Social Indicators Research

, Volume 125, Issue 3, pp 813–851 | Cite as

Women’s Political Empowerment and Investments in Primary Schooling in India

  • Nafisa Halim
  • Kathryn M. Yount
  • Solveig A. Cunningham
  • Rohini P. Pande
Article

Abstract

Using a national district-level dataset of India composed of information on investments in primary schooling [data from the District Information Survey for Education (DISE, 2007/8)] and information on demographic characteristics of elected officials [data from the Election Commission of India (ECI, 2000/04)], we examined the relationship between women’s representation in State Legislative Assembly (SLA) seats and district-level investments in primary schooling. We used OLS regressions adjusting for confounders and spatial autocorrelation, and estimated separate models for North and South India. Women’s representation in general SLA seats typically was negatively associated with investments in primary-school amenities and teachers; women’s representation in SLA seats reserved for under-represented minorities, i.e., scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, typically was positively associated with investments in primary schooling, especially in areas addressing the basic needs of poor children. Women legislators’ gender and caste identities may shape their decisions about redistributive educational policies.

Keywords

Gender India Intersectionality Political representation Primary schooling Redistributive policies 

References

  1. Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender and Society, 20(4), 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anandhi, S. (1991). Women’s question in the Dravidian Movement c. 1925–1948. Social Scientist, 19(5/6), 24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Boston, M.A.: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ban, R., & Rao, V. (2008). Tokenism or agency? The impact of women’s reservations on village democracies in south India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 56(3), 501–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banerjee, A., & Iyer, L. (2005). History, institutions, and economic performance: The legacy of colonial land tenure systems in India. American Economic Review, 95(4), 1190–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banerjee, A., Somanathan, R., & Pande, R. (2007). The political economy of public goods: Some evidence from India. Journal of Development Economics, 82, 287–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bardhan, P. (1996). Efficiency, equity and poverty alleviation: Policy issues in less developed countries. The Economic Journal, 106(438), 1344–1356.Google Scholar
  8. Barrett, E. J. (1995). The policy priorities of African American women in state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 20(2), 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baviskar, B. S. (2005). Impact of women’s participation in local governance in rural India. In L. C. Jain (Ed.), Decentralization and local governance (pp. 329–342). New Delhi: Longman.Google Scholar
  10. Besley, T., & Coate, S. (1997). An economic model of representative democracy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(11), 85–114.Google Scholar
  11. Besley, T., Pande, R., & Rao, V. (2004). The politics of public good provision: Evidence from Indian local governments. Journal of the European Economics Association Papers and Proceedings, 2(2–3), 416–426.Google Scholar
  12. Bester, A. C., Conley, T. G., & Hansen, C. B. (2011). Inference with dependent data using cluster covariance estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 165(2), 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bhalotra, S., Clots-Figueras, I., Cassan, G., & Iyer, L. (2014). Religion, politician identity and development outcomes: Evidence from India. Journal of Public Economics, 104, 4–17.Google Scholar
  14. Beteille, A. (1969). Social inequality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  15. Bolzendahl, C. (2011). Beyond the big picture: gender influences on disaggregated and domain-specific measures of social spending, 1980–1999. Politics and Gender, 7, 35–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bonu, S., Rani, M., Peters, D. H., & Baker, T. D. (2011). Empowering the socially excluded in rural local governments: An exploratory study from a State in India. Journal of International Development, 23, 42–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bose, S. B., & Singh, V. B. (1988a). State elections in India: Data handbook on Vidhan Sabha elections 1952-85: The East and Northeast. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Bose, S. B., & Singh, V. B. (1988b). State elections in India: Data handbook on Vidhan Sabha Elections 1952-85: The North Part II. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Bose, S. B., & Singh, V. B. (1988c). State elections in India: Data handbook on Vidhan Sabha elections 1952-85: The South. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Bose, S. B., & Singh, V. B. (2000a). State elections in India: Data handbook on Vidhan Sabha Elections 1952-85: The North Part I. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Bose, S. B., & Singh, V. B. (2000b). State elections in India: Data handbook on Vidhan Sabha elections 1952-85: The West. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Bratton, K. A., & Ray, L. P. (2002). Descriptive Representation, policy outcomes, and municipal day-care coverage in Norway. American Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 428–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Census of India. 2011. www.censusindia.net
  24. Chattopadhyay, R., & Duflo, E. (2004). Women as policy makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India. Econometrica, 72(5), 1409–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chin, A., & Prakash, N. (2011). The redistributive effects of political reservation for minorities: Evidence from India. Journal of Development Economics, 96, 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Clots-Figueras, I. (2007). Are Female Leaders Good for Education? Evidence from India. Working Paper 07-73 Economics Series 42, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.Google Scholar
  27. Clots-Figueras, I. (2011). Women in Politics: Evidence from the Indian states. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 664–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Coffé, H., & Bolzendahl, C. (2010). Same game, different rules? Gender differences in political participation. Sex Roles, 62(5–6), 318–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Conley, T. (1996). Econometric Modeling of Cross-Sectional Dependence. Dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  30. Conley, T. (1999). GMM estimation with cross-sectional dependence. Journal of Econometrics, 92, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Constitution of India. (1949). Parts V and VI. http://india.gov.in/govt/constitutions_of_india.php
  32. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Crost, B., & Kambhampati, U. S. (2010). Political market characteristics and the provision of educational infrastructure in North India. World Development, 38(2), 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Delaney, L., & O’Toole, F. (2008). Individual, household and gender preferences for social transfers. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(3), 348–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Deshpande, A. (2007). Overlapping identities under liberalization: Gender and caste in India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 55(4), 735–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Diamond, I. (1977). Sex roles in the State House. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Drèze, J., & Sen, A. (1995). India economic development and social opportunity. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Drèze, J., & Sen, A. (2002). India: Development and participation (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Duflo, E. (2003). Grandmothers and Granddaughters: Old age pension and intrahousehold allocation in South Africa. World Bank Economic Review, 17(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Dye, T. R. (1966). Politics, economics and the public: Policy outcomes in the American States. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  41. Dye, T. R. (1969). Income inequality and American state politics. The American Political Science Review, 63(1), 157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Dyson, T., & Moore, M. (1983). On Kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9(1), 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Echávarri, R. A., & Ezcurra, R. (2010). Education and gender bias in the sex ratio at birth: Evidence from India. Demography, 47(1), 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Edlund, L., Haider, L., & Pande, R. (2005). Unmarried parenthood and redistributive politics. Journal of European Economic Association, 3(1), 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Edlund, L., & Pande, R. (2001). Why Have women become left-wing? The political gender gap and the decline in marriage. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 917–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Franceschet, S., & Piscopo, J. M. (2008). Gender quotas and women’s substantive representation: Lessons from Argentina. Politics and Gender, 4, 393–425.Google Scholar
  47. Franke, R. W., & Chasin, B. H. (1994). Kerala: Radical reform as development in an Indian State. Oregon, USA: Food First Books.Google Scholar
  48. Frederick, A. H. (2010). Practicing electoral politics in the cracks: Intersectional consciousness in a Latina Candidate’s City Council Campaign. Gender and Society, 24, 475–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Fürer-Haimendorf, C. V. (1982). Tribes of India: The struggle for survival. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Galanter, M. (1984). Competing equalities. Law and the backward classes in India. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  51. Garcia, D. M., Desmarais, S., Branscombe, N. R., & Gee, S. S. (2005). Opposition to redistributive employment policies for women: The role of policy experience and group interest. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 583–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Gotell, L., & Brodie, J. (1996). Women and the parties in the 1990s: Less than ever an issue of numbers. In H. G. Thornburn (Ed.), Party politics in Canada (7th ed., pp. 54–71). Scarborough: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  53. Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hancock, A. M. (2007). When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(1), 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hannaway, J., & Woodroffe, N. (2003). Policy instruments in education. Review of Research in Education, 27, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hill Collins, P. (2000). It’s all in the family: Intersections of gender, race, and nation. In U. Narayan & S. Harding (Eds.), Decentering the Center: Philosophy for a multicultural, postcolonial, and feminist World (pp. 156–176). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Hughes, M. M., & Paxton, P. (2008). Continuous change, episodes, and critical periods: A framework for understanding women’s political representation over Time. Politics and Gender, 4, 233–264.Google Scholar
  58. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). (1995). National Family Health Survey (MCH and Family Planning), India 1992–93. Bombay: IIPS.Google Scholar
  59. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. (2000). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), 1998-99: India. Mumbai: IIPS.Google Scholar
  60. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. (2007). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) 2005-06: India. Mumbai: IIPS.Google Scholar
  61. India Development Gateway. (2009). Primary Education. Right to Education. http://www.indg.in/primary-education/policiesandschemes/right-to-education-bill
  62. Jadhav, M. H. (1986). Anti-caste movement in Maharashtra. Economic and Political Weekly, 21, 740–742.Google Scholar
  63. Jeffrey, R., & Basu, A. M. (1996). Girls’ schooling, women’s autonomy and fertility change in South Asia. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  64. Jenkins, L. D. (1999). Competing inequalities: The Struggle over reserved legislative seats for women in India. International Review of Social History, 44(Supplement), 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kenworthy, L., & Malami, M. (1999). Gender inequality in political representation: A worldwide comparative analysis. Social Forces, 78(1), 235–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kumar, H., & Somanathan, R. (2009). Mapping Indian Districts Across Census Year, 1971-2001. Working Paper No. 176. Centre for Development Economics Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics.Google Scholar
  67. Kunovich, S., & Paxton, P. (2005). Pathways to power: The role of political parties in women’s national Political representation. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 505–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Library of Congress, Federal Research Division. (2004) Country Profile: India. http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/profiles/India.pdf
  69. Loftin, C., & Ward, S. (1983). A spatial autocorrelation model of the effects of population density on fertility. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lott, J. R., & Kenny, L. W. (1999). Did women’s suffrage change the size and scope of government? Journal of Political Economy, 107, 77–95.Google Scholar
  71. Lundberg, S., Pollak, R. A., & Wales, T. J. (1997). Do husbands and wives pool their resources?: Evidence from the United Kingdom Child Benefit. Journal of Human Resources, 32(3), 463–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Malhotra, A., & Schuler, S. R. (2005). Women’s empowerment as a variable in international development. In D. Narayan (Ed.), Measuring empowerment: Cross-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 71–88). Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  73. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. McLendon, M. K., Heller, D. E., & Young, S. P. (2005). State postsecondary policy innovation: Politics, competition, and the interstate migration of policy ideas. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(4), 363–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Meenakshisundaram, S. S. (2005). Rural development for Panchayati Raj. In L. C. Jain (Ed.), Decentralisation and local governance (pp. 417–433). New Delhi: Longman.Google Scholar
  76. Mehrotra, S. K. (2006). Reforming elementary education in India: A menu of options. International Journal of Educational Development, 26(3), 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Meyer, J. W., Tyack, D., Nagel, J., & Gordon, A. (1979). Public Education as Nation-building in America: Enrollments and bureaucratization in the American States, 1870–1930. The American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 591–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Miller, B. D. (1989). Changing patterns of juvenile sex rations in rural India, 1961 to 1971. Economic and Political Weekly, 24(22), 1229–1236.Google Scholar
  79. Miller, G. (2008). Women’s suffrage, political responsiveness, and child survival in American history. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(3), 1287–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Mishra, R. C. (2000). Role of women in legislatures in India: A Study. New Delhi: Anmol Publications.Google Scholar
  81. Moghadam, V. M. (1991). The reproduction of gender inequality In Muslim societies—A case-study Of Iran in the 1980s. World Development, 19(10), 1335–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Mohanty, B. (1995). Panchayati Raj, 73rd Constitutional Amendment and Women. Economic and Political Weekly, 30(52), 3346–3350.Google Scholar
  83. Munshi, K., & Rosenzweig, M. (2008). The efficacy of parochial politics: caste, commitment, and competence in Indian local governments. Working Paper No. 14335. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  84. Murthi, M., Guio, A. C., & Drèze, J. (1995). Mortality, Fertility, and Gender Bias in India: A District-Level Analysis. Population and Development Review, 21(4), 745–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. National Portal Content Management Team. (2009). Education Guarantee Scheme and Alternative and Innovative Education. http://india.gov.in/sectors/education/education_guarantee.php
  86. Omvedt, G. (1993). Dalits and the democratic revolution: Dr Ambedkar and the dalit movement in Colonial India. New Delhi: Sage Publishers.Google Scholar
  87. Pal, S., & Ghosh, S. (2008). The Elite and the Marginalised: An Analysis of Public Spending on Mass Education in the Indian States, IZA Discussion Paper No. 3707, Bonn, Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar
  88. Pande, R. (2003). Can mandated political representation increase policy influence for disadvantaged minorities? American Economic Review, 93(4), 1132–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Paxton, P., Hughes, M. M., & Green, J. L. (2006). The international women’s movement and women’s political representation, 1893–2003. American Sociological Review, 71(6), 898–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Paxton, P., & Kunovich, S. (2003). Women’s political representation: The importance of ideology. Social Forces, 82(1), 87–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Paxton, P., Kunovich, S., & Hughes, M. M. (2007). Gender in Politics. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Phillips, A. (1998). The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Pundir, J. K., & Singh, P. (2002). Women legislators in UP: Background, emergence and role. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(1), 923–928.Google Scholar
  94. Randall, V. (2006). Legislative gender quotas and Indian exceptionalism: The travails of the women’s reservation bill. Comparative Politics, 39(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ratnam, K. Y. (2008). The Dalit Movement and Democratization in Andhra Pradesh. Working Paper 13. East-West Center Washington.Google Scholar
  96. Renzulli, L. A., & Roscigno, V. J. (2005). Charter school policy, implementation, and diffusion across the United States. Sociology of Education, 78, 344–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Richter, L. K. (1990). Exploring theories of female leadership in South and Southeast Asia. Pacific Affairs, 63(4), 524–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Roy, A., Kamaiah, B., & Rao, M. G. (2000). Educational expenditure of large states—A normative view. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(17), 1465–1469.Google Scholar
  99. Rubalcava, L., Teruel, G., & Thomas, D. (2009). Investments, time preferences, and public transfers paid to women. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 57(3), 507–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Saidel, J. R., & Loscocco, K. (2005). Agency leaders, gendered institutions, and representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 158–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Sanyal, K. (2008). Legislative brief: The Constitution (One Hundred and Eighth Amendment) Bill, 2008. PRS Legislative Brief.Google Scholar
  102. Schwindt-Bayer, L. A. (2006). Still Supermadres? Gender and the policy priorities of Latin American Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 570–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Schwindt-Bayer, L. A. (2011). Women who win: Social backgrounds, paths to power, and political ambition in Latin American legislatures. Politics & Gender, 7(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Sen, A. (2005). The argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian history, culture and identity. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  105. Srinivas, M. N. (1957). Caste in Modern India. The Journal of Asian Studies, 16(4), 529–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Stevenson, L. S. (1999). Gender politics in the Mexican Democratization process: Electing women and legislating sex crimes and affirmative Action, 1988–97. In J. Domínguez & A. Poiré (Eds.), Towards Mexico’s democratization: Parties, campaigns, elections and public opinion (pp. 57–87). New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  107. Stryker, S. 1980. Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings.Google Scholar
  108. Svaleryd, H. (2009). Women’s representation and public spending. European Journal of Political Economy, 25(2), 186–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Thapar, S. (1993). Women as activists; women as symbols: A Study of the Indian Nationalist Movement. Feminist Review, 44, 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. The Hindu. (2014). Women’s bill: An idea whose time is yet to come in LS. http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/womens-bill-an-idea-whose-time-is-yet-to-come-in-ls/article5713978.ece. Retrieved on November 01, 2014.
  111. Thomas, D. (1990). Intra-household resource allocation: an inferential approach. Journal of Human Resources, 25(4), 635–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Thomas, S. (1991). The impact of women on state legislative policies. Journal of Politics, 53, 958–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Thomas, S. (1994). How women legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  114. Thomas, D. (1997). Incomes, expenditures and health outcomes: Evidence on intrahousehold resource allocation. In L. Haddad, J. Hoddinott, & H. Alderman (Eds.), Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries: Models, methods, and policy (pp. 142–164). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  115. Thomas, S., & Welch, S. (1991). The Impact of gender on activities and priorities of State Legislators. The Western Political Quarterly, 44(2), 445–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. United Nations Children’s Fund [UNICEF]. (2011). Using the district information system for education to promote equity in education. Briefing Paper Series: Innovations, lessons, and good practices. New Delhi: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  117. Wängnerud, L. (2002). Testing the politics of presence: Women’s representation in the Swedish Riksdag. Scandanavian Political Studies, 23(1), 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Wu, K. B., Goldschmidt, P., Boscardin, C. K., & Azam, M. (2007). Girls in India: Poverty, location, and social disparities. In M. Lewis & M. Lockheed (Eds.), Exclusion, gender and education: Case studies from the Developing World (pp. 119–143). Washington, D.C.: Center for Global Development.Google Scholar
  119. Zhou, X. G., Moen, P., & Tuma, N. B. (1998). Educational stratification in urban China: 1949-94. Sociology of Education, 71(3), 199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nafisa Halim
    • 1
  • Kathryn M. Yount
    • 2
    • 3
  • Solveig A. Cunningham
    • 2
    • 3
  • Rohini P. Pande
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Global Health and Development, Department of Global Health, School of Public HealthBoston UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public HealthEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  4. 4.Takoma ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations