Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 128, Issue 2, pp 467–480 | Cite as

Gender or Occupational Status: What Counts More for Well-Being at Work?

  • Chiara Rollero
  • Angela FediEmail author
  • Norma De Piccoli
Article

Abstract

Literature has conceptualized well-being in the work domain through specific constructs, such as job satisfaction, work alienation, work-family conflict, and the perception of decision-making. Research from a gender perspective has examined gender differences in relation to these variables, showing that—compared to men—women in most cases experience lower job satisfaction, less decision-making, and higher work-family conflict. Another body of studies has driven the attention to the impact of the occupational status, demonstrating a general positive effect of high-status occupations. However, considering disparities between men and women in career success, the documented gender differences may also be influenced by the fact that women generally hold lower positions, as well as the effects of status may be related to the prevalence of men in high-status job. The purpose of the present study was to extend past research by examining the effects of both gender and status on job satisfaction, work alienation, work-family conflict, and decision-making. To this aim 238 workers (52.5 % males) holding high-status (N = 98) and low-status (N = 140) positions were involved in the research. Results indicated that when the relative salience of both gender and status is considered to understand well-being at work, status counts more than gender. Nevertheless, gender remains a significant dimension that may not be neglected, as it plays a relevant role, along with status, on job satisfaction and perception of decision-making. Implications are discussed.

Keywords

Gender Status Occupational well-being General linear models 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Letizia Pucci and Nicole Tornato for their support in collecting data.

References

  1. Allis, P., & O’Driscoll, M. (2008). Positive effects of nonwork-to-work facilitation on well-being in work, family and personal domains. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(3), 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banai, M., & Reisel, W. D. (2003). A test of control-alienation theory among Cuban workers. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 1(3), 243–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, R. C. (1998). Toward a review and reconceptualization of the work/family literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 124, 125–182.Google Scholar
  5. Bond, M. A., Punnett, L., Pyle, J. L., Cazeca, D., & Cooperman, M. (2004). Gendered work conditions, health, and work outcomes. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9(1), 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Booth, A. L., & Van Ourse, J. C. (2009). Hours of work and gender identity: Does part time work make the family happier? Economica, 76(301), 176–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calvo-Salguero, A., Carrasco González, A. M., Martínez, Salinas, & de Lecea, J. M. (2010). Relationship between work-family conflict and job satisfaction: The moderating effect of gender and the salience of family and work roles. African Journal of Business Management, 4(7), 1247–1259.Google Scholar
  8. Carlson, D. S., & Kacmar, K. M. (2000). Work–family conflict in the organization: Do life role values make a difference? Journal of Management, 26(5), 1031–1054.Google Scholar
  9. Ceylan, A., & Sulu, S. (2011). Organizational injustice and work alienation. E+ M Ekonomie a Management, 2, 65–78.Google Scholar
  10. Chao, E. L., & Rones, P. L. (2007). Women in the labor force: A databook. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor, US Bureau of Labor Statistics.Google Scholar
  11. Chiaburu, D. S., Diaz, I., & De Vos, A. (2013). Employee alienation: Relationships with careerism and career satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(1), 4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiaburu, D. S., Thundiyil, T., & Wang, J. (2014). Alienation and its correlates: A meta-analysis. European Management Journal, 32(1), 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cinamon, R. G., & Rich, Y. (2002). Gender differences in the importance of work and family roles: Implications for work–family conflict. Sex Roles, 47(11–12), 531–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46, 95–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clawson, D., Gerstel, N., & Crocker, J. (2009). Employers meet families: Gender, class and paid work hour differences among US medical workers. Social Indicators Research, 93(1), 185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Colombo, L., & Ghislieri, C. (2008). The work-to-family conflict: Theories and measures. TPM, 15, 35–55.Google Scholar
  17. Cortese, C. G., Colombo, L., & Ghislieri, C. (2010). Determinants of nurses’ job satisfaction: The role of work–family conflict, job demand, emotional charge and social support. Journal of Nursing Management, 18(1), 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadia, S., & Vanneman, R. (2001). The glass ceiling effect. Social Forces, 80(2), 655–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cranford, C. J., Vosko, L. F., & Zukewich, N. (2003). The gender of precarious employment in Canada. Relations Industrielles, 58, 454–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Piccoli, N., & Rollero, C. (2010). Public involvement in social and political participation processes: A gender perspective. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 20(3), 167–183.Google Scholar
  21. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duxbury, L., & Higgins, C. (1994). Interference between work and family: A status report on dual-career and dual-earner mothers and fathers. Employee Assistance Quarterly, 9(3–4), 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Graves, L. M., Ohlott, P. J., & Ruderman, M. N. (2007). Commitment to family roles: Effects on managers’ attitudes and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88.Google Scholar
  26. Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greenhaus, J. H., & Singh, R. (2004). Work-family relationships. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied psychology (pp. 687–698). San Diego: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gruenberg, B. (1980). The happy worker: An analysis of educational and occupational differences in determinants of job satisfaction. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grzywacz, J. G., Almeida, D. M., & McDonald, D. A. (2002). Work–family spillover and daily reports of work and family stress in the adult labor force. Family Relations, 51(1), 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gutek, B. A., Searle, S., & Klepa, L. (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(4), 560–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1967). Relationship of centralization to other structural properties. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 72–92.Google Scholar
  32. Halbesleben, J. R., & Clark, S. K. (2010). The experience of alienation among temporary workers in high-skill jobs: A qualitative analysis of temporary firefighters. Journal of Managerial Issues, 22, 531–545.Google Scholar
  33. Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2008). Motherhood: A potential source of bias in employment decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Heinz, W. R., Kühn, T., & Witzel, A. (2005). A life-course perspective on work-related learning. In M. Fischer, N. Boreham, & B. Nyhan (Eds.), European perspectives on learning at work: The acquisition of work process knowledge (pp. 196–215). Cedefop Reference Series, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications for European Communities.Google Scholar
  35. Hill, N. R. (2009). An empirical exploration of the occupational satisfaction of counselor educators: The influence of gender, tenure status, and minority status. Journal of Counseling & Development, 87(1), 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kanungo, R. N. (1979). The concepts of alienation and involvement revisited. Psychological Bulletin, 86(1), 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 341–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lowe, G. (2007). 21st century job quality: Achieving what Canadians want. Research Report W|37. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks.Google Scholar
  39. Lyonette, C., Crompton, R., & Wall, K. (2007). Gender, occupational class and work–life conflict: A comparison of Britain and Portugal. Community, Work and Family, 10(3), 283–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Magee, W. (2013). Anxiety, demoralization, and the gender difference in job satisfaction. Sex Roles, 69(5–6), 308–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Matthews, R. A., Kath, L. M., & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (2010). A short, valid, predictive measure of work–family conflict: Item selection and scale validation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(1), 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Matud, M. P. (2004). Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(7), 1401–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McKinlay, J. B., & Marceau, L. (2011). New wine in an old bottle: does alienation provide an explanation of the origins of physician discontent? International Journal of Health Services, 41(2), 301–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McNichols, C. W., Stahl, M. J., & Manley, T. R. (1978). A validation of Hoppock’s job satisfaction measure. Academy of Management Journal, 21(4), 737–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Michael, G., Anastasios, S., Helen, K., Catherine, K., & Christine, K. (2009). Gender differences in experiencing occupational stress: The role of age, education and marital status. Stress and Health, 25(5), 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Miner, K. N., Pesonen, A. D., Smittick, A. L., Seigel, M. L., & Clark, E. K. (2014). Does being a mom help or hurt? Workplace incivility as a function of motherhood status. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(1), 60–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moen, P., & Yu, Y. (2000). Effective work/life strategies: Working couples, work conditions, gender, and life quality. Social Problems, 47(3), 291–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nair, N., & Vohra, N. (2009). Developing a new measure of work alienation. Journal of Workplace Rights, 14(3), 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ngo, H. Y., Foley, S., Ji, M. S., & Loi, R. (2014). Work satisfaction of Chinese employees: A social exchange and gender-based view. Social Indicators Research, 116(2), 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Niezborala, M., Marquie, J. C., Baracat, B., Esquirol, Y., & Soulat, J. (2003). Job stress and occupational status in a French cohort. Revue d’Epi-demiologie et Santé Publique, 51(6), 607–616.Google Scholar
  51. Okimoto, T. G., & Heilman, M. E. (2012). The “bad parent” assumption: How gender stereotypes affect reactions to working mothers. Journal of Social Issues, 68(4), 704–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Organ, D. W., & Greene, C. N. (1981). The effects of formalization on professional involvement: A compensatory process approach. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 237–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Oshagbemi, T. (1999). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single versus multiple-item measures? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14(5), 388–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Osorio, L. C., Cohen, M., Escobar, S. E., Salkowski-Bartlett, A., & Compton, R. J. (2003). Selective attention to stressful distracters: Effects of neuroticism and gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(5), 831–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Phelan, J. (1994). The paradox of the contented female worker: An assessment of alternative explanations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pines, A. M., & Zaidman, N. (2003). Gender, culture, and social support: A male–female, Israeli Jewish-Arab comparison. Sex Roles, 49(11–12), 571–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Riley, A. L., & Keith, V. M. (2004). Work and housework conditions and depressive symptoms among married women: The importance of occupational status. Women and Health, 38(4), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rollero, C., & Fedi, A. (2014). When benevolence harms women and favours men: The effects of ambivalent sexism on leadership roles. Ceskoslovenska Psychologie, 58(6), 535–542.Google Scholar
  59. Rollero, C., & Tartaglia, S. (2013). Men and women at work: The effects of objectification on competence, pay, and fit for the job. Studia Psychologica, 55(2), 139–152.Google Scholar
  60. Salinas-Jiménez, M., Artés, J., & Salinas-Jiménez, J. (2013). How do educational attainment and occupational and wage-earner statuses affect life satisfaction? A gender perspective study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(2), 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schieman, S., Whitestone, Y. K., & Van Gundy, K. (2006). The nature of work and the stress of higher status. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47(3), 242–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shantz, A., Alfes, K., & Truss, C. (2014). Alienation from work: Marxist ideologies and twenty-first-century practice. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(18), 2529–2550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shields, M. (2006). Unhappy on the job. Health Reports. Ottawa, Canada: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
  64. Sirgy, M. J., Efraty, D., Siegel, P., & Lee, D. J. (2001). A new measure of quality of work life (QWL) based on need satisfaction and spillover theories. Social Indicators Research, 55(3), 241–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Slotkin, J. H. (2008). Rabenmutter and the glass ceiling: An analysis of role conflict experienced by women lawyers in Germany compared with women lawyers in the United States. California Western International Law Journal, 38(2), 287–330.Google Scholar
  66. Sookoo, N. (2014). Perceptions of injustice and alienation dynamics within the workplace. Journal of the Department of Behavioural Sciences, 3(1), 81–99.Google Scholar
  67. Sulu, S., Ceylan, A., & Kaynak, R. (2010). Work alienation as a mediator of the relationship between organizational injustice and organizational commitment: Implications for healthcare professionals. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(8), 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thompson, E. R., & Phua, F. T. (2012). A brief index of affective job satisfaction. Group and Organization Management, 37(3), 275–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tytherleigh, M. Y., Jacobs, P. A., Webb, C., Ricketts, C., & Cooper, C. (2007). Gender, health and stress in English university staff—Exposure or vulnerability? Applied Psychology, 56(2), 267–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. UNDP. (2007). Human development report 2007/2008. New York: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
  71. Van Engen, M. L., Vinkenburg, C. J., & Dikkers, J. S. (2012). Sustainability in combining career and care: Challenging normative beliefs about parenting. Journal of Social Issues, 68(4), 645–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Van Veldhoven, M. J., & Beijer, S. E. (2012). Workload, work-to-family conflict, and health: Gender differences and the influence of private life contexts. Journal of Social Issues, 68(4), 665–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wilks, D. C., & Neto, F. (2013). Workplace well-being, gender and age: Examining the ‘double jeopardy’ effect. Social Indicators Research, 114(3), 875–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yoo, G. (2003). Quality of life across population groups: Women in the workplace: Gender and wage differentials. Social Indicators Research, 62–63(1–3), 367–385.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chiara Rollero
    • 1
  • Angela Fedi
    • 2
    Email author
  • Norma De Piccoli
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of PsychologyUniversity eCampusNovedrateItaly
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TurinTurinItaly
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TurinTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations