Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 124, Issue 1, pp 249–258 | Cite as

An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Subjective Happiness Scale

  • Brian P. O’ConnorEmail author
  • Maxine R. Crawford
  • Mark D. Holder
Article

Abstract

Item response theory analyses were conducted on Lyubomirsky and Lepper’s (Soc Indic Res 46:137–155, 1999) Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS) in a sample of 1,037 undergraduates. In general, the SHS performed well. However, four, clear, previously unreported findings emerged that suggest modifications for improving the scale. The measure displayed weak discrimination power at the high, happy end of the latent trait continuum. The number of response options (seven) is excessive and unnecessary. One of the SHS items is problematic and provides minimal psychometric information relative to the other three items, apparently because of ambiguity in the wording of the item. And a three-item version of the SHS performed just as well as the original, four-item version. The implications of these findings for the usage and further development of the SHS are discussed.

Keywords

Happiness Wellbeing Psychometrics Item response theory 

References

  1. Brunel, F. F., Tietje, B. C., & Greenwald, A. G. (2004). Is the implicit association test a valid and valuable measure of implicit consumer social cognition? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 385–404. doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. de Ayala, R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York, NY: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  3. DeMars, C. (2010). Item response theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective wellbeing. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective wellbeing. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Edelen, M. O., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16, 5–18. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9198-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Howell, R. T., Rodzon, K. S., Kurai, M., & Sanchez, A. H. (2010). A validation of wellbeing and internet surveys for administration via the internet. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 775–784. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lyubomirksy, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137–155. doi: 10.1023/A:1006824100041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005a). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005b). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111–131. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Morizot, J., Ainsworth, A. T., & Reise, S. P. (2007). Toward modern psychometrics: Application of item response theory models in personality research. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 407–423). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  12. Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00298.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ramsay, J. O. (1993). TESTGRAF: A program for the graphical analysis of multiple choice test and questionnaire data. Unpublished manuscript, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. (http://www.psych.mcgill.ca/faculty/ramsay/TestGraf.html).
  14. Reise, S. P., Ainsworth, A. T., & Haviland, M. G. (2005). Item response theory. Current directions in psychological science, 14(2), 95–101. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00342.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rizopoulos, D. (2006). Ltm: An R package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses. Journal of Statistical Software, 17 1–25.Google Scholar
  16. Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, 34(4), 100.Google Scholar
  17. Santor, D. A., & Ramsay, J. O. (1998). Progress in the technology of measurement: applications of item response models. Psychological Assessment, 10, 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian P. O’Connor
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maxine R. Crawford
    • 1
  • Mark D. Holder
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of British Columbia - OkanaganKelownaCanada

Personalised recommendations