Time Allocation and Women’s Life Satisfaction: Evidence from Spain
- 548 Downloads
We use data on Spanish dual-earner couples to analyze the relationship between time allocation patterns and women’s life satisfaction. In line with evidence from other countries, we find that part-time jobs yield (on average) higher levels of life satisfaction than do full-time jobs. This paper shows that life satisfaction is affected by the combination of paid work time and unpaid responsibilities. In particular, being responsible for most of the housework reduces life satisfaction for full-time female workers. An analysis by subgroups reveals that having a part-time job and doing most of the housework is associated with greater life satisfaction but only among women with caring responsibilities, without a university education, or with self-reported conservative values. Finally, we explore the role of mismatches between actual and preferred time allocation. Women with part-time jobs are more (resp. less) likely to report mismatches in working (resp. housework) time than are women with full-time jobs. The type of time mismatch that most penalizes working women’s subjective well-being is actually doing less housework than desired. This evidence could help explain the observed “life satisfaction penalty” on full-time female workers. Overall, our findings underscore the continued dominance of traditional gender norms in Spanish households.
KeywordsPart-time employment Housework Subjective well-being Gender
JEL ClassificationJ22 D13 J31 J12 J16
The authors acknowledge financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, Grant No. ECO2011-25661.
- Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Bertrand, M., J. Pan, and E. Kamenica (2013). Gender identity and relative income within households. NBER Working Paper 19023.Google Scholar
- Commission, European. (2014). Report on progress on equality between women and men in 2013. Brussels: Commision Staff Working Document.Google Scholar
- Constant, A.F. and S. Otterbach (2011). Work hours constraints: Impacts and policy implications. IZA Policy Paper No. 35.Google Scholar
- Eurofound, (2011). European company survey 2009: Part-time work in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
- European Commission. (2010). Flexible working time arrangements and gender equality. A comparative review of 30 European countries. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
- Eurostat, (2008). The life of women and men in Europe. A statistical portrait. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
- Fernández-Kranz, D. and N. Rodríguez-Planas (2011b). Unintended effects of a family-friendly law in a segmented labor market. IZA Discussion Papers 5709, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar
- Fortin, N.M. (2009). Gender role attitudes and women’s labor market participation: opting out, AIDS, and the persistent appeal of housewifery. Working Paper, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
- Golden, L., Henly, J. R., & Lambert, S. (2013). Work schedule flexibility: A contributor to happiness? Journal of Social Research & Policy, 4(2), 107–135.Google Scholar
- Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Luttmer, E. (2005). Neighbours as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 963–1002.Google Scholar
- Wunder, C. and G. Heineck (2012). Working time preferences, hours mismatch and well-being of couples: Are there spillovers? IZA Discussion Paper No. 6786.Google Scholar
- OECD (2014). OECD family database, OECD, Paris. www.oecd.org/social/family/database.