Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 124, Issue 1, pp 295–316 | Cite as

The Effect of Parental Separation on Young Adults’ Political and Civic Participation

  • Marieke Voorpostel
  • Hilde Coffé
Article

Abstract

Whereas an extensive literature exists on the effect of parental separation on young adults’ health, well-being and educational attainment, relatively little is known about its effect on young adults’ political and civic engagement. The current paper aims to remedy this deficiency and explore to what extent parental separation affects young adults’ likelihood to vote and volunteer. Taking insights from the social learning and parental status theories, we argue that because of separated parents’ overall lower levels of political and civic engagement as well as socioeconomic status compared with parents who are living together, young adults with separated parents will be less likely to engage in political and civic life compared with those whose parents are living together. Using data from the Swiss Household Panel Survey (1999–2009), our analyses reveal in line with our expectations that parental separation has a negative effect on young adults’ voting and volunteering patterns. Supporting the social learning theory, this negative effect of parental divorce or separation can be partly explained by the lower levels of political and civic engagement among separated parents compared with parents who are living together.

Keywords

Separation Divorce Young adults Voting frequency Volunteering 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Laura Stoker for her valuable suggestions and the fruitful discussions. They would also like to thank Harry Chapman for his editorial help. This study uses data from the Swiss Household Panel (SHP), which is based at the Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences FORS. The SHP is financed by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF).

References

  1. Aassve, A., Betti, G., Mazzuco, S., & Mencarini, L. (2007). Marital disruption and economic well-being: A comparative analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 170(3), 781–799. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00483.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amato, P. R. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1269–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 650–666. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00723.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amato, P. R., & James, S. (2010). Divorce in Europe and the United States: Commonalities and differences across nations. Family Science, 1(1), 2–13. doi: 10.1080/19424620903381583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amato, P. R., & Keith, B. (1991). Parental divorce and adult well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andolina, M. W., Jenkins, K., Zukin, C., & Keeter, S. (2003). Habits from home, lessons from school: Influences on youth civic engagement. PS: Political Science and Politics, 36(2), 275–280.Google Scholar
  7. Astone, N. M., & McLanahan, S. S. (1991). Family structure, parental practices and high school completion. American Sociological Review, 56(3), 309–320. doi: 10.2307/2096106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beck, P. A., & Jennings, M. K. (1982). Pathways to participation. The American Political Science Review, 76(1), 94–108. doi: 10.2307/1960445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bekkers, R. (2007). Intergenerational transmission of volunteering. Acta Sociologica, 50(2), 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bengtson, V. L., Biblarz, T. J., & Roberts, R. E. (2002). How families still matter: A longitudinal study of youth in two generations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. BFS. (2008a). Familien in der Schweiz: Statistischer Bericht 2008. Neuchâtel: BFS.Google Scholar
  12. BFS. (2008b). Freiwilligenarbeit in der Schweiz. Neuchâtel: BFS.Google Scholar
  13. BFS. (2011). Freiwilligenarbeit in der Schweiz 2010. Neuchâtel: BFS.Google Scholar
  14. Bianchi, S. M., & Robinson, J. (1997). What did you do today? Children’s use of time, family composition, and the acquisition of social capital. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59(2), 332–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blais, A., Gidengil, E., Nevitte, N., & Nadeau, R. (2004). Where does turnout decline come from? European Journal of Political Research, 43, 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond Ses: A resource model of political participation. The American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294. doi: 10.2307/2082425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coffé, H., & Voorpostel, M. (2010). Young people, parents and radical right voting: The case of the Swiss people’s party. Electoral Studies, 29, 435–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen, C., & Dawson, M. (1993). Neighborhood poverty and African-American politics. American Political Science Review, 95, 589–602.Google Scholar
  19. Dalton, R. J. (1980). Reassessing parental socialization: Indicator unreliability versus generational transfer. American Political Science Review, 74, 421–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dolan, K. (1995). Attitudes, behaviors, and the influence of the family: A reexamination of the role of family structure. Political Behavior, 17(3), 251–264. doi: 10.2307/586521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1992). The constant flux: A study of class mobility in industrial societies. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  22. Eurostat. (2011). Marriage and divorce statistics. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Marriage_and_divorce_statistics. Accessed 1 May 2012.
  23. Flanagan, C. A., Bowes, J. M., Jonsson, B., Csapo, B., & Sheblanova, E. (1998). Ties that bind: Correlates of adolescent’s civic commitments in seven countries. Journal of Social Issues, 54(3), 457–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Flanagan, C. A., & Sherrod, L. R. (1998). Youth political development: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 54(3), 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gahler, M., & Garriga, A. (2012). Has the association between parental divorce and young adults’ psychological problems changed over time? Evidence from Sweden, 1968–2000. Journal of Family Issues,. doi: 10.1177/0192513x12447177.Google Scholar
  26. Havermans, N., Botterman, S., & Matthijs, K. (2014). Family resources as mediators in the relation between divorce and children’s school engagement. The Social Science Journal, Advance Online Publication. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2014.04.001.
  27. Helmig, B., Gmür, M., Bärlocher, C., Von Schnurbein, G., Degen, B., Nollert, M., et al. (2011). The Swiss civil society sector in a comparative perspective. VMI Research Series. Volume 6. Fribourg: Institute for Research on Management of Associations, Foundations and Cooperatives (VMI).Google Scholar
  28. Hener, T., Rainer, H., & Siedler, T. (2012). Political socialization in flux? Linking family non-intactness during childhood to adult civic engagement. CESifo Working Paper No. 3918. Munich: CESifo.Google Scholar
  29. Humphries, M., Muller, C., & Schiller, K. S. (2013). The political socialization of adolescent children of immigrants. Social Science Quarterly, 94(5), 1261–1282. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.12025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jalovaara, M. (2003). The joint effects of marriage partner’s socioeconomic positions on the risk of divorce. Demography, 40(1), 67–81. doi: 10.1353/dem.2003.0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jennings, M. K., & Niemi, R. G. (1968). The transmission of political values from parent to child. American Political Science Review, 62, 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jennings, M. K., Stoker, L., & Bowers, J. (2009). Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 782–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kalil, A., Ryan, R., & Chor, E. (2014). Time investments in children across family structures. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 654(1), 150–168. doi: 10.1177/0002716214528276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kalmijn, M. (2010). Country differences in the effects of divorce on well-being: The role of norms, support, and selectivity. European Sociological Review, 26(4), 475–490. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcp035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kroh, M. (2011). Fällt der Apfel immer weiter vom Stamm? Veränderungen der intergenerationalen Stabilität von Parteibindungen. PVS Sonderheft 2011 “Wählen in Deutschland”.Google Scholar
  36. Langton, K. (1969). Political socialization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lepkowski, J. M., & Couper, M. P. (2002). Nonresponse in the second wave of longitudinal household surveys. In R. M. Groves, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge, & R. J. Little (Eds.), Survey nonresponse. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Lipps, O. (2007). Attrition in the Swiss household panel. Methoden–Daten–Analysen, 1(1), 45–68.Google Scholar
  39. Lutz, G. (2012). Elections fédérales 2011: Participation et choix électoral. Lausanne: FORS.Google Scholar
  40. McManus, P. A., & DiPrete, T. A. (2001). Losers and winners: The financial consequences of separation and divorce for men. American Sociological Review, 66(2), 246–268. doi: 10.2307/2657417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neundorf, A., Smets, K., & Garcia-Albacete, G. M. (2013). Homemade citizens: The development of political interest during adolescence and young adulthood. Acta Politica, 48(1), 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nieuwbeerta, P., & Wittebrood, K. (1995). Intergenerational transmission of political party preference in the Netherlands. Social Science Research, 24, 243–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. OECD. OECD better life index. http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org. Accessed 17 July 2014.
  44. Perry, L. S., & Associates. (2002). Short-term impacts, long-term opportunities: The political and civic engagement of young adults in America. http://www.civicyouth.org/research/products/National_Youth_Survey/summary.pdf.
  45. Peterson, R. R. (1996). A re-evaluation of the economic consequences of divorce. American Sociological Review, 61(3), 528–536. doi: 10.2307/2096363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Plutzer, E. (2002). Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Poortman, A.-R. (2000). Sex differences in the economic consequences of separation: A panel study of the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 16(4), 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Prokic, T., & Dronkers, J. (2009). Parental divorce and attitudes about society of their children. Paper presented at the seventh meeting of the European network for sociological and demographic study of divorce, Antwerp, Belgium, June 25–26.Google Scholar
  49. Purdam, K., & Tranmer, M. (2012). Helping values and civic engagement. European Societies, 14(3), 393–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Quintelier, E., & van Deth, J. W. (2014). Supporting democracy: Political participation and political attitudes. Exploring causality using panel data. Political Studies, 62, 153–171. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sandell, J., & Plutzer, E. (2005). Families, divorce and voter turnout in the US. Political Behavior, 27(2), 133–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Speare, A, Jr, & Goldscheider, F. K. (1987). Effects of marital status change on residential mobility. Journal of Marriage and Family, 49(2), 455–464. doi: 10.2307/352314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Squire, P., Wolfinger, R. E., & Glass, D. P. (1987). Residential mobility and voter turnout. The American Political Science Review, 81(1), 45–65. doi: 10.2307/1960778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stoker, L., & Jennings, M. K. (1995). Life-cycle transitions and political participation: The case of marriage. The American Political Science Review, 89(2), 421–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stoop, I. A. L. (2005). The hunt for the last respondent: Nonresponse in sample surveys. The Hague: SCP.Google Scholar
  58. Tzeng, J. M., & Mare, R. D. (1995). Labor market and socioeconomic effects on marital stability. Social Science Research, 24(4), 329–351. doi: 10.1006/ssre.1995.1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic volunteerism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Burns, N. (2005). Family ties: Understanding the intergenerational transmission of political participation. In A. S. Zuckerman (Ed.), The social logic of politics: Personal networks as contexts for political behavior (pp. 99–114). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Voorpostel, M. (2010). Attrition in the Swiss household panel by demographic characteristics and levels of social involvement. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 36(2), 359–377.Google Scholar
  62. Voorpostel, M., & Coffé, H. (2012). Transitions in partnership and parental status, gender, and political and civic participation. European Sociological Review, 28(1), 28–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wattenberg, M. P. (2007). Is voting for young people?. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  64. Wernli, B. (2007). La transmission intergénérationnelle de l’orientation idéologique en Suisse dans les familles à plusieurs générations. Swiss Political Science Review, 13, 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1998). The contribution of social resources to volunteering. Social Science Quarterly (University of Texas Press), 79(4), 799–814.Google Scholar
  66. Wuthnow, R. (1998). Loose connections: Joining together in America’s fragmented communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FORSUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Political Science and International Relations ProgrammeVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations