Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 124, Issue 1, pp 183–198 | Cite as

The Simple Structure of Positive Affect

  • Ylenio LongoEmail author
Article

Abstract

The structure of affect is often studied through the circumplex: a circular model on which similar (i.e. highly correlated) states lie close to each other. While very informative, the circumplex lacks simple structure, as items spread more or less uniformly around its perimeter. Consequently, affect scales loading close to each other on the circumplex are likely to overlap substantially and have poor discriminant validity. The present study aims to identify distinct dimensions of affect. Based on theory and previous findings, the following hypotheses were formulated: (1) only positive affect items loading on the most distant segments of the circumplex will form two separate factors and approximate a simple structure; (2) moderate-arousal positive affect (MAP) should be representative of general positive affect; (3) MAP should substantially overlap with life satisfaction (LS). The hypotheses were tested in an Australian sample (N = 424) through exploratory analyses and structural equation modelling, and were all supported. The paper contributes to current research by encouraging a more parsimonious measurement of positive affect. Studies focusing on different levels of arousal may only use scales of calmness and energy. Studies that aim to measure positive affect in general may simply use a MAP scale, as a promising alternative to the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS, Watson et al. in J Pers Soc Psychol 54(6):1063–1070, 1988). Finally, since MAP also explained 68 % of the variance in LS, it shows potential as a brief measure of subjective well-being.

Keywords

Positive affect Life satisfaction Subjective well-being Circumplex Vitality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council grant ES/J500100/1 to Ylenio Longo. Portions of this article served as part of Ylenio Longo’s PhD thesis. Thanks are due to Robert A. Cummins for providing the data, and to Stephen Joseph, Nick Manning, and Cees van der Eijk for comments on prior versions of this paper.

References

  1. Alfonso, V. C., Allison, D. B., Rader, D. E., & Gorman, B. S. (1996). The extended satisfaction with life scale: Development and psychometric properties. Social Indicators Research, 38(3), 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bao, K. J., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2013). The rewards of happiness. In S. A. David, I. Boniwell, & A. C. Ayers (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 119–133). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  4. Conway, A. M., Tugade, M. M., Catalino, L. I., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions: Form, function, and mechanisms. In S. A. David, I. Boniwell, & A. C. Ayers (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 17–34). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davern, M. T., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. A. (2007). Subjective wellbeing as an affective-cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(4), 429–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E., & Chan, M. Y. (2011). Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3(1), 1–43.Google Scholar
  10. Ekkekakis, P. (2013). The measurement of affect, mood, and emotion: A guide for health-behavioral research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Feldman Barrett, L., & Russell, J. A. (1998). Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 967–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fredrickson, B. L., & Cohn, M. A. (2008). Positive emotions. In M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones, & L. Feldman Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions, (pp. 777–796). New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
  18. Hone, L., Jarden, A., & Schofield, G. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Flourishing Scale in a New Zealand sample. Social Indicators Research. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11205-013-0501-x.
  19. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford press.Google Scholar
  20. Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1992). Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Emotion (pp. 25–59). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Lavallee, L. F., Hatch, P. M., Michalos, A. C., & McKinley, T. (2007). Development of the contentment with life assessment scale (CLAS): Using daily life experiences to verify levels of self-reported life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 83(2), 201–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. O’ Boyle, E.H., & Williams, L.J. (2010). RMSEA-P and 90% confidence interval calculator. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/235340737_O’Boyle__Williams_RMSEA-P_CI_calculator/file/9fcfd51111a663c088.xls.
  24. Pressman, S. D., & Cohen, S. (2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 925–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Remington, N. A., Fabrigar, L. R., & Visser, P. S. (2000). Reexamining the circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2), 286–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Russell, J. A., & Feldman Barrett, L. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 805–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Russell, J. A., Lewicka, M., & Niit, T. (1989). A cross-cultural study of a circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 848–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2000). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implication. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  31. Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sortheix, F. M., & Lönnqvist, J. E. (2014). Personal value priorities and life satisfaction in Europe: The moderating role of socioeconomic development. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(2), 282–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
  35. Thayer, R. E. (1967). Measurement of activation through self-report. Psychological Reports, 20(2), 663–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thayer, R. E. (2012). Moods of energy and tension that motivate. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 408–419). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Watkins, M.W. (2000) Monte Carlo PCA for Parallel Analysis (Mac version). Real basic.Google Scholar
  38. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yik, M., Russell, J. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2011). A 12-point circumplex structure of core affect. Emotion, 11(4), 705–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of MedicineUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations