Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 127, Issue 3, pp 1391–1416 | Cite as

Shifting Values and Life Satisfaction: A Sequential Cross-Sectional Study of the Influence of Values on Subjective Wellbeing in Singapore

  • Soo Jiuan Tan
  • Siok Kuan TambyahEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper compares the findings of two sequential cross-sectional studies of Singaporeans conducted in 2001 and 2011 with regard to the stability of values and their influence on life satisfaction. Using supporting literature, we propose several hypotheses on the relationships between values and Singaporeans’ life satisfaction. We first report the means, importance ranks and changes in percentages for the values in the List of Values and the movements over the years. While values like security and sense of belonging have become more important, being well-respected has become less important over the decade. We then discuss the levels of life satisfaction, satisfaction with specific life domains and overall life satisfaction for Singaporeans, and the changes over 10 years. Using regression analyses and ANOVA, we examine the impact of shifting values and certain demographic variables on the life satisfaction of Singaporeans over the decade. Excitement and warm relationships with others were found to have a significant and positive influence on life satisfaction for both 2001 and 2011. The positive impact of self respect on life satisfaction was only significant in 2001, while security and sense of belonging had a significant negative and positive impact respectively on life satisfaction only in 2011. The effects of these values on life satisfaction were felt differently across age, gender, marital status, education, and income levels in 2001 and 2011. We conclude the paper with limitations and implications for policy making and future research.

Keywords

Values Life satisfaction Singapore List of Values Subjective wellbeing 

References

  1. Ahuvia, A. C. (2002). Individualism/collectivism and cultures of happiness: A theoretical conjecture on the relationship between consumption, culture and subjective well-being at the National Level. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball-Rokeach, S., Rokeach, M., & Grube, J. W. (1984). The great American values test: Influencing behavior and belief through television. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.Google Scholar
  4. Beatty, S. E., Kahle, L. R., & Homer, P. (1991). Personal values and gift giving behavior: A study across cultures. Journal of Business Research, 20, 183–190.Google Scholar
  5. Beatty, S. E., Kahle, L. R., Utsey, M., & Keown, C. (1993). Gift giving behaviors in the United States and Japan: A personal values perspective. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 6(1), 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beatty, S. E., Yoon, M. H., Grunert, S. C., & Helgeson, J. G. (1996). An examination of gift- giving behaviors and personal values in four countries. Otnes & Beltramini, Gift giving: A research anthology (pp. 19–36). Bowling Green: Popular Press.Google Scholar
  7. Belk, R. W. (1985). Materialism: Trait aspects of living in the material world. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2000). Wellbeing over time in Britain and the USA. In NEBR Working Paper No. 7487. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  9. Bobowik, M., Basabe, N., Paez, D., Jimenez, A., & Bilbao, A. (2011). Personal values and well-being among Europeans, Spanish natives and immigrants to Spain: Does the culture matter? Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(3), 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borooah, V. K. (2006). What makes people happy? Some evidence from Northern Ireland. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 427–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buettner, D. (2010). Thrive: Finding happiness in the blue zones way. Washington, D.C.: National Geographic.Google Scholar
  12. Burroughs, J. E., & Rindfeisch, A. (2002). Materialism and well-being: a conflicting values perspectives. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 348–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell, A. (1976). Subjective measures of wellbeing. American Psychologist, 31, 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chan, R., Ong, A., & Au-Yong, R. (2014). Feeling the tight squeeze in the middle. The Straits Times, Saturday, April 19, 2014, p. D2.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, A., & Shamai, O. (2010). The relationship between individual values, psychological well-being, and organizational commitment among Israeli police officers. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 33(1), 30–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cramer, V., Torgersen, S., & Kringlen, E. (2004). Quality of life in a city: The effect of population density. Social Indicators Research, 27, 411–420.Google Scholar
  17. Dalton, R., & Shin, D. (Eds.) (2006). Citizens, democracy, and markets around the Pacific rim. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Demir, M., & Ozdemir, M. (2010). Friendship, need satisfaction and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2008). Happiness: Unlocking the mysteries of psychological wealth. New York: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 68(4), 653–663.Google Scholar
  21. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40, 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Diener, E., & Tov, W. (2012). National accounts of well-being. In K. C. Land, J. Sirgy & A. C. Michelos (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 137–157). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Dural, J. (2011). S’pore has lost glue that binds community. The Sunday Times, p. 37.Google Scholar
  25. Georgellis, Y., Tsitsianis, N., & Yin, Y. P. (2009). Personal values as mitigating factors in the link between income and life satisfaction: Evidence from the European Social Survey. Social Indicators Research, 91, 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gurel-Atay, E., Xie, G. X., Chen, J., & Kahle, L. R. (2010). Changes in social values in the United States, 1976–2007. Journal of Advertising Research, 50(1), 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haslam, N., Whelan, J., & Bastian, B. (2009). Big five traits mediate associations between values and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(1), 40–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hellevik, O. (2003). Economic, values and happiness in Norway. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 243–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hofer, J., Chasiotis, A., & Campos, D. (2006). Congruence between social values and implicit motives: Effects on life satisfaction across three cultures. European Journal of Personality, 20, 305–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoge, D. R., & Bender, I. E. (1974). Factors influencing value change among college graduates in adult life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 572–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Inoguchi, T., & Fujii, S. (2009). The quality of life in Japan. Social Indicators Research, 92, 227–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Inoguchi, T., & Shin, D. C. (2009). The quality of life in Confucian Asia: From physical welfare to subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 92(2), 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jarden, A. (2010). Relationships between personal values and depressed mood and subjective wellbeing. In Doctoral Thesis. Christchurch: University of Canterbury.Google Scholar
  34. Kahle, L. R. (1983). Social values and social change: Adaptation to life in America. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  35. Kahle, L. R. (1996). Social values and consumer behavior: Research from the List of Values. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 135–151). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  36. Kang, S. M., Shaver, P. R., Sue, S., Min, K. H., & Jing, H. (2003). Culture-specific patterns in the prediction of life satisfaction: Roles of emotion, relationship quality, and self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(12), 1586–1608.Google Scholar
  37. Kau, A. K., Jung, K., Tan, S. J., & Wirtz, J. (2000). The influence of materialistic inclination on values, life satisfaction and aspirations: An empirical analysis. Social Indicators Research, 49, 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kau, A. K., & Wang, S. H. (1995). Assessing quality of life in Singapore: an exploratory study. Social Indicators Research, 35, 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Konty, M. A., & Dunham, C. C. (1997). Differences in value and attitude change over the life course. Sociological Spectrum, 17, 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kwan, V. S. Y., Bond, M. H., & Singelis, T. M. (1997). Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony in self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1038–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. La Barbera, P. A., & Gurhan-Canli, Z. (1997). The role of materialism, religiosity and demographics in subjective well-being. Psychology & Marketing, 14, 71–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee, A. (2003). Stability and change in Korean values. Social Indictors Research, 62(63), 93–117.Google Scholar
  43. Lee, M. (2012). S’pore ranks highest in quality of living in Asia. The Business Times.Google Scholar
  44. Li, N. P., Patel, L., Balliet, D., Tov, W., & Scollon, C. N. (2011). The incompatibility of materialism and the desire of children: Psychological insights into the fertility discrepancy among modern countries. Social Indicators Research, 101, 391–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Limon, Y., Kahle, L. R., & Orth, U. (2009). Package design as a communications vehicle in cross-cultural values shopping. Journal of International Marketing, 17(34), 30–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mellor, D., Stokes, M., Firth, L., Hayashi, Y., & Cummins, R. (2008). Need for belonging, relationship satisfaction, loneliness, and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Michalos, A. C. (1986). Job satisfaction, marital satisfaction and the quality of life: A review and preview. In F. M. Andrews (Ed.), Research on the Quality of Life (pp. 57–88). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  48. Michalos, A. C. (1991). Global report on student well-being. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Nagy, S., Piskoti, I., Molnar, L., & Marien, A. (2012). The relationship between values and general environmental behavior. Economics and Management, 17(1), 272–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Newcomb, T. M., Koenig, K., Flacks, R., & Warwick, D. P. (1967). Persistence and change: Bennington College and its students after 25 years. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. C., & Rusting, L. (1999). Gender differences in well-being. Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 330–350). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  52. Oishi, S., Diener, E., Lucas, R., & Suh, E. M. (1999). Cross cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 980–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ong, A. (2013). Getting a measure of happiness. The Straits Times.Google Scholar
  54. Orth, U., & Kahle, L. R. (2008). Intrapersonal variation in consumer susceptibility to normative influence: Toward a better understanding of brand choice decisions. Journal of Social Psychology, 148(4), 423–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Park, C. (2009). The quality of life in South Korea. Social Indicators Research, 92(2), 263–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rokeach, M. (1983). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  59. Ryan, L., & Dziurawiec, S. (2001). Materialism and its relationship to life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 55, 85–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2000). Values, priorities and subjective well-being: Direct relations and congruity effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 550–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shu, X., & Zhu, Y. (2009). The quality of life in China. Social Indicators Research, 92(2), 91–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sing, M. (2009). The quality of life in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 92(2), 295–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Siow, L. S. (2011). S’poreans are Asia’s second richest: Report. The Business Times.Google Scholar
  65. Sirgy, M. J., Gurel-Atay, E., Webb, D., Cicic, M., Husic-Mehmedovic, M., Ekici, A., et al. (2013). Is materialism all that bad? Effects on satisfaction with material life, life satisfaction, and economic motivation. Social Indicators Research, 110, 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Slingerland, E. (2003). Confucius analects. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  67. Stockard, J., Carpenter, G., & Kahle, L. R. (2014). Continuity and change in values in midlife: Testing the age stability hypothesis. Experimental Aging Research, 40(2), 224–244.Google Scholar
  68. Tambyah, S. K., & Tan, S. J. (2013). Happiness and wellbeing: The Singaporean experience. United Kingdom: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Tambyah, S. K., Tan, S. J., & Kau, A. K. (2009a). The quality of life in Singapore. Social Indicators Research, 92(2), 337–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tambyah, S. K., Tan, S. J., & Kau, A. K. (2009b). The wellbeing of Singaporeans: Values, lifestyles, satisfaction and quality of life. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  71. Tan, S. J., Tambyah, S. K., & Kau, A. K. (2006). The influence of value orientations and demographics on quality of life perceptions: Evidence from a national survey of Singaporeans. Social Indicators Research, 78, 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Timmer, S. G., & Kahle, L. R. (1983). Ascribed and attained demographic correlated of values. In L. R. Kahle (Ed.), Social values and social change: Adaptation to life in America. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  73. Uchida, Y., Kitayama, S., Mesquita, B., & Reves, J. (2001). Interpersonal sources of happiness: The relative significance in the U.S., the Philippines, and Japan. In Paper presented at a meeting of the American Psychological Society, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  74. Urzua, A., Miranda-Castillo, C., Caqueo-Urizar, A., & Mascayano, F. (2013). Do cultural values affect quality of life evaluations? Social Indicators Research, 114, 1295–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Veroff, J., Douvan, E., & Kulka, R. A. (1981). The inner American: A self-portrait from 1957 to 1976. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  76. Webb, D., & Wong, J. (2013). Exploring antecedents of charitable giving and their impact on subjective well-being in Singapore. Social Indicators Research (published online 26 April 2013).Google Scholar
  77. Wong, K. Y., & Wan, P. S. (2009). New evidence of the postmaterialist shift: The experience of Hong Kong. Social Indicator Research, 92, 497–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wright, N. D., & Larsen, V. (1993). Materialism and life satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction, and Complaining Behavior, 6, 158–165.Google Scholar
  79. Yao, G., Cheng, Y., & Cheng, C. (2009). The quality of life in Taiwan. Social Indicators Research, 92(2), 377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NUS Business SchoolNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.NUS Business SchoolNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations