Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 130, Issue 1, pp 371–388 | Cite as

The Importance of Freedom in the East and the West Over Time: A Meta-analytic Study of Predictors of Well-Being

  • Naoki NakazatoEmail author
  • Ken’ichiro Nakashima
  • Yasuko Morinaga
Article

Abstract

We examined whether sense of freedom is an important predictor of well-being, as compared to other typical predictors, across different periods in modern times (1981–2011), and in the East and the West. We applied a meta-analytical approach to the results of a series of multiple regression analyses conducted on six individual waves of Japanese data sets and five individual waves of American data sets from the World Values Survey. The final sample comprised 6389 Japanese and 6176 American respondents during all study periods. The main findings were that sense of freedom was one of the strongest predictors of life satisfaction (a) among several predictors (i.e., health condition, household income, marital status), (b) consistently across waves, and (c) in both Japan and the United States, as typical collectivistic Eastern and individualistic Western countries. We conclude that the greater importance of sense of freedom in ensuring well-being than other typical predictors is applicable to individuals across time and cultures.

Keywords

Well-being Life satisfaction Sense of freedom Cross-cultural comparison Meta-analysis 

Notes

Author Contributions

N. Nakazato developed the study concept. All authors contributed to the study design. N. Nakazato retrieved data from the World Values Survey website and performed the data analysis and interpretation under the supervision of K. Nakashima and Y. Morinaga. N. Nakazato drafted the manuscript, and K. Nakashima and Y. Morinaga provided critical revisions. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Acknowledgments

We thank Hitomi Sugiura for teaching us how to conduct a meta-analysis using the statistical software R.

References

  1. Adams, G., & Plaut, V. C. (2003). The cultural grounding of personal relationship: Friendship in North American and West African worlds. Personal Relationships, 10(3), 333–347. doi: 10.1111/1475-6811.00053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brief, A. P., Butcher, A. H., George, J. M., & Link, K. E. (1993). Integrating bottom-up and top–down theories of subjective well-being: The case of health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 646–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., Kalil, A., Hughes, M. E., Waite, L., & Thisted, R. A. (2008). Happiness and invisible threads of social connection: The Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 195–219) . New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  5. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 57, 119–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1995). Resources, personal strivings, and subjective well-being: A nomothetic and idiographic approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 926–935. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.68.5.926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497–527. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0076-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. (2009). Well-being for public policy. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E., & Ryan, K. (2009). Subjective well-being: A general overview. South African Journal of Psychology, 39(4), 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13, 81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. EVS (2011). European values study longitudinal data file 1981-2008 (EVS 1981-2008) [data file]. GESIS data archive, Cologne.ZA4804 Data file version 2.0.0. doi: 10.4232/1.11005. Retrieved from: http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu/.
  15. Field, A. P. (2003). The problems in using fixed-effects models of meta-analysis on real-world data. Understanding Statistics, 2(2), 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Field, A. P. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Fischer, R., & Boer, D. (2011). What is more important for national well-being: Money or autonomy? A meta-analysis of well-being, burnout, and anxiety across 63 societies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 164–184. doi: 10.1037/a0023663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glenn, N. D., & Weaver, C. N. (1988). The changing relationship of marital status to reported happiness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(2), 317–324. doi: 10.2307/351999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gove, W. R., Hughes, M., & Galle, O. R. (1979). Overcrowding in the home: Empirical investigation of its possible pathological consequences. American Sociological Review, 44, 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hashimoto, H. (2011). Sougo-kyochosei no jikoiji mekanizumu [Self-sustainment mechanism of interdependence]. The Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50(2), 182–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hashimoto, H., Li, Y., & Yamagishi, T. (2011). Beliefs and preferences in cultural agents and cultural game players. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 14(2), 140–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01337.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hashimoto, H., & Yamagishi, T. (2013). Two faces of interdependence: Harmony seeking and rejection avoidance. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16(2), 142–151. doi: 10.1111/ajsp.12022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 557–560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness: A global perspective (1981–2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 264–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00078.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Larson, R., Mannell, R., & Zuzanek, J. (1986). Daily well-being of older adults with friends and family. Psychology and Aging, 1, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Locke, J. (1690/1824). Two treatises of government. London: C. Baldwin.Google Scholar
  28. Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 527–539. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lucas, R. E., & Schimmack, U. (2009). Income and well-being: How big is the gap between the rich and the poor? Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 75–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Masuda, T., & Yamagishi, T. (2010). Bunka shinrigaku: Jyou [Cultural psychology: Volume one]. Tokyo: Baifukan.Google Scholar
  32. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  33. Nakazato, N., Schimmack, U., & Oishi, S. (2011). Effect of changes in living conditions on well-being: A prospective top–down bottom–up model. Social Indicators Research, 100, 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oishi, S. (2009). Shiawase wo kagaku suru: Shinrigaku kara wakatta koto [Doing the science of happiness: What we learned from psychology]. Shinyosha, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  35. Oishi, S. (2012). The psychological wealth of nations: Do happy people make a happy society?. Malden, MA: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oishi, S., Diener, E. F., Lucas, R. E., & Suh, E. M. (1999a). Cross-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(8), 980–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oishi, S., Diener, E., Suh, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999b). Value as a moderator in subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 67(1), 157–184. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oishi, S., Kimura, R., Hayashi, H., Tatsuki, S., Tamura, K., Ishii, K., et al. (2015). Psychological adaptation to the Great Hanshin–Awaji Earthquake of 1995: 16 years later victims still report lower levels of subjective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 55, 84–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2015.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sato, K., Yuki, M., & Norasakkunkit, V. (2014). A socio-ecological approach to cross-cultural differences in the sensitivity to social rejection: The partially mediating role of relational mobility. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(10), 1549–1560. doi: 10.1177/0022022114544320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schimmack, U. (2008a). The structure of subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 97–123). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  42. Schimmack, U. (2008b). Wellbeingscience.org—The science of wellbeing. http://www.erin.utoronto.ca/~w3psyuli/WellBeingScience/wellbeingscience.htm. Accessed 26 Oct 2008.
  43. Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., Furr, R. M., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Personality and life satisfaction: A facet-level analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(8), 1062–1075. doi: 10.1177/0146167204264292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sugiura, H., Shimizu, H., & Sakata, K. (2013). Shudan to kojin no chii ga naishudan bias ni oyobosu eikyou (3)-Meta bunseki niyoru 4jirei no tougouteki kenshou- [Effect of intergroup and Intragroup status on ingroup bias (3): A meta analysis]. In The 54th annual meeting of the Japanese Society for Social Psychology, Okinawa International University, Okinawa, Japan, 2013. Google Scholar
  46. Uchida, Y., Kitayama, S., Mesquita, B., Reyes, J. A. S., & Morling, B. (2008). Is perceived emotional support beneficial? Well-being and health in independent and interdependent cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(6), 741–754. doi: 10.1177/0146167208315157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Veenhoven, R. (2000). Freedom and happiness: A comparative study in forty-four nations in the early 1990s. In E. Diener & E. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  48. Veenhoven, R. (2014). Freedom and quality of life. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 2356–2359). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Metafor: Meta-analysis package for R, R package version 1.9-4.Google Scholar
  50. World Bank. (2015). World Bank list of economies (January 2015). http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/CLASS.XLS. Accessed 13 Apr 2015.
  51. World Values Survey Association (2014a). The World Values Survey site. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp. Accessed 1 Dec 2014.
  52. World Values Survey Association (2014b). WV1_Data_spss_v_2014_04_29 (Spss SAV); WV2_Data_spss_v_2014_04_29 (Spss SAV); WV3_Data_spss_v_2014_04_29 (Spss SAV); WV4_Data_spss_v_2014_04_29 (Spss SAV); WV5_Data_spss_v_2014_04_29 (Spss SAV); WV6_Data_spss_v_2014_04_29 (Spss SAV) [Data file]. Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp.
  53. Yamagishi, T., Hashimoto, H., & Schug, J. (2008). Preferences versus strategies as explanations for culture-specific behavior. Psychological Science, 19(6), 579–584. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02126.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zou, C., Schimmack, U., & Gere, J. (2013). The validity of well-being measures: A multiple-indicator-multiple-rater model. Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 1247–1254. doi: 10.1037/a0033902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naoki Nakazato
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ken’ichiro Nakashima
    • 1
  • Yasuko Morinaga
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationHiroshima UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations