Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 126, Issue 3, pp 1209–1224 | Cite as

Why People Like Where They Live: Individual- and Community-Level Contributors to Community Satisfaction

  • Brittany M. FitzEmail author
  • Larry Lyon
  • Robyn Driskell
Article

Abstract

Using multi-level modeling in 26 communities, this study examines contributors to three domains of community satisfaction—overall satisfaction, social life satisfaction, and infrastructure satisfaction. Human capital/demographic and social capital/network contributors emerge at both the individual and community levels in accounting for variation in community satisfaction. Some effects remain the same across levels and domains, but some effects differ. For example, living near family members increases satisfaction in all domains at the individual level, but at the community level, it decreases satisfaction in all domains. Residing in communities high in urbanicity reduces overall satisfaction, but has no effect on infrastructure satisfaction. Moreover, both individual and community level factors matter and impact community satisfaction.

Keywords

Community Satisfaction Domains of satisfaction Multi-level modeling 

References

  1. Aviram, R. (2009). The relational origins of prejudice: A convergence of psychoanalytic and social cognitive perspectives. Lanham, MD: Jarson Aronson.Google Scholar
  2. Bardo, A., & Yamashita, T. (2014). Validity of domain satisfaction across cohorts in the US. Social Indicators Research, 117(2), 367–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belsky, E. S. (2013). The dream lives on: The future of homeownership in America. Working Paper W11=4ed. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies.Google Scholar
  4. Bramley, G., & Karley, N. (2007). Homeownership, poverty, and educational achievement: School effects as neighbourhood effects. Housing Studies, 22(5), 693–721.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, R., Dorins, S., & Krannich, R. (2005). The boom-bust-recovery cycle: Dynamics of change in community satisfaction and social integration in Delta, Utah. Rural Sociology, 70(1), 28–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, A., Converse, P., & Rodgers, W. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfaction. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Christakopoulou, S., Dawson, J., & Gari, A. (2001). The community well-being questionnaire: Theoretical context and initial assessment of its reliability and validity. Social Indicators Research, 56(3), 321–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crowe, J. (2010). Community attachment and satisfaction: The role of a community’s social network structure. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(5), 622–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Acci, L. (2013). Monetary, subjective and quantitative approaches to assess urban quality of life and lleasantness in cities (hedonic price, willingness-to-pay, positional value, life satisfaction, isobenefit lines). Social Indicators Research, 115(2), 531–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DiPasquale, D., & Glaeser, E. (1999). Incentives and social capital: Are homeowners better citizens? Journal of Urban Economics, 45(2), 354–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fields, D., Justa, F., Libman, K., Sargert, S., & Clark, H. (2007). Understanding responses to the threat of foreclosure among low income homeowners. New York: Center for Human Environment, Graduate Center of the City University of New York.Google Scholar
  12. Filkins, R., Allen, J., & Cordes, S. (2000). Predicting community satisfaction among rural residents: An integrative model. Rural Sociology, 65(1), 72–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fischer, C. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Flaherty, J., & Brown, R. (2010). A multilevel systemic model of community attachment: Assessing the relative importance of the community and individual levels. American Journal of Sociology, 116(2), 503–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fried, M. (1982). Residential attachment: Sources of residential and community satisfaction. Journal of Social Issues, 38(3), 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Friedman, Thomas L. (2007). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century (updated and expanded). New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux press.Google Scholar
  17. Greif, M. (2009). Neighborhood attachment in the multiethnic metropolis. City and Community., 8(1), 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grillo, M., Teixeira, M., & Wilson, D. (2010). Residential satisfaction and civic engagement: Understanding the causes of community participation. Social Indicators Research, 97(3), 451–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grinstein-Weiss, M., Key, C., Yeo, Y., Yoo, J., Holub, K., Taylor, A., & Tucker, J. (2012). Homeownership, neighbourhood characteristics and children’s positive behaviours among low- and moderate-income households. Urban Studies, 49(16), 3545–3563.Google Scholar
  20. Guest, A., Cover, J., Matsueda, R., & Kubrin, C. (2006). Neighborhood context and neighboring ties. City and Community, 5(4), 363–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (2003). Neighboring in netville: How the internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City and Community, 2(4), 277–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haurin, D., Parcel, T., & Haurin, J. (2002). Does homeownership affect child outcomes? Real Estate Economics, 30(4), 635–666.Google Scholar
  23. Holupka, S., & Newman, S. (2012). The effects of homeownership on children’s outcomes: Real effect or self-selection? Real Estate Economics, 40(3), 566–602.Google Scholar
  24. James, O. (2011). Performance measures and democracy: Information effects of citizens in field and laboratory experiments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 399–418.Google Scholar
  25. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919.Google Scholar
  26. Kusenbach, M. (2008). A hierarchy of urban communities: Observations on the nested character of place. City and Community, 7(3), 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Long, A., & Perkins, D. (2007). Community social and place predictors of sense of community: A multilevel and longitudinal analysis. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(5), 563–581.Google Scholar
  28. Long, D., & Perkins, D. (2003). Confirmatory factor analysis of the sense of community index and development of a brief SCI. Journal of Community Psychology, 31(3), 279–296.Google Scholar
  29. Lyon, L., & Driskell, R. (2012). The community in urban society. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lyons, W.E., Lowery, D., & DeHoog, R. (1993). The politics of dissatisfaction: Citizens, services, and urban institutions. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  31. MacArthur Foundation (2013). “How housing matters: Americans’ attitudes transformed by the housing crisis, changes in lifestyles.” http://www.macfound.org/press/press-releases/how-housingmatters-survey-finds-american-attitudes-transformed-housing-crisis-changes-lifestyle/.
  32. Mellander, C., Florida, R., & Stolarick, K. (2011). Here to stay: The effects of community satisfaction on the decision to stay. Spatial Economic Analysis, 6(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morton, L. (2003). Small town services and facilities: The influence of social networks and civic structure on perceptions of quality. City and Community, 2(2), 102–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Neal, Z., & Neal, J. (2012). The public school as a public good: Direct and indirect pathways to community satisfaction. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(5), 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Newman, S., & Harkness, J. (2002). The long-term effects of public housing on self-sufficiency. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(1), 21–43.Google Scholar
  36. Oldenburg, R. (1999). The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. Washington, DC: Marlowe & Company.Google Scholar
  37. Parkes, A., Kearns, A., & Atkinson, R. (2002). What makes people dissatisfied with their neighbourhoods? Urban Studies, 39(13), 2413–2438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pollack, C., & Lynch, J. (2009). Health status of people undergoing foreclosure in the philadelphia region. American Journal of Public Health, 99(10), 1833–1839.Google Scholar
  39. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rappaport, J. (2009). The increasing importance of quality of life. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(6), 779–804.Google Scholar
  41. Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Riffkin, R., (2014). City satisfaction highest in Fort Collins-Loveland, Colo. Gallup. http://www.gallup.com/poll/168485/city-satisfaction-highest-fort-collins-loveland-colo.aspx.
  43. Roskruge, M., Grimes, A., McCann, P., & Poot, J. (2012). Social capital and regional social infrastructure investment: Evidence from New Zealand. International Regional Science Review, 35(1), 3–25.Google Scholar
  44. Rossi, P., & Weber, E. (1996). The social benefits of homeownership: Empirical evidence from national surveys. Housing Policy Debate, 7(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
  45. Ruth, M., & Franklin, R. (2014). Livability for all? Conceptual limits and practical implications. Applied Geography, 49, 18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sirgy, M., & Cornwell, T. (2002). How neighborhood features affect quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 59(1), 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sirgy, M., Rahtz, D., Cicic, M., & Underwood, R. (2000). A method for assessing residents’ satisfaction with community-based services: A quality-of-life perspective. Social Indicators Research, 49(3), 279–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sirgy, M., & Wu, J. (2009). The pleasant life, the engaged life, and the meaningful life: What about the balanced life? Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(2), 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sloane, P. J., & Williams, H. (2000). Job satisfaction, comparison earnings, and gender. Labour, 14(3), 473–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. The Knight Foundation. (2010). Why people love where they live and why it matters: A national perspective. http://www.soulofthecommunity.org/sites/default/files/OVERALL.pdf.
  51. Theodori, G. (2001). Examining the effects of community satisfaction and attachment on individual well-being. Rural Sociology, 66(4), 618–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tonnies, F. (1887). Community and society. Mineola, NY: Courier Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  53. Toth, J., Brown, B., & Xu, X. (2002). Separate family and community realities? An urban-rural comparison of the association between family life satisfaction and community satisfaction. Community, Work and Family, 5(2), 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyBaylor UniversityWacoUSA

Personalised recommendations