The Impact of Exposure to Other Countries on Life Satisfaction: An International Application of the Relative Income Hypothesis
- 466 Downloads
The cause of international differences in life satisfaction is usually ascribed to differences in living standards. Yet, despite improving living standards in a lot of middle-income countries, significant differences in life satisfaction between middle- and high-income countries remain. This paper examines if there is an international comparison effect and assesses to what extent the relative income hypothesis can be applied to explain international differences in life satisfaction. We test this by analyzing how exposure to other countries impacts life satisfaction. It is hypothesized that higher exposure to other countries in low- and middle-income countries has a negative effect due to increased aspirations and relative deprivation, while the opposite holds true for rich countries. We draw on data from the World Value Survey, the World Bank and the KOF Globalization index to perform a multilevel analysis. The results suggest that an international comparison effect indeed exists and is capable of partially explaining international differences in life satisfaction. Additional analyses reveal that people in lower income classes, in all countries, are affected more by exposure to other countries, indicating that individual characteristics are important when assessing the impact of exposure on life satisfaction. We demonstrate the robustness of these findings by showing that both sub-indicators of exposure, informational flow and international contact, have an impact on life satisfaction that is similar to that of our overall exposure-index.
KeywordsLife satisfaction Subjective well-being Reference groups Globalization Relative income
The author would like to thank Elsy Verhofstadt, Luc Van Ootegem, Brent Bleys, Walter van Trier and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments and valuable suggestions on earlier drafts.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Aronsson, T., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2013). Keeping up with the Joneses, the Smiths and the Tanakas: Optimal taxation with social comparisons in a multi-country economy (No. 862). Umeå University, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
- Bafumi, J., & Gelman. A. (2006). Fitting multilevel models when predictors and group effects correlate. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Cheah, B. C. (2009). Clustering standard errors or modeling multilevel data? Research note. New York, NY: Columbia University Department of Statistics.Google Scholar
- Clark, A. E., & Senik, C. (2011). Will GDP growth increase happiness in developing countries? In R. Peccoud (Ed.), Measure for measure: How well do we measure development? (pp. 99–176). Paris: STIN.Google Scholar
- Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). National differences in subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 434–450). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Duesenberry, J. S. (1967). Income saving and the theory of consumer behaviour. Oxford: Oxford University Press ((1949) Harvard University: Harvard Economic Study. 87).Google Scholar
- Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Nations and Households in Economic Growth, 89, 89–125.Google Scholar
- Friedman, B. (2005). The moral consequences of economic growth. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
- Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2012). World happiness report. The Earth Institute: Columbia University, New York (NY).Google Scholar
- Krasnova, H., Wenninger, H., Widjaja, T., & Bruxmann, P. (2013). Envy on facebook: A hidden threat to users’ life satisfaction? In Presented at the 11th international conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik. Leipzig, Germany.Google Scholar
- Merton, R. K., & Kitt, A. S. (1950). Contributions to the theory of reference group behavior. In R. K. Merton & P. F. Lazersfeld (Eds.), Continuities in social research. Studies in the scope and method of “The American Soldier”. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Stevenson, B. & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox. In Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, pp. 1–102.Google Scholar
- Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2010). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.Google Scholar
- Stouffer, S. A., Hovland, C. I., & Social Science Research Council (US), United States, Army Service Forces, & Information and Education Division. (1949). Studies in social psychology in World War II. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- World Bank. (2013). World development indicators 2013. Washington, DC: World Bank. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0. doi: 10.1596/978-0-8213-9824-1.