Social Indicators Research

, Volume 127, Issue 1, pp 413–433 | Cite as

How the Poor Deal with Their Own Poverty: A Social Psychological Analysis from the Social Identity Perspective

  • Serap AkfiratEmail author
  • Filiz Çömez Polat
  • Unsal Yetim


The focus of psychological studies of poverty is usually on the psychological outcomes, causal attributions and the personality characteristics of the poor. Different from previous psychological accounts, the present study considered poverty as a group level phenomenon in the frame of Social Identity Theory, addressing the question of how poor people deal with the negative poor identity. In order to explore which of the three identity management strategies suggested by SIT (so-called individual mobility, social creativity and collective effort) would most likely be adopted by the poor to deal with the negative poor identity, a semi-structured interview study (N = 50) and a survey study (N = 170) were conducted of a sample of Turkish adults living below the poverty line, based on data from a 2011 Report of Confederation of Turkish Trade Unions (TURK-IS, 2011). The analysis of the interviews showed that when people see group boundaries as permeable and the social structure as unstable, they tend to move into higher status groups, even if they perceive the unequal social structure to be illegitimate. On the other hand, when the social structure is perceived as stable, they tend to use creative strategies. The analysis of the survey data mostly confirmed the proposed model, which suggests that a poor identity leads poor people to endorse one of the three identity management strategies through the perceptions of permeability between the poor and the wealthy, and through the perceptions of stability and illegitimacy of the status relations between the poor and the wealthy group.


Poverty Social identity Legitimacy perception Group comparison 


  1. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Collective identity: Group membership and self conception. In M. B. Brewer & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Self and social identity (pp. 147–181). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanz, M., Mummendey, A., Mielke, R., & Klink, A. (1998). Responding to negative social identity: A taxonomy of identity management strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 697–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bullock, H. E., & Waugh, I. M. (2005). Beliefs about poverty and opportunity among Mexican immigrant farm workers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1132–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carr, S.C. (2012). Anti-poverty psychology. In International and Cultural Psychology (A.C. Marsella Edt.). Newyork:Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Carr, S. C., & Bandawe, C. R. (2011). Psychology applied to poverty. In P. Martin, F. Cheung, M. Kyrios, L. Littlefield, M. Knowles, J. M. Prieto, & J. B. Overmier (Eds.), The International Association of Applied Psychology [IAAP] handbook of applied psychology (pp. 639–662). Brisbane: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corazzini, L., Esposito, L., & Majorano, F. (2011). Exploring the absolutist versus relativist perception of poverty using a cross-country questionnaire survey. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 83, 1314–1329.Google Scholar
  9. Cozzarelli, C., Wilkinson, A. V., & Tagler, M. J. (2001). Attitudes toward the poor and attributions for poverty. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 57, 119–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 27–58). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Evans, G. W., Gonnella, C., Marcynyszyn, L. A., Gentile, L., & Salpekar, N. (2005). The role of chaos in poverty and children’s socioemotional adjustment. Journal of the Associations for Psychological Science, 16, 560–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foster, J. E. (1998). Absolute versus relative poverty. American Economic Review, 88, 335–341.Google Scholar
  14. Furnham, A. (2003). Poverty and wealth. In S. C. Carr & T. S. Sloan (Eds.), Poverty and psychology: From global perspective to local practice (pp. 163–183). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hansen, M. N. (2008). Rational action theory and educational attainment. Changes in the impact of economic resources. European Sociological Review, 24, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hart, D., Atkins, R., & Matsuba, M. K. (2008). The association of neighborhood poverty with personality change in childhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 1048–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haslam, A. S. (2001). Psychology in organizations. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hollander, J. A., & Howard, J. A. (2000). Social psychological theories on social inequalities. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 338–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, C., & Novak, T. (1999). Poverty, welfare and the disciplinary state. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Sullivan, B. N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaplan, G., Shema, S., & Leite, C. (2008). Socioeconomic determinants of psychological well-being: The role of income, income change, and income sources during the course of 29 years. Annals of Epidemiology, 18, 531–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Langmore, J. (2000). Reducing poverty: The implications of the 1995 Copenhagen Agreement for research on poverty. In D. Gordon & P. Townsend (Eds.), Breadline Europe: The measurement of poverty (pp. 35–47). London: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lever, J. P., & Pinol, N. L. (2005). Poverty, psychological resources and social mobility. Revista LatinoAmericano de Psicologia, 37, 9–45.Google Scholar
  27. Lever, J. P., Pinol, L. N., & Uralde, J. H. (2005). Poverty, psychological resources and subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 73, 375–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewis, O. (1966). The culture of poverty. Scientific American, 215, 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lister, R. (2004). Poverty. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  30. Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much. New York, NY: Times Books.Google Scholar
  31. Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. (1999a). Strategies to cope with negative identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprvation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mummendey, A., Klink, A., Mielke, R., Wenzel, M., & Blanz, M. (1999b). Socio-structural characteristics of intergroup relations and identity management strategies: Results from a field study in East Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Narayan, D. (2000). Voices of the poor: Can anyone hear us?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Narayan, D., & Petesch, P. (2002). Voices of the poor: From many lands. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Plewis, I., & Bartley, M. (2014). Intragenerational social mobility and educational qualifications. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 36, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reicher, S., & Sani, F. (1998). Introducing SAGA: Strructural analyis of group analysis. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 2, 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Report of Confederation of Turkish Trade Unions (2011).
  38. Reynolds, K. J., Turner, J. C., Haslam, S. A., & Ryan, M. K. (2000). When are we better than them and they worse than us? A closer look at social discrimination in positive and negative domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 353–372.Google Scholar
  39. Rojas, M. (2008). Experienced poverty and income poverty in Mexico: A subjective well-being approach. World Development, 36, 1078–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rojas, M. (2010). Intra-household arrangements and economic satisfaction: Implications for poverty analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Kappen, D. M. (2003). Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social dominance or social identity? British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Spears, R. (2001). The interaction between the individual and the collective self. In C. Sedikides & M. Brewer (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 171–199). Philedelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  43. Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  44. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  45. Tomlinson, M., Walker, R., & Williams, G. (2008). The relationship between poverty and childhood well-being in Great Britain. Barnet Papers in Social Research. Oxford: Department of Social Policy and Social Work.Google Scholar
  46. Turkish Republic Ministry of Labor and Social Security Report (2014).
  47. Turner, J. C., & Brown, R. (1978). Social status, cognitive alternatives, and intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 201–234). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  48. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). The relationship of perceptions and emotions to behavior in the face of collective inequality. Social Justice Research, 4, 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yongmie, N. J. (2013). Psycho-social dimensions of poverty: When poverty becomes shameful. Critical Social Policy, 33, 514–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Serap Akfirat
    • 1
    Email author
  • Filiz Çömez Polat
    • 2
  • Unsal Yetim
    • 3
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentDokuz Eylül UniversityIzmirTurkey
  2. 2.Psychology Departmentİstanbul UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Psychology DepartmentMersin UniversityMersinTurkey

Personalised recommendations