Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 126, Issue 3, pp 1025–1048 | Cite as

Marriage and Subjective Well-Being: How and Why Context Matters

  • Tim WadsworthEmail author
Article

Abstract

Over the last 20 years the academic community has experienced a burgeoning interest in the causes and correlates of subjective well-being. One of the most consistent findings has been that married respondents report higher levels of happiness and life satisfaction than unmarried respondents. Despite its prevalence, scant empirical research has focused on the potential mechanisms driving this relationship. The current work draws on the Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System along with 2000 US Census data to investigate the role of context and reference groups in shaping the relationship between marriage and well-being. The primary research question is whether marriage has a greater influence on life satisfaction when it is more common and thus more normative? The findings offer new insight into the marriage/well-being relationship and have broad implication for how we think about the study of the causes and correlates of subjective well-being.

Keywords

Subjective well-being Life satisfaction Marriage Normative achievement Happiness Norms 

References

  1. Antonovics, K., & Town, R. (2004). Are all the good men married? Uncovering the sources of the marital wage premium. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 317–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aughinbaugh, A., O. Robles, & Hugette, S. (2013) Marriage and divorce: patterns by gender, race and educational attainment. Monthly Labor Review. http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2013/article/marriage-and-divorce-patterns-by-gender-race-and-educational-attainment.htm
  3. Bellas, M. L. (1992). The effects of marital status and wives’ employment on the salaries of faculty men: The (house) wife bonus. Gender and Society, 6(4), 609–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blakemore, J., Lawton, C. A., & Vartanian, L. R. (2005). I can’t wait to get married: Gender differences in drive to marry. Sex Roles, 53, 327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Money, sex and happiness: An empirical study”. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 393–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2006). Behavioral risk factors surveillance system. Operational and user’s guide, version 3.0. Google Scholar
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). Behavioral risk factor surveillance system. Atlanta, GA: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/
  8. Cherlin, A. J. (2009). The marriage-go-around: The state of marriage and family in America today. New York, NY: Random House Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Conley, T. D., & Collins, B. E. (2002). Gender, relationship status, and stereotyping about sexual risk. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1483–1494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Connidis, I. A. (2001). Family ties and aging. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2005). Singles in society and in science. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 57–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dolan, P., & Peasgood, T. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of Moses Abramowitz. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Economic Journal, 111, 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Easterlin, R. A. (2003). Explaining happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(19), 11176–11183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Eggebeen, D., & Dew, J. (2009). The role of religion in adolescence for family formation in young adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(1), 108–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Firebaugh, G., & Tach, L. (2008). Income, age and happiness in America. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Social trends in the United States 1972–2006: Evidence from the General Social Survey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110, 918–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2005). Happiness research: State and prospects. Review of Social Economy, 63(2), 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fussel, E., & Furstenberg, F. (2005). The transition to adulthood during the twentieth century: Race, nativity, and gender. In R. A. Settersten, F. F. Furstenberg, & R. G. Rumbaut (Eds.), On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Graham, C., & Pettinato, S. (2002). Frustrated achievers: Winners, losers and subjective well being in new market economies. Journal of Development Studies, 38, 100–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haring-Hidore, M., Stock, W. A., Okun, M. A., & Witter, R. A. (1985). Marital status and subjective well-being: A research synthesis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 947–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hope, S., Rodgers, B., & Power, C. (1999). Marital status transitions and psychological distress: Longitudinal evidence from a national population sample. Psychological Medicine, 29(2), 381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jocklin, V., McGue, M., & Lykken, D. T. (1996). Personality and divorce: A genetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 288–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lucas, R., & Clark, A. (2006). Do people really adapt to marriage? Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(4), 405–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 527–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luttmer, E. F. P. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 963–1002.Google Scholar
  30. McBride, M. (2001). Relative-income effects on subjective well-being in the cross section. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 45, 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Messner, S. F., & Rosenfeld, R. (1997). Crime and the American dream. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  32. Morris, W. L., DePaulo, B. M., Hertel, J., & Taylor, L. C. (2008). Singlism—Another problem that has no name: Prejudice, stereotypes, and discrimination against singles. In M. A. Morrison & T. G. Morrison (Eds.), The psychology of modern prejudice (pp. 165–194). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Morris, W. L., Sinclair, S., & DePaulo, B. M. (2007). No shelter for singles: The perceived legitimacy of marital status discrimination. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 457–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nilsen, A. P. (1977). Sexism in the language of marriage. In A. P. Nilsen, H. Bosmajian, H. I. Gershuny, & J. P. Stanley (Eds.), Sexism and language (pp. 131–140). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  35. Oswald, A. J., & Wu, S. (2010). Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: Evidence from the USA. Bonn: IZA.Google Scholar
  36. Reynolds, J., & Wetherell, M. (2003). The discursive climate of singleness: The consequences for women’s negotiation of a single identity. Feminism and Psychology, 13, 489–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Uecker, J. E. (2014). Religion and early marriage in the United States: Evidence from the Add Health Study. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 53(2), 392–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. U.S. Census Bureau, Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division, Fertility & Family Statistics Branch. (2010). Families and living arrangements. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hh-fam.html.
  39. Vaaler, M. L., Ellison, C. G., & Powers, D. A. (2009). Religious influences on the risk of marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(4), 917–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Veblen, T. (1899). Theory of the leisure Class: An economic study in the evolution of institutions. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Veenhoven, R. (1994). World database of happiness: Correlates of happiness. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.Google Scholar
  42. Wadsworth, T. (2013). Sex and the Pursuit of Happiness: How Other People's Sex Lives are Related to our Sense of Well-Being. Social Indicators Research, 116, 115–135.Google Scholar
  43. Wadsworth, T., & Pendergast, P. (2014). Obesity (sometimes) matters: The importance of context in the relationship between obesity and life satisfaction. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 55, 196–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Waite, L. J. (1995). Does marriage matter? Demography, 32, 483–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  46. Wildman, J., & Jones, A. (2002). Is it absolute income or relative deprivation that leads to poor psychological well-being? A test based on individual-level longitudinal data. York: University of York, YSHE.Google Scholar
  47. Witter, R. A., Stock, W. A., Okun, M. A., & Haring, M. J. (1985). Religion and subjective well-being in adulthood: A quantitative synthesis. Review of Religious Research, 26(4), 332–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of Colorado at BoulderBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations