Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 127, Issue 2, pp 721–739 | Cite as

Disparities in Quality of Life Among South Africans With and Without Disabilities

  • Lauren GrahamEmail author
  • Eleanor Ross
Article

Abstract

Although quality of life is recognised as a key area of research when assessing development, it has received little attention when studying disability in South Africa and other developing contexts. As a result we know relatively little about how people with disabilities living in developing contexts fare in comparison to their counterparts without disabilities. In this article we seek to address this gap. We draw on secondary data analysis of a national panel study to compare the outcomes of people with disabilities and those without on measures of objective and subjective indicators of quality of life. We demonstrate that on subjective indicators of quality of life, people with disabilities consistently fare worse than those without disabilities, but that these differences are related to a range of variables. This means that we need to understand the intersection of disability with other factors such as gender and age in assessing quality of life. Following this, we argue that investments in national scale interventions such as increased access to basic amenities and social services represent investments in capability enhancement. As a result such interventions have the potential to address the needs of all, including those with disabilities, and to substantially enhance their quality of life.

Keywords

Disability Emotional well-being Life satisfaction Economic well-being 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by a grant from the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) number 58766. This study was a collaborative initiative between DFAT and the Centre for Social Development in Africa, University of Johannesburg. However, the views expressed and information contained in this report are not necessarily those of or endorsed by DFAT which can accept no responsibility for such views or information, or for any reliance thereon. The study upon which this article draws was conducted by a team of researchers. We would like to acknowledge Ms. Jacqueline Moodley, Dr. Edson Munsaka, Ms. Zenobia Ismail, Dr. Marguerite Schneider and Dr. William Rowland. Particular thanks to Jacqueline Moodley for her critical reading and feedback on drafts of the article.

References

  1. Albrecht, G. L., & Devlieger, P. J. (1999). The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Social Science and Medicine. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00411-0.Google Scholar
  2. Ardington, C., & Case, A. (2009). Health: Analysis of the NIDS wave 1 dataset. National Income Dynamics Study. Discussion Paper No. 2. www.nids.uct.ac.za/publications/discussion-papers/wave-1-papers/98-nids/discussion-paper-no02/file. Accessed April 8, 2013.
  3. Barker, R. N., Kendall, M. D., Amsters, D. I., Pershouse, K. J., Haines, T. P., & Kuipers, P. (2008). The relationship between quality of life and disability across the lifespan for people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. doi: 10.1038/sc.2008.82.Google Scholar
  4. Braithwaite, J., & Mont, D. (2009). Disability and poverty: A survey of World Bank poverty assessments and implications. ALTER-European Journal of Disability Research/Revue Européenne de Recherche Sur Le Handicap. doi: 10.1016/j.alter.2008.10.002.Google Scholar
  5. Bundy, C. (2014). What happened to transformation? (p. 36). Johannesburg: Mail & Guardian.Google Scholar
  6. Burchardt, T. (2004). Capabilities and disability: The capabilities framework and the social model of disability. Disability and Society. doi: 10.1080/0968759042000284213.Google Scholar
  7. Burns, J. (2009). Wellbeing and social cohesion: Analysis of the NIDS wave 1 dataset. National Income Dynamic Study. Discussion Paper No. 7. www.nids.uct.ac.za/publications/discussion-papers/wave-1-papers/98-nids-discussion-paper-no07/file. Accessed June 23, 2013.
  8. Camfield, L. (2004). Subjective measures of well-being for developing countries. In W. Glatzer, S. von Below, & M. Stoffregen (Eds.), Challenges for the quality of life in contemporary societies. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Camfield, L., Guillen-Royo, M., & Velazco, J. (2010). Does needs satisfaction matter for psychological and subjective wellbeing in developing countries: A mixed methods illustration from Bangladesh and Thailand. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 497–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Devey, R., & Møller, V. (2002). Closing the gap between rich and poor in South Africa: Trends in objective and subjective indicators of quality of life in the October Household Survey. In W. Glatzer (Ed.), Rich and poor (pp. 105–122). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duncan, J. (2014). The politics of counting protests (p. 31). Johannesburg: Mail & Guardian.Google Scholar
  12. Edwards, T. C., Patrick, D. L., & Topolski, T. D. (2003). Quality of life of adolescents with perceived disabilities. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsg011.Google Scholar
  13. Felce, D., & Perry, J. (1995). Quality of life: Its definition and measurement. Research Dev Disability, 16(1), 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finkenflügel, H. (2008). Prospects for community-based rehabilitation in the new millenium. In V. Møller & D. Huschka (Eds.), Quality of life and the millenium challenge (pp. 265–272). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Grech, S. (2011). Poverty and disability. Disability and Society. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2011.618747.Google Scholar
  16. Greyling, T. (2013). A composite index of the quality of life for the Gauteng city-region: A principal component analysis approach. Gauteng City-Region Observatory (GCRO) Occasional Paper Series Paper No. 7. Johannesburg: GCRO.Google Scholar
  17. Habib, A. (2014). Now the rich must do their bit (p. 7). Johannesburg: Sunday Times.Google Scholar
  18. Halpern, A. S. (1994). Quality of life for students with disabilities in transition from school to adulthood. Social Indicators Research, 33, 193–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hosain, G. M., Monawar, D., Atkinson, D., & Underwood, P. (2011). Impact of disability on quality of life of rural disabled people in Bangladesh. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition (JHPN). doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v20i4.167.Google Scholar
  20. Jongdudomkarn, D., & Camfield, L. (2006). Exploring the quality of life of people in north eastern and southern Thailand. Social Indicators Research, 78, 489–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leibbrandt, M., Woolard, I., & de Villiers, L. (2009). Methodology: Report on NIDS wave 1. Cape Town: South African Labour and Development Research Unit (SALDRU).Google Scholar
  22. Lustig, D. C., & Strauser, D. R. (2007). Causal relationships between poverty and disability. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. doi: 10.1177/00343552070500040101.Google Scholar
  23. Mangena, M. (2014). Democracy has also brought us great inequality (p. 23). Johannesburg: Mail & Guardian.Google Scholar
  24. McDougall, J., Wright, V., Schmidt, J., Miller, L., & Lowry, K. (2011). Applying the ICF framework to study changes in quality-of-life for youth with chronic conditions. Developmental Neurorehabilitation. doi: 10.3109/17518423.2010.521795.Google Scholar
  25. Midgley, J. (2013). Social development: Theory and practice. California: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mitra, S. (2006). The capability approach and disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. doi: 10.1177/10442073060160040501.Google Scholar
  27. Mitra, S., Posarac, A., & Vick, B. (2013). Disability and poverty in developing countries: A multidimensional study. World Development. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.024.Google Scholar
  28. Møller, V. (2007). Satisfied and dissatisfied South Africans: Results from the General Household Survey in international comparison. Social Indicators Research, 81, 389–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Møller, V. (2013). South African quality of life trends over three decades, 1980–2010. Social Indicators Research, 113, 915–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Møller, V., & Devey, R. (2003). Trends in living conditions and satisfaction among poorer older South Africans: Objective and subjective indicators of quality of life in the October Household Survey. Development Southern Africa, 20(4), 457–476. doi: 10.1080/0376835032000124475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mont, D., & Cuong, N. V. (2011). Disability and poverty in Vietnam. The World Bank Economic Review, 25(2), 323–359.Google Scholar
  32. National Planning Commission (NPC). (2012). National development plan-2030. Republic of South Africa: The Presidency.Google Scholar
  33. Noble, M. (2006). The Provincial Indices of multiple deprivation for South Africa 2001. United Kingdom: Centre for the Analysis of South Africa Social Policy, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  34. Noll, H.-H. (2013). Subjective social indicators: Benefits and limitations for policy making—An introduction to this special issue. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11205-013-0379-7/fulltext.html. Accessed April 16, 2014.
  35. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). OECD Economic Surveys South Africa. (2013). http://www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/South%20Africa%202013%20overview%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed May 21, 2014.
  36. Ravallion, M., & Lokshin, M. (2001). Identifying welfare effects from subjective questions. Economica. doi: 10.1111/1468-0335.00250.Google Scholar
  37. Rosano, A., Mancini, F., & Solipaco, A. (2009). Poverty in people with disabilities: Indicators from the capability approach. Social Indicators Research, 94, 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ross, E., & Deverell, A. (2010). Psychosocial issues in health, illness and disability. Pretoria: Van Schaik.Google Scholar
  39. Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. South African Labour and Development Research Unit (SALDRU). (2009). National Income Dynamics Study 2008, wave 1 [dataset]. Version 5.2. Cape Town: Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit [producer], Cape Town: DataFirst [distributor].Google Scholar
  41. Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit (SALDRU). (2014). National Income Dynamics Study 2010–2011, wave 2 [dataset]. Version 2.2. Cape Town: Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit [producer], 2014. Cape Town: DataFirst [distributor].Google Scholar
  42. Statistics South Africa. (2003). Census 2001: Census in brief. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.Google Scholar
  43. Statistics South Africa. (2012). Census in Brief. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.Google Scholar
  44. Statistics South Africa. (2014a). Quarterly Labour Force Survey for the 1st quarter of 2014. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.Google Scholar
  45. Statistics South Africa. (2014b). Census 2011: Profile of persons with disabilities in South Africa. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.Google Scholar
  46. Strine, T. W., Kroenke, K., Dhingra, S., Balluz, L. S., Gonzalez, O., Berry, J. T., & Mokdad, A. H. (2009). The associations between depression, health-Related quality of life, social support, life satisfaction, and disability in community-dwelling US adults. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181924ad8.Google Scholar
  47. United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. United Nations. http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml. Accessed June 7, 2013.
  48. Van Campen, C., & van Santvoort, M. (2013). Explaining low subjective well-being of persons with disabilities in Europe: The impact of disability, personal resources, participation and socio-economic status. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0036-6.Google Scholar
  49. Viemero, V., & Krause, C. (1998). Quality of life in individuals with physical disabilities. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. doi: 10.1159/000012297.Google Scholar
  50. Warren, N., & Manderson, L. (2013). Reframing disability and quality of life: Contextual nuances. In N. Warren & L. Manderson (Eds.), Reframing disability and quality of life (pp. 1–16). Social Indicators Research Series 52. Springer Netherlands. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-007-3018-2_1.
  51. World Health Organization (WHO). (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: WHO Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Social Development in AfricaUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations