Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 124, Issue 3, pp 835–862 | Cite as

The Personal Wellbeing Index in the South African IsiXhosa Translation: A Qualitative Focus Group Study

  • Valerie MøllerEmail author
  • Benjamin Roberts
  • Dalindyebo Zani
Article

Abstract

International scholars who rely on the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI) to compare cross-cultural quality of life have often been confronted with the problems of nuances getting ‘lost in translation’. This qualitative study explored the meaning of the isiXhosa version of the PWI in focus group discussions with native speakers. Participants in the study discussed how they understood and rated their lives on each item in the index. The discourse conveyed the different shades of meaning associated with the PWI items of life satisfaction and eight domains of life. The study found that PWI items related to material well-being, living standards, achievements in life and future (financial) security were best understood. The PWI items referring to personal relationships and community connectedness were seen as nearly identical in meaning. Both translation and cultural factors may be responsible for the conflation of these two items. Noteworthy is that the PWI item on religion and spirituality was seen to embrace both Christian and traditional African beliefs and practice, without prejudice. A new item on daily activities was piloted with good results. The focus group study also showcased the manner in which discussants worked with the rating scale and drew on social comparisons when evaluating global and domain satisfactions. It is concluded that cognitive testing of PWI items in different translations will serve not only to appraise the validity of PWI ratings across cultures, but importantly also opens a window on what makes for a life of quality in a particular social setting.

Keywords

Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI) Focus group discussions of meanings Cross-cultural quality of life Cognitive testing Second-level deconstruction of life satisfaction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was conducted with generous incentive funding from the South African National Research Foundation (NRF), Grant 85343, as part of the cooperative research programme on Quality of Life in South African and Algeria: A Multi-Method Approach (NRF Grant UID 77926). Views expressed are those of the researchers and should not be attributed to the NRF or others.

References

  1. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Camfield, L. (2010). ‘‘Even if she learns, she doesn’t understand properly’’: Children’s understandings of illbeing and poverty in five Ethiopian communities. Social Indicators Research, 96, 85–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Camfield, L., & Ruta, D. (2007). ‘Translation is not enough’: Using the Global Person Generated Index (GPGI) to assess individual quality of life in Bangladesh, Thailand, and Ethiopia. Quality of Life Research, 16, 1039–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cummins, R. A. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52, 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cummins, R. A. (2005). Moving from the quality of life concept to a theory. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49(10), 699–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davern, M. T., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. A. (2007). Subjective wellbeing as an affective-cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 429–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delhey, J., Böhnke, P., Habich, R., & Zapf, W. (2002). Quality of life in a European perspective: The Euromodule as a new instrument for comparative welfare research. Social Indicators Research, 58, 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., Oishi, S., & Suh, E. M. (2002). Looking up and looking down: Weighting good and bad information in life satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(4), 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eckermann, E., Scopaz, A., & Clarke, M. (2014). Quality of life for pregnant and recent parity women in Lao PDR. In E. Eckermann (Ed.), Gender, lifespan and quality of life: An international perspective (pp. 115–133)., Social indicators research series 53 Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emmons, R. (1986). Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1058–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Headey, B., Veenhoven, R., & Wearing, A. (1991). Top-down versus bottom-up theories of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 24, 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. International Wellbeing Group. (2013). Personal Wellbeing Index (5th ed.). Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life. Deakin University (http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing-index/index.php).
  14. International Wellbeing Group. (2014). http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/iwbg/index.php.
  15. Lau, A. L. D., Cummins, R. A., & McPherson, W. (2005). An investigation into the cross-cultural equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 72, 403–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Makinana, A. (2013). Thirty circumcision deaths so far in Eastern Cape. Mail & Guardian, 24 December. http://mg.co.za/article/2013-12-24-30-circumcision-deaths-so-far-in-eastern-cape. Accessed 27 May, 2014.
  17. Mazaheri, M. (2006). Effects of response formats on ratings of satisfaction and dissatisfaction with life. Doctoral dissertation in psychological sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.Google Scholar
  18. Mazaheri, M., & Theuns, P. (2006). A comparison of different formats of the Anamnestic Comparative Self Assessment (ACSA) for the assessment of subjective well-being. Pro Newsletter, 36, 10–13.Google Scholar
  19. Michalos, A. C. (1986). Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16, 347–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Møller, V. (1998). Quality of life in South Africa: Post-apartheid trends. Social Indicators Research, 43, 27–68.Google Scholar
  21. Møller, V., & Radloff, S. (2010). Monitoring perceptions of social progress and pride of place in a South African community. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 5(1), 49–71.Google Scholar
  22. Noble, M., & Wright, G. (2013). Ring of fire: Socially perceived necessities in informal urban settlements in South Africa. Policy & Politics, 41(2), 259–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Renn, D., Pfaffenberger, N., Platter, M., Mitmansgruber, H., Cummins, R. A., & Höfer, S. (2009). International Well-being Index: The Austrian version. Social Indicators Research, 90, 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roberts, B., Struwig, J., Gordon, S., Ngungu, M., & Jordaan, A. (2013). Quality of Life in South Africa and Algeria: SASAS 2012 tabulation report. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar
  25. South African Social Attitudes Survey (SASAS). (2012). http://www.hsrc.ac.za/en/departments/sasas.
  26. Tiliouine, H., Cummins, R. A., & Davern, M. (2009). Islamic religiosity, subjective well-being, and health. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 12(1), 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Webb, D. (2009). Subjective wellbeing on the Tibetan plateau: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 753–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wills, E. (2009). Spirituality and subjective well-being: Evidences for a new domain in the personal Well-Being Index. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yiengprugsawan, V., Seubsman, S., Khamman, S., Lim, L. L.-Y., Sleigh, A. C., & the Thai Cohort Study Team. (2010). Personal Wellbeing Index in a National Cohort of 87,134 Thai Adults. Social Indicators Research, 98, 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valerie Møller
    • 1
    Email author
  • Benjamin Roberts
    • 2
  • Dalindyebo Zani
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Social and Economic ResearchRhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa
  2. 2.Democracy, Governance and Service Delivery ProgrammeHuman Sciences Research CouncilPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations