Relative Income, Relative Assets, and Happiness in Urban China
- 1.4k Downloads
Does more money always mean that people are happier with their lives? To test the social comparison hypothesis as applied to happiness, this study uses survey data from the 2002 Chinese Household Income Project to examine the association between household economic resources and happiness in urban China. Household economic resources are measured as both income and assets (e.g., net worth and net worth minus home equity). In addition, the analyses include measures of relative income and relative assets. Results of ordinary least square regression analysis show a positive association of absolute income with the happiness score whereas relative income is negatively associated with happiness. Although household assets are a significant and positive predictor of self-assessments of happiness, measures of relative household assets do not correlate with happiness. Study findings suggest the level of happiness among urban populations could be increased through policies that promote pro-poor growth and equal distribution of economic resources. In addition, introducing asset-building policies as supplements to other social assistance programs may promote happiness.
KeywordsAssets Happiness Income Life satisfaction Relative assets Relative income
- Alesina, A., Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. J. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2009–2042.Google Scholar
- Bannister, J. (1987). China’s Changing population. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Becchetti, L., & Pelloni, A. (2011). What are we learning from the life satisfaction literature? Government of the Italian Republic (Italy), Ministry of Economy and Finance, Department of the Treasury Working Paper, (2).Google Scholar
- Cheng, Y. (2007). Word by word China’s communist party touches up “Xiao Kang” blueprint. Beijing: Xinhuanet. Retrieved from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-10/12/content_6872116.htm. Accessed 14 Nov 2014.
- China Family Panel Studies. (2014). The 2014 China welfare development report. Beijing: China Family Panel Studies, Peking University.Google Scholar
- China National Bureau of Statistics. (2014). The 2013 national bureau of statistics report. Beijing: China National Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
- Hu, Z. (2012). Chinese happiness index and its influencing factors analysis. Stockholm: KTH Industrial Engineering and Management.Google Scholar
- Li, S., & Zhao, R. (2007). Changes in the distribution of wealth in China, 1995–2002 (United Nations University-World Institute for Development Economics Research paper 2007/03). Helsinki: United Nations University.Google Scholar
- Nam, Y., Huang, J., & Sherraden, M. (2008). Asset definitions. In S.-M. McKernan & M. Sherraden (Eds.), Asset building and low-income families (pp. 1–32). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
- United Nation Development Funds. (2008). Human development report 2007/2008: Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
- Warren-Cash, C. (2012). Want to Capitalize on China? You better have good Guanxi. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/languatica/2012/03/15/want-to-capitalize-on-china-you-better-have-good-guanxi/. Accessed 14 Nov 2014.
- Xinhuanet. (2008). Hu Jintao calls for innovations in publicity and ideological work. Beijing: Xinhuanet. Retrieved from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-01/22/content_7474973.htm. Accessed 14 Nov 2014.
- Xuequan, M. (2010). Premier Wen urges to narrow wealth gaps [Editorial]. Beijing: Xinhuanet. Retrieved from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2010-10/28/c_13580549.htm. Last accessed 14 Nov 2014.
- Yuen, L. (2013). Communist party membership is still the ultimate resume booster. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/china/archive/2013/05/communist-party-membership-is-still-the-ultimate-resume-booster/276347/. Accessed 14 Nov 2014.
- Zhao, R., & Ding, S. (2008). The distribution of wealth in China. In B. Gustafsson, S. Li, & T. Sicular (Eds.), Inequality and public policy in China (pp. 118–144). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar