicriteria flood vulnerability by integrating economic, social and ecological dimensions of flood risk and coping capacity: from a starting point view towards an end point view of vulnerability. Natural Hazards, 58(2), 731–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schröter, D., Polsky, C., & Patt, A. G. (2005). Assessing vulnerabilities to the effects of global change: An eight step approach. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 10, 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weiland, U., Kindler, A., Banzhaf, E., Ebert, A., & Reyes-Paecke, S. (2011). Indicators for sustainable land use management in Santiago de Chile. Ecological Indicators, 11(5), 1074–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Welz, J. (2014). Segregation und integration in Santiago de Chile zwischen Tradition und Umbruch. Megastädte und globaler Wandel, Band 11. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
  62. Welz, J., Schwarz, A., & Krellenberg, K. (2014). Understanding hazard exposure for adaptation in a climate change context. In K. Krellenberg & B. Hansjürgens (Eds.), Climate adaptation Santiago (pp. 127–147). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk. Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZDepartment of Urban and Environmental SociologyLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations