Marginal Utility and Economic Development: Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Aspirations and Subjective Well-Being Among Chinese Employees
- 520 Downloads
The post-1979 economic reforms have led to impressive economic growth in China both in terms of gross domestic product and individual income. Individual well-being, however, has not increased on par with the economy (Brockmann et al. in J Happiness Stud 10(4):387–405, 2009; Easterlin et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(25):9775–9780, 2012). In the current series of studies, traditional and multilevel regression models are applied to examine the relationship between income and employee well-being. Results suggest a curvilinear relationship between income and satisfaction (both with one’s job and one’s income), supporting a diminishing marginal utility effect. Additionally, confirming a central postulate of Goal Contents Theory (GCT), individuals who espoused the importance of income (an extrinsic motive) were less satisfied with income itself. Further examining the application of GCT in a Chinese context, results suggest individuals who value extrinsic motives (i.e., money, possessions, fame) exhibit lower levels of job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and feelings of accomplishment. Finally, there is a significant multilevel effect such that between-city levels of health have a significant positive relationship with life satisfaction. These results offer organizational and policy implications related to the interaction between economic prosperity and human development.
KeywordsIntrinsic needs Goal contents theory Job satisfaction Well-being China
I would like to thank Sophia Ka-Yi Ng for her assistance during this research project.
- Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.Google Scholar
- Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation level theory: A symposium (pp. 287–302). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Brief, A. P., & Aldag, R. J. (1977). The intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: Toward conceptual clarity. Academy of Management Review, 2(3), 496–500.Google Scholar
- Brogden, H. E., & Taylor, E. K. (1950). The theory and classification of criterion bias. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 101, 59–186.Google Scholar
- Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Derber, C. (1979). The pursuit of attention: Power and individualism in everyday life. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Money and happiness: Income and subjective well-being across nations. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective wellbeing (pp. 185–218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Grouzet, F. M. E., Kasser, T., Ahuvia, A., Dols, J. M. F., Kim, Y., Lau, S., Ryan, R. M., Saunders, S., Schmuck, P., & Sheldon, K. M. (2005). The structure of goal contents across 15 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(5), 800–816.Google Scholar
- Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., Peterson, R. O., & Capwell, D. F. (1957). The motivation to work. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related behaviors. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Inoguchi, T. (2003, 2004, 2006) AsiaBarometer Survey Data. AsiaBarometer Project (http://www.asiabarometer.org/). Chuo University, Japan. Data files downloaded on June 1st, 2014.
- Jurgensen, C. E. (1978). Job preferences (What makes a job good or bad?). Journal of Applied Psychology, 50, 479–487.Google Scholar
- Lakner, C., & Milanovic, B. (2013). Global income distribution: From the fall of the Berlin Wall to the great recession. Policy Research Working Paper, No. 6719. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.1596/1813-9450-6719
- Locke, E. A., Feren, D. B., McCaleb, V. M., Shaw, K. N., & Denny, A. T. (1980). The relative effectiveness of four methods of motivating employee performance. In K. D. Duncan, M. M. Gruenberg, & D. Wallis (Eds.), Changes in working life (pp. 363–388). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- McEwin, H. R., Fang, X., Zhang, C., & Burkholder, R. (2006). Inside the mind of the Chinese consumer. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 68–76.Google Scholar
- Morrison, W. M. (2014). China’s economic rise: History, trends, challenges, and implications for the United States (CRS Report No. RL33534). Retrieved from https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL33534.pdf.
- Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. I. I. I. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: Irwin-Dorsey.Google Scholar
- Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- United Nations Development, P. (1990). Human Development Report 1990.Google Scholar
- Vansteenkiste, M., Neyrinck, B., Niemiec, C. P., Soenens, B., De Witte, H., & Van den Broeck, A. (2007). On the relations among work value orientations, psychological need satisfaction and job outcomes: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(25), 251–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vansteenkiste, M., Niemiec, C. P., & Soenens, B. (2010). The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: An historical overview, emerging trends, and future directions. In T. C. Urdan & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, v. 16A—The decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (pp. 105–165). London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar