Facilitating Pro-environmental Behavior: The Role of Pessimism and Anthropocentric Environmental Values

Social Indicators Research volume 126, pages1243–1260(2016)Cite this article

Abstract

The two primary aims of the present study were: (1) to test the constructive pessimism hypothesis in relation to pro-environmental behavior, and (2) to clarify the relationship between pro-environmental behavior and anthropocentric values. Specifically, we focused on the idea that pessimistic anticipation of the future might facilitate actions aimed at avoiding an undesirable future, and that it may also be effective for reducing the pessimistic outlook about the future (i.e., ‘constructive pessimism’). Results of structural equation modeling using questionnaire survey data obtained in Tsukuba City, Japan (n = 300) confirmed that pessimistic anticipation of future subjective well-being facilitated pro-environmental behavior in the present. We also confirmed that both ecocentric and anthropocentric values facilitated pro-environmental behavior. Results suggest that psychological factors surrounding pro-environmental behavior, including constructive pessimism, should be taken into consideration in developing better policy interventions to facilitate such behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2011). Factors related to household energy use and intention to reduce it: The role of psychological and socio-demographic variables. Research in Human Ecology, 18(1), 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bamberg, S. (2013). Changing environmentally harmful behaviors: A stage model of self-regulated behavioral change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 151–159. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barr, S. (2003). Strategies for sustainability: Citizens and responsible environmental behaviour. Area, 35(3), 227–240. doi:10.1111/1475-4762.00172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bentler, P. M., & Freeman, E. H. (1983). Tests for stability in linear structural equation systems. Psychometrika, 48(1), 143–145. doi:10.1007/BF02314682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonaiuto, M., & Alves, S. (2012). Residential places and neighborhoods: Toward healthy life, social integration, and reputable residence. In S. D. Clayton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 221–247). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boulding, K. E. (1966). The economics of the coming spaceship earth. In H. Jarrett (Ed.), Environmental quality in a growing economy (pp. 3–14). Baltimore: Resources for the Future/Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brown, K. W., & Kasser, T. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research, 74(2), 349–368. doi:10.1007/s11205-004-8207-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Busseri, M. A., Choma, B. L., & Sadava, S. W. (2009). “As good as it gets” or “The best is yet to come”? How optimists and pessimists view their past, present, and anticipated future life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 352–356. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Busseri, M. A., Malinowski, A., & Choma, B. L. (2013). Are optimists oriented uniquely toward the future? Investigating dispositional optimism from a temporally-expanded perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 533–538. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.04.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan, L., & Bishop, B. (2013). A moral basis for recycling: Extending the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 96–102. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cornelissen, G., Pandelaere, M., Warlop, L., & Dewitte, S. (2008). Positive cueing: Promoting sustainable consumer behavior by cueing common environmental behaviors as environmental. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(1), 46–55. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Corral Verdugo, V. (2012). The positive psychology of sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14(5), 651–666. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9346-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Corral-Verdugo, V., Mireles-Acosta, J., Tapia-Fonllem, C., & Fraijo-Sing, B. (2011). Happiness as correlate of sustainable behavior: A study of pro-ecological, frugal, equitable and altruistic actions that promote subjective wellbeing. Research in Human Ecology, 18(2), 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2009). Mean or green: Which values can promote stable pro-environmental behavior? Conservation Letters, 2(2), 61–66. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00048.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De Young, R. (1986). Some psychological aspects of recycling: The structure of conservation satisfactions. Environment and Behavior, 18(4), 435–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. De Young, R. (2000). Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 509–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., & Shwom, R. (2005). Environmental values. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 335–372. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Forgeard, M. J. C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2012). Seeing the glass half full: A review of the causes and consequences of optimism. Pratiques Psychologiques, 18, 107–120. doi:10.1016/j.prps.2012.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Giorgetta, C., Grecucci, A., Zuanon, S., Perini, L., Balestrieri, M., Bonini, N., & Brambilla, P. (2012). Reduced risk-taking behavior as a trait feature of anxiety. Emotion, 12(6), 1373–1383. doi:10.1037/a0029119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gomez, V., Grob, A., & Orth, U. (2013). The adaptive power of the present: Perceptions of past, present, and future life satisfaction across the life span. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 626–633. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hansla, A., Gamble, A., Juliusson, A., & Gärling, T. (2008). The relationships between awareness of consequences, environmental concern, and value orientations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Honold, J., Beyer, R., Lakes, T., & van der Meer, E. (2012). Multiple environmental burdens and neighborhood-related health of city residents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 305–317. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hope, A. L. B., & Jones, C. R. (2014). The impact of religious faith on attitudes to environmental issues and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technologies: A mixed methods study. Technology in Society, 38, 48–59. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report (p. 104). Geneva: IPCC.

  29. Isaacowitz, D. M., & Seligman, M. E. (2001). Is pessimism a risk factor for depressive mood among community-dwelling older adults? Behaviour research and therapy, 39(3), 255–272. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11227808

  30. Jacob, J., Jovic, E., & Brinkerhoff, M. B. (2009). Personal and planetary well-being: Mindfulness meditation, pro-environmental behavior and personal quality of life in a survey from the social justice and ecological sustainability movement. Social Indicators Research, 93, 275–294. doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9308-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaida, N., & Kaida, K. (2015). Pro-environmental behavior correlates with present and future subjective well-being. Environment, Development and Sustainability. doi:10.1007/s10668-015-9629-y.

  32. Kals, E., & Müller, M. M. (2012). Emotions and environment. In S. D. Clayton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 128–147). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kesebir, P., & Diener, E. (2008). In pursuit of happiness: Empirical answers to philosophical questions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 117–125. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00069.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee, Y.-J., & De Young, R. (1993). Intrinsic satisfaction derived from office recycling behavior: A case study in Taiwan. Social Indicators Research, 31, 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2014). Goal-framing theory and norm-guided environmental behavior. In H. C. M. van Trijp (Ed.), Encouraging sustainable behavior: Psychology and the environment (pp. 37–54). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Maldonado, T. (1972). Design, nature, and revolution: Toward a critical ecology. New York: Harper & Row. Retrieved from http://books.google.co.jp/books/about/Design_nature_and_revolution.html?id=_MEiAAAAMAAJ&pgis=1

  37. McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2000). Promoting sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 543–554. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/0022-4537.00183

  38. Milfont, T. L., & Duckitt, J. (2010). The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 80–94. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2009). Family income and expenditure survey. Retrieved August 04, 2014, from http://www.e-stat.go.jp

  40. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2010). Population census. Retrieved August 04, 2014, from http://www.e-stat.go.jp

  41. Ministry of Land Infrastructure Transport and Tourism of Japan. (2008). Living life general survey results (p. 182). Tokyo. Retrieved from http://www.mlit.go.jp/common/000132799.pdf

  42. Moser, G. (2009). Quality of life and sustainability: Toward person–environment congruity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 351–357. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2002). Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34(6), 740–756. doi:10.1177/001391602237244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2003). Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(4), 339–347. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00037-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. O’Brien, C. (2008). Sustainable happiness: How happiness studies can contribute to a more sustainable future. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(4), 289–295. doi:10.1037/a0013235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ojala, M. (2013). Coping with climate change among adolescents: Implications for subjective well-being and environmental engagement. Sustainability, 5(5), 2191–2209. doi:10.3390/su5052191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Olli, E., Grendstad, G., & Wollebaek, D. (2001). Correlates of environmental behaviors: Bringing back social context. Environment and Behavior, 33(2), 181–208. doi:10.1177/0013916501332002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ortega Egea, J. M., & Garcia de Frutos, N. (2013). Toward consumption reduction: An environmentally motivated perspective. Psychology and Marketing, 30(8), 660–675. doi:10.1002/mar.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Oskamp, S., Harringson, M. J., Edwards, T. C., Sherwood, D. L., Okuda, S. M., & Swanson, D. C. (1991). Factors influencing household recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior, 23(4), 494–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Social Indicators Research, 39, 101–117. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010a). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1–10. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494409000620

  52. Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010b). The relations between natural and civic place attachment and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 289–297. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Conern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327–339. doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Schultz, P. W., Gouveia, V. V., Cameron, Li, Tankha, D., Schmuck, P., & Franek, M. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 457–475. doi:10.1177/0022022105275962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Schultz, P. W., Oskamp, S., & Mainieri, T. (1995). Who recycles and when? A review of personal and situational factors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(2), 105–121. doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90019-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221–279). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Seligman, M. E. P., Railton, P., Baumeister, R. F., & Sripada, C. (2013). Navigating into the future or driven by the past. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(2), 119–141. doi:10.1177/1745691612474317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Snelgar, R. S. (2006). Egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric environmental concerns: Measurement and structure. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(2), 87–99. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Steg, L., & de Groot, J. I. M. (2012). Environmental values. In S. Clayton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 81–92). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Stern, P. C. (1999). Information, incentives, and proenvironmental consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Policy, 22, 461–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Research in Human Ecology, 6(2), 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Story, P. A., & Forsyth, D. R. (2008). Watershed conservation and preservation: Environmental engagement as helping behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(4), 305–317. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Tabernero, C., & Hernandez, B. (2011). Self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation guiding environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 43(5), 658–675. doi:10.1177/0013916510379759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Tapia-Fonllem, C., Corral-Verdugo, V., Fraijo-Sing, B., & Durón-Ramos, M. F. (2013). Assessing sustainable behavior and its correlates: A measure of pro-ecological, frugal, altruistic and equitable actions. Sustainability, 5(2), 711–723. doi:10.3390/su5020711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Tartaglia, S. (2012). Different predictors of quality of life in urban environment. Social Indicators Research, 113(3), 1045–1053. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0126-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Thøgersen, J. (2005). How may consumer policy empower consumers for sustainable lifestyles? Journal of Consumer Policy, 28(2), 143–177. doi:10.1007/s10603-005-2982-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Thøgersen, J. (2006). Norms for environmentally responsible behaviour: An extended taxonomy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 247–261. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Thompson, S. C. G., & Barton, M. A. (1994). Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. UN General Assembly. (2012). The Future we want (Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 27 July 2012). The United Nations (p. 53). New York: UN General Assembly.

  72. UNEP. (2012a). Global outlook on sustainable consumption and production policies: Taking action together. UNEP (p. 220). Nairobi: UNEP.

  73. UNEP. (2012b). 21 Issues for the 21st century: Results of the UNEP foresight process on emerging environmental issues (p. 56). Nairobi: UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Venhoeven, L. A., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2013). Explaining the paradox: How pro-environmental behaviour can both thwart and foster well-being. Sustainability, 5, 1372–1386. doi:10.3390/su5041372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Wakefield, S. E. L., Elliott, S. J., Eyles, J. D., & Cole, D. C. (2006). Taking environmental action: The role of local composition, context, and collective. Environmental Management, 37(1), 40–53. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0323-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Wallach, M. A., & Wallach, L. (1983). Psychology’s sanction for selfishness: The error of egoism in theory and therapy. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Zelenski, J. M., & Nisbet, E. K. (2012). Happiness and feeling connected: The distinct role of nature relatedness. Environment and Behavior, 46(1), 3–23. doi:10.1177/0013916512451901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, Information and Systems, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 3058573, Japan

    Naoko Kaida

  2. Human Technology Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba Central 6-11, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 3058566, Japan

    Kosuke Kaida

Authors
  1. Naoko Kaida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kosuke Kaida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoko Kaida.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaida, N., Kaida, K. Facilitating Pro-environmental Behavior: The Role of Pessimism and Anthropocentric Environmental Values. Soc Indic Res 126, 1243–1260 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0943-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Pro-environmental behavior
  • Constructive pessimism
  • Environmental values
  • Anthropocentrism
  • Ecocentrism
  • Neighborhood environment
  • Subjective well-being
  • Happiness