Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 126, Issue 3, pp 1375–1399 | Cite as

The Structure of Subjective Well-Being and Its Determinants: A Micro-Data Study for Portugal

  • Elias SoukiazisEmail author
  • Sara Ramos
Article

Abstract

The Subjective Well-Being status has gained a growing research attention in social sciences during the last decades. The attention given by the academic world to this issue has been followed by the community in general. This line of research is still undeveloped in Portugal, and therefore needs further investigation. The purpose of this study is to analyze the determinants of Life Satisfaction and Happiness, two dimensions of Subjective Well-Being of the Portuguese citizens using micro-data from the European Quality of Life Survey. Ordinary Least Squares regressions and Ordinal Logistic models are estimated to identify the main factors that explain well-being in Portugal. We find that trust in public institutions, satisfaction with material conditions, volunteering activities and employment status have a positive and significant effect on Life Satisfaction. Our evidence also shows that satisfaction with family, satisfaction with material conditions, participation in sport activities, optimism and the marital status are relevant factors in explaining citizen’s Happiness in Portugal. The results are similar using Ordinary Least Squares or Maximum Likelihood estimation techniques on ordinal logistic models.

Keywords

Factor analysis Happiness Life satisfaction Ordinal logit models Subjective Well-Being 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to two anonymous referees for their useful comments and suggestions. We acknowledge the free access of data provided by the European Quality of Life Survey. UK Data Services at University of Essex, Colchester is the data archive. The European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions is simultaneously the depositor, the principal investigator and the sponsor (http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7316-1).

References

  1. Albuquerque, I., de Lima, M. P., Matos, M., & Figueiredo, C. (2012). Personality and subjective well-being: What hides behind global analyses? Social Indicators Research, 105(3), 447–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albuquerque, I., de Lima, M. P., Matos, M., & Figueiredo, C. (2013). The interplay among levels of personality: The mediator effect of personal projects between the big five and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9–10), 2009–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allardt, E. (1976). Dimensions of welfare in a comparative Scandinavian study. Acta Sociologica, 19(3), 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amemiya, T. (1981). Qualitative response models. Journal of Economic Literature, 19, 1483–1536.Google Scholar
  6. Bartels, M., & Boomsma, D. I. (2009). Born to be happy? The etiology of subjective well-being. Behavior Genetics, 39(6), 605–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2008). On decentralization and life satisfaction. Economics Letters, 99(1), 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2010). Formal institutions and subjective well-being: Revisiting the cross-country evidence. European Journal of Political Economy, 26(4), 419–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2008). Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? Social Science and Medicine, 66(8), 1733–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. Economic Journal, 104(424), 648–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61(3), 359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cummins, R. A., Li, N., Wooden, M., & Stokes, M. (2014). A demonstration of set-points for subjective wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(1), 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daykin, A. R., & Moffatt, P. G. (2002). Analyzing ordered responses: A review of the ordered probit model. Understanding Statistics, 1(3), 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delhey, J., & Dragolov, G. (2014). Why inequality makes Europeans less happy: The role of distrust, status anxiety, and perceived conflict. European Sociological Review, 30(2), 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. J., & Oswald, A. J. (2003). The macroeconomics of happiness. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 809–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diaz-Serrano, L. (2009). Disentangling the housing satisfaction puzzle: Does homeownership really matter? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(5), 745–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diaz-Serrano, L., & Stoyanova, A. P. (2010). Mobility and housing satisfaction: an empirical analysis for 12 EU countries. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(5), 661–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(2), 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diener, E., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24(1), 25–41.Google Scholar
  22. Easterlin, R. A. (2003). Explaining happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(19), 11176–11183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, European Quality of Life Survey, 2011–2012 [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], July 2013. SN: 7316, doi: 10.5255/UKDA-SN-7316-1
  24. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5–6), 997–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Economic Journal, 114(497), 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Gowdy, J. M. (2007). Environmental degradation and happiness. Ecological Economics, 60(3), 509–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Field, A. P. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110(466), 918–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2005). Happiness research: State and prospects. Review of Social Economy, 63(2), 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2010). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Galinha, I. C., & Pais-Ribeiro, J. L. (2005). History and evolution of the concept of subjective well-being. Psicologia, Saúde & Doenças, 6(2), 203–214.Google Scholar
  33. Galinha, I. C., & Pais-Ribeiro, J. L. (2008). The structure and stability of subjective well-being: A structure equation modelling analysis. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 3(4), 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Galinha, I. C., & Pais-Ribeiro, J. L. (2011). Cognitive, affective and contextual predictors of subjective well-being. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(1), 34–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gerdtham, U.-G., & Johannesson, M. (2001). The relationship between happiness, health, and socio-economic factors: Results based on Swedish microdata. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 30(6), 553–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics. NY: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  37. Gundelach, P., & Kreiner, S. (2004). Happiness and life satisfaction in advanced European countries. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(4), 359–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Haller, M., & Hadler, M. (2006). How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: An international comparative analysis. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 169–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20(2), 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 359(1449), 1435–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hudson, J. (2006). Institutional trust and subjective well-being across the EU. Kyklos, 59(1), 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness: A global perspective (1981–2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 264–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  44. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lelkes, O. (2006). Knowing what is good for you: Empirical analysis of personal preferences and the «objective good». The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2), 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lopes, H., Calapez, T., & Porto, C. (2014). Does the macroeconomic context influence subjective well-being in Europe and Portugal? The puzzling case of the 2008 crisis. Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 13(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 616–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7(3), 186–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Meier, S., & Stutzer, A. (2008). Is volunteering rewarding in itself? Economica, 75(297), 39–59.Google Scholar
  51. Myers, D. G. (2000). The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. American Psychologist, 55(1), 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science (Wiley-Blackwell), 6(1), 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  54. Oswald, A. J. (1997). Happiness and economic performance*. The Economic Journal, 107(445), 1815–1831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pais-Ribeiro, J. (2004). Quality of life is a primary end-point in clinical settings. Clinical Nutrition, 23, 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pereira, M. C., & Coelho, F. (2013). Untangling the relationship between income and subjective well-being: The role of perceived income adequacy and borrowing constraints. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(3), 985–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pichler, F. (2006). Subjective quality of life of young Europeans. Feeling happy but who knows why? Social Indicators Research, 75(3), 419–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Puntscher, S., Hauser, C., Walde, J., & Tappeiner, G. (2014). The impact of social capital on subjective well-being: A regional perspective. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s10902-014-9555-y
  59. Rasciute, S., & Downward, P. (2010). Health or happiness? What is the impact of physical activity on the individual? Kyklos, 63(2), 256–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rözer, J., & Kraaykamp, G. (2013). Income inequality and subjective well-being: A cross-national study on the conditional effects of individual and national characteristics. Social Indicators Research, 113(3), 1009–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2000). Value priorities and subjective well-being: Direct relations and congruity effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(2), 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schafer, J. L. (1999). Multiple imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Silva, A. D., do Ceu Taveira, M., Marques, C., & Gouveia, V. V. (2015). Satisfaction with life scale among adolescents and young adults in Portugal: Extending evidence of construct validity. Social Indicators Research, 120(1), 309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sirgy, M. J. (1998). Materialism and quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 43(3), 227–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stanca, L. (2010). The geography of economics and happiness: Spatial patterns in the effects of economic conditions on well-being. Social Indicators Research, 99(1), 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Veenhoven, R. (1991). Questions on happiness: Classical topics, modern answers, blind spots. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (p. 13). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  67. Veenhoven, R. (1996). Happy life-expectancy. Social Indicators Research, 39(1), 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Veenhoven, R. (1999). Quality-of-life in individualistic society. Social Indicators Research, 48(2), 159–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wolfers, J. (2003). Is business cycle volatility costly? Evidence from surveys of subjective well-being. International Finance, 6(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ye, D., Ng, Y.-K., & Lian, Y. (2014). Culture and Happiness. Social Indicators Research, 1–29. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0747-y

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EconomyUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations