Social Indicators Research

, Volume 124, Issue 2, pp 383–400 | Cite as

Including the Views of the Public in a Survey of Poverty and Social Exclusion in Hong Kong: Findings from Focus Group Research

  • Maggie Lau
  • David Gordon
  • Christina Pantazis
  • Eileen Sutton
  • Lea Lai
Article

Abstract

There has been growing research interest into poverty and social exclusion in Hong Kong over the past 30 years. However, the development of surveys in this field continues to be primarily ‘top-down’ or ‘expert-led’. ‘Bottom-up’ or ‘lay’ perspectives, utilising the views of ordinary members of the public, are rarely incorporated. This article discusses the use of consensual focus group methods to advance the theory and practice of poverty and social exclusion measurement in Hong Kong. By adapting the UK Poverty and Social Exclusion Study 2012 to the Hong Kong context, the article reports on public perceptions of the necessities of life and understanding of social exclusion. The study found a strong social consensus about what items and activities constitute an acceptable standard of living in Hong Kong. Furthermore, whilst social exclusion was an unfamiliar concept, participants were able identify and explain experiences such as discrimination (affecting new arrivals), geographical isolation, a culture of long-working hours and poor access to health services as key elements.

Keywords

Poverty Social exclusion Focus groups Consensual methods 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)/Research Grants Council (RGC) Joint Research Scheme (RES-000-22-4400) and ESRC Grant (RES-060-25-0052).

References

  1. Barnes, H. & Wright, G. (2012). Defining child poverty in South Africa using the socially perceived necessities approach. In: A. Minujin and S. Nandy (Eds.), Global child poverty and well-Being: Measurement, concepts, policy and action, studies in poverty. Inequality and Social Exclusion Series, Bristol: Policy Press (pp. 135–154).Google Scholar
  2. Barter, C & Renold, E. (1999). The use of vignettes in qualitative research. Social Research Update, Issue 25. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU25.html.
  3. Bradshaw, J. (1972). The taxonomy of social need. In G. McLachlan (Ed.), Problems and progress in medical care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bradshaw, J. (1993). Budget standards for the United Kingdom. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  5. Chan, K. B. (Ed.). (2011). Poverty and change. Hong Kong: Chung Hwa Book Company. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  6. Chow, N. W. S. (1982). Poverty in an affluent city: A report of a survey on low income families in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Department of Social Work, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  7. Chua, H. W., Chan, M., Lau, M., Choi, W. H., Kam, I., & Cheung, J. (2002). Social development index 2002 and review of social development 1997–2002 (In Chinese). Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Council of Social Service.Google Scholar
  8. Chua, H. W., Wong, A., Leung, K., Hsu, T., & Yang, A. (2012). Social development index 2012 (In Chinese). Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Council of Social Service.Google Scholar
  9. Chui, E. (2008). Ageing in place in Hong Kong—challenges and opportunities in a capitalist Chinese city. Ageing International, 32(3), 167–182.Google Scholar
  10. CONEVAL. (2010). Methodology for multidimensional poverty measurement in Mexico. Mexico City: CONEVAL.Google Scholar
  11. EEC. (1981). Final report from the commission to the council on the first programme of pilot schemes and studies to combat poverty. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  12. EEC. (1985). On specific community action to combat poverty (Council decision of 19 December 1984) 85/8/EEC. Official Journal of the EEC, 2/24.Google Scholar
  13. Estes, R. (2000). Social development in Hong Kong: The unfinished agenda. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Council of Social Service.Google Scholar
  14. Fahmy, E., Pemberton, S. & Sutton, E. (2012). Public perceptions of poverty and social exclusion: Final report on focus group findings. Poverty and Social Exclusion in the UK, Working Paper Analysis Series No. 3. University of Bristol: Townsend Centre for International Poverty Research.Google Scholar
  15. Gordon, D. (2011). Europe 2020 poverty measures. PSEUK Working Paper Methods Series No. 10.Google Scholar
  16. Gordon, D., Adelman, L., Ashworth, K., Bradshaw, J., Levitas, R., Middleton, S., et al. (2000). Poverty and social exclusion in Britain. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Gordon, D., Mack, J., Lansley, S., Main, G., Nandy, S., Patsios, D., et al. (2013). The impoverishment of the UK: PSE UK first results: Living standards. Bristol: University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  18. Gordon, D., & Pantazis, C. (1997). The public perception of necessities and poverty. In D. Gordon & C. Pantazis (Eds.), Breadline Britain in the 1990s. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  19. Guio, A. C., Gordon, D., & Marlier, E. (2012). Measuring material deprivation in the EU indicators for the whole population and child-specific indicators. Luxembourg: Eurostat.Google Scholar
  20. Hesse-Biber S. N. & Leavy, P. (2011). Focus group interviews. The practice of qualitative research. (2nd ed.) Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Hirsch, D. & Smith N. (2010). Family values—parents’ views on necessities for families with children. Research Report No. 641. London: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
  22. Hong Kong Council of Social Service. (2012). Report of research study on deprivation and social exclusion in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: HKCSS.Google Scholar
  23. Hong Kong Council of Social Service. (2013). Poverty analysis (2012 1st half) (In Chinese). Hong Kong: HKCSS.Google Scholar
  24. Hong Kong Social Welfare Department. (1996). Report on review of comprehensive social security scheme (CSSA). Hong Kong: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  25. INVOLVE. (2010). Payment for involvement: A guide for making payments to members of the public actively involved in NHS. INVOLVE, Eastleigh: Public Health and Social Care Research.Google Scholar
  26. Lau, K. W. M. (2005). Poverty and social exclusion in Hong Kong. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of York, York, UK.Google Scholar
  27. Lau, M., Pantazis, C., Gordon, D. & Sutten, E. (forthcoming). Poverty in Hong Kong. The China Review.Google Scholar
  28. Levitas, R. (1996). The concept of social exclusion and the new Durkheimian hegemony. Critical Social Policy, 16(1), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levitas, R. (2006). The concept and measurement of social exclusion. In C. Pantazis, D. Gordon, & R. Levitas (Eds.), Poverty and social exclusion in Britain: The millennium survey. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  30. Levitas, R., Pantazis, C., Fahmy, E., Gordon, D., Lloyd, E., & Patsios, D. (2007). The multi-dimensional analysis of social exclusion. Department of Sociology and School for Social Policy, Townsend Centre for the International Study of Poverty and Bristol Institute for Public Affairs, University of Bristol. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/poverty/socialexclusion.html
  31. Liou, H.C. & Gordon, D. (2009). The development of the indicators of poverty and social exclusion in Taiwan. Paper presented at the Joint Annual East Asian Social Policy International Conference and the East Asian Social Policy Research Network (EASP) on ‘Global economic crisis and welfare restructuring in East Asia’ held between 3 and 4 July 2009 in the University of Sheffield, UK.Google Scholar
  32. Liu, E., Yue, S. Y., & Lee, V. (1996). Research on the determinants for the social assistance scale in Hong Kong and selected countries. Hong Kong: Research and Library Services Division, Legislative Council Secretariat.Google Scholar
  33. Lui, T. L., & Wong, H. (1995). Disempowerment and empowerment—An exploratory study on low-income households in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Oxfam Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  34. Mack, J., & Lansley, S. (1985). Poor Britain. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  35. MacPherson, S. (1994). Report on the adequacy of public assistance rates in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Department of Public & Social Administration, City Polytechnic of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  36. MacPherson, S., & Lo, O. Y. (1997). A measure of poverty. Hong Kong: Department of Public & Social Administration, City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  37. Maitre, B., Nolan, B. & Whelan, C. T. (2006). Reconfiguring the measurement of deprivation and consistent poverty in Ireland. Dublin: ESRI Policy Research Series 58.Google Scholar
  38. Middleton, S. (1988). Revising the breadline Britain questions: Relevant findings from the group (Chapter 8). In J. Bradshaw, et al. (Eds.), Perceptions of poverty & social exclusion, 1998: report on preparatory research. Bristol: Townsend Centre for International Poverty Research.Google Scholar
  39. Mok, H. T. K. (1999). A study on policies for poverty elimination in Hong Kong (In Chinese). Hong Kong: Joint Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Pantazis, C., Gordon, D., & Townsend, P. (2006). The necessities of life. In C. Pantazis, D. Gordon, & R. Levitas (Eds.), Poverty and social exclusion in Britain: The millennium survey. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  41. Piachaud, D. (1987). Problem in the definition and measurement of poverty. Journal of Social Policy, 16(2), 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ralph, K., Palmer, K. & Olney, J. (2012). Subjective well-being: A qualitative investigation of subjective well-being questions. A Working Paper for the Technical Advisory Group. London: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
  43. Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Elam, G. (2003). Designing and selecting samples. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social scientists and researchers (pp. 77–108). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Saunders, P., Naidoo, Y., & Griffiths, M. (2007). Towards new indicators of disadvantage: Deprivation and social exclusion in Australia. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre.Google Scholar
  46. Shi, W. H., & Ng, C. H. (1997). The different faces of poverty in Hong Kong (In Chinese). Hong Kong: Caritas Hong Kong, Youth and Community Service.Google Scholar
  47. Silver, H. (1995). Social exclusion and social solidarity: Three paradigms. International Labour Review, 133(5/6), 531–578.Google Scholar
  48. Simmons, E., & Wilmot, A. (2004). Incentive payments in social surveys: A literature review. Survey Methodology Bulletin, 53, 1–12.Google Scholar
  49. Singleton, R. A., & Straits, B. C. (Eds.). (2010). Approach to social research (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Society for Community Organizations & Concern Group on Children’s Rights. (2011). A study of poor children’s quality of life. Hong Kong: The Society for Community Organizations.Google Scholar
  51. Srivastava, A., & Thomson, S. B. (2009). Framework analysis: A qualitative methodology for applied policy research. Research Note. JOAAG, 4(2), 72–79.Google Scholar
  52. Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the UK: A survey of household resources and standards of living. England: Pengium.Google Scholar
  53. Wong, H. (2005). Report on basic needs study in Hong Kong (In Chinese). Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Council of Social Service.Google Scholar
  54. Wong, H. (2011). Quality of life of poor people living in remote areas in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 100, 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wong, H. & Chua, H.W. (1996). Research on household expenditure patterns of low income households in Hong Kong (In Chinese). Research on Poverty in Hong Kong Series No. 1. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Council of Social Service & Oxfam Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  56. Wong, H., & Lee, K. M. (2000). The recent trends of marginal workers in Hong Kong (In Chinese). Hong Kong: Oxfam Hong Kong.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maggie Lau
    • 1
  • David Gordon
    • 2
  • Christina Pantazis
    • 2
  • Eileen Sutton
    • 3
  • Lea Lai
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Public PolicyCity University of Hong KongKowloon TongHong Kong
  2. 2.School for Policy StudiesUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  3. 3.NIHR Biomedical Research Unit in Nutrition, Diet & Lifestyle Level 3University Hospitals Bristol Education CentreBristolUK

Personalised recommendations