Social Indicators Research

, Volume 131, Issue 2, pp 509–525 | Cite as

Reference Groups and Pensioners’ Subjective Economic Well-Being in Europe

Article
First Online:
Accepted:

Abstract

This study contributes to the interdisciplinary debate over the effects of absolute and relative income on subjective well-being by introducing country-level measures of income into the analysis of pensioners’ economic well-being. Both the relevance of alternative reference groups for different phases of old age, measured through median incomes, and the effect of general income inequality within countries are explored. Analyses are based on the cross-sectional components of the survey European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions from 2005 to 2011, containing information on 458,769 pensioners from 31 European countries. With the multilevel linear regression analysis method, the effects of different income measures are analyzed both at the individual and country levels. The main result shows that the average income level of pensioners within countries hold spillover effects strong enough to conclude other pensioners constitute a relevant reference point. Pensioners’ high income level decreases individual income adequacy regardless of age. Results also indicated the labour market group having varying effects on different age groups. The general income inequality does not affect pensioners’ subjective economic well-being.

Keywords

Subjective economic well-being Relative income Income inequality Multilevel modeling method Pensioners 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Atkinson, A. B., Marlier, E., & Wolff, P. (2010). Beyond GDP, measuring well-being and EU-SILC. In A. B. Atkinson, E. Marlier, & P. Wolff (Eds.), Income and living conditions in Europe., Eurostat statistical books Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  2. Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Sarracino, F. (2013). Predicting the trend of well-being in Germany: How much do comparisons, adaptation and sociability matter? Social Indicators Research, 114(2), 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berthoud, R. (2012). Calibrating a cross-European poverty line. ISER Working Paper Series 2.Google Scholar
  4. Caporale, G. M., Georgellis, Y., Tsitsianis, N., & Yin, Y. P. (2009). Income and happiness across Europe: Do reference values matter? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cracolici, M. F., Giambona, F., & Cuffaro, M. (2012). The determinants of subjective economic well-being: An analysis on Italian-Silc Data. Applied Research Quality Life, 7, 17–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cutler, N. E., Gregg, D. W., & Lawton, M. P. (Eds.). (1992). Aging, money, and life satisfaction. Aspects of financial gerontology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. De Santis, G., Seghieri, C., & Tanturri, M. L. (2005). Old age with and without children: economic implications in Italy. In: Paper in European Population Conference, Liverpool, UK. http://epc2006.princeton.edu/papers/60235.
  8. Diener, E., Eunkook, M. S., Richard, E. L., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Easterlin, R. A. (2005). Feeding the illusion of growth and happiness: A reply to Hagerty and Veenhoven. Social Indicators Research, 74(3), 429–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Easterlin, R. A., McVey, L. A., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Smith Zweig, J. (2011). The happiness-Income paradox revisited. IZA discussion paper No. 5799.Google Scholar
  12. EU. (2012). Pension adequacy in the European Union 2010 − 2050. Report prepared jointly by the directorate-general for employment, social affairs and inclusion of the European Commission and the social protection committee. doi: 10.2767/77325.
  13. Eurostat. (2014). Database of income and living conditions/monetary poverty for elderly people. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/income_social_inclusion_living_conditions/data/database.
  14. Eurostat. (2015). The EU-Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC). http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/income-and-living-conditions/overview.
  15. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 997–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. George, L. K. (1992). Economic status and subjective well-being: A review of the literature and an agenda for future research. In N. E. Cutler, D. W. Gregg, & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Ageing, money, and life satisfaction: Aspects of financial gerontology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Gori-Maia, A. (2013). Relative income, inequality and subjective wellbeing: Evidence for Brazil. Social Indicators Research, 113(3), 1193–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hagerty, M. R., & Veenhooven, R. (2003). Wealth and happiness revisited: Growing wealth of nations does go with greater happiness. Social Indicators Research, 64(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansen, T., Slagsvold, B., & Moum, T. (2008). Financial satisfaction in old age: A satisfaction paradox or a result of accumulated wealth? Social Indicators Research, 89(2), 323–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hazelrigg, L. E., & Hardy, M. A. (1997). Perceived income adequacy among older adults: Issues of conceptualization and measurement, with an analysis of data. Research on Aging, 19(1), 69–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heckhausen, J., & Brim, O. G. (1997). Perceived problems for self and others: Self-protection by social downgrading throughout adulthood. Psychology and Ageing, 12(4), 610–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modeling, 20, 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hsieh, C.-M. (2003). Income, age and financial satisfaction. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 56(2), 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kautto, M., Palomäki, L.-M., Rantala, J., & Tuominen, E. (2009). Eläkeläisten tulot ja kokemukset toimeentulosta. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka, 74(3), 290–302.Google Scholar
  26. Layard, R., Mayraz, G., & Nickell, S. (2010). Does relative income matter? Are the critics right? In E. Diener, J. F. Helliwell, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), International differences in well-being. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Liang, J., & Fairchild, T. J. (1979). Relative deprivation and perception of financial adequacy among the aged. Journal of Gerontology, 34(5), 746–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liang, J., Kahana, E., & Doherty, E. (1980). Financial well-being among the aged: A further elaboration. Journal of Gerontology, 35(3), 409–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Litwin, H., & Sapir, E. V. (2009). Perceived income adequacy among older adults in 12 countries: Findings from the survey of health, ageing, and retirement in Europe. The Gerontologist, 49(3), 397–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mood, Carina. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review, 26(1), 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2012). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata. Volume I: Countinuous responses (3rd ed.). Texas: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  33. Rözer, J., & Kraaykamp, G. (2013). Income inequality and subjective well-being: A cross-national study on the conditional effects of individual and national characteristics. Social Indicators Research, 113(3), 1009–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stevenson, B. & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox. NBER Working Paper No. 14282.Google Scholar
  35. Stoller, M. A., & Stoller, E. P. (2003). Perceived income adequacy among elderly retirees. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 22(2), 230–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Veenhooven, R. (1991). Is happiness relative? Social Indicators Research, 24(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Veenhooven, R., & Hagerty, M. (2006). Rising happiness in nations 1946–2004. A reply to Easterlin. Social Indicators Research, 79(3), 421–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Veenhoven, R., & Vergunst, F. (2013). The Easterlin illusion: Economic growth does go with greater happiness. EHERO working paper 1.Google Scholar
  39. Verme, P. (2011). Life satisfaction and income inequality. Review of Income and Wealth, 57(1), 111–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weidekamp-Maicher, M., & Naegele, G. (2007). Economic resources and subjective well-being in old age. In H. Mollenkopf & A. Walker (Eds.), Quality of life in old age. International and multi-disciplinary perspectives., Social Indicators Research Series 31 Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  41. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level. Why equality is better for everyone. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  42. Zagorski, K., Evans, M. D. R., Kelley, J., & Piotrowska, K. (2014). Does national income inequality affect individuals’ quality of life in Europe? Inequality, happiness, finances, and health. Social Indicators Research, 117(3), 1089–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research DepartmentFinnish Centre for PensionsHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations