Assessing Regional Wellbeing in Italy: An Application of Malmquist–DEA and Self-organizing Map Neural Clustering
- 479 Downloads
Interest in the measurement of wellbeing and quality of life has increased in recent decades and a wide range of statistical and econometric techniques have been used to investigate and measure individual quality of life. Following this line of research, this paper uses data envelopment analysis (DEA) to evaluate the wellbeing performance and ranking of the 20 Italian regions from 2005 to 2011. The analysis is based on 12 indicators which represent some of the different aspects of wellbeing. These include economic conditions, labour market conditions, neighbourhood relationships and the environment. The Malmquist indices obtained from the DEA scores are then used to measure changes in wellbeing over time. The results reveal that northern regions have been performing with more efficiency than southern ones. This paper also uses the self-organizing map technique to cluster regions into homogeneous groups where the within-group-object dissimilarity is minimized and the between-group-object dissimilarity is maximized. The clustering analysis confirms a marked duality in regional wellbeing in Italy.
KeywordsQuality of life Data envelopment analysis (DEA) Self-organizing map neural network Panel data
We are indebted to Regione Autonoma della Sardegna (L.R. 7/2007), project: ‘Social capital and regional economic divide’ for financial support. All the usual disclaimers apply.
- Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & McCulloch, R. (2001). Inequality and happiness: Are European and American different? NBER Working Paper, No 8198, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Ali, A. I. (1994). Computational aspects of data envelopment analysis. In A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, A. Y. Lewin, & L. M. Seiford (Eds.), DEA: Theory, methodology and applications (pp. 63–88). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Andrienko G., Andrienko, N., Bremm, S., Schreck, T., von Landesberger, T., Bak, P., & Keim, D. (2010). Space-in-time and time-in-space self-organizing maps for exploring spatiotemporal patterns. Eurographics/IEEE-VGTC Symposium on Visualization, 29(3), 913–922.Google Scholar
- Anuario Social de España, Fundación La Caixa, Barcelona: various years.Google Scholar
- Bosetti, V., Cassinelli, M., & Lanza, A. (2003). Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate environmentally conscious tourism management. In International conference on tourism and sustainable development, CRENoS Cagliari, Sassari University and World Bank, September 19–20, Chia, Sardinia.Google Scholar
- Boyer, R., & Savageu, D. (1981). Places rated almanac: Your guide to finding the best places to live in America. New York: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
- Campbell, A., Converse, P. F., & Rodgers, W. R. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
- Carboni, O. A., & Russu, P. (2014). Measuring environmental and economic efficiency in Italy: An application of the malmquist-DEA and grey forecasting model. CRENoS, WP 2014_01.Google Scholar
- Cobb, C., Halstead, T., & Rowe, J. (1995). The genuine progress indicator: Summary of data and methodology. San Francisco: Redefining Progress.Google Scholar
- Coelli, T. J. (1996). A guide to DEAP version 2.1: A data envelopment analysis (computer) program. University of New England, Department of Econometrics, CEPA Working Paper No. 8/96, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia. http://www.une.edu.au/econometrics/cepa2.htm#software.
- Coelli, T., Rao, D. S. P., O’Donnel, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Cullinane, K., Song, D. W., & Wang, T. F. (2004). An application of DEA windows analysis to container port production efficiency. Review of Network Economy, 32, 184–206.Google Scholar
- Dasgupta, P. (2000). Population resources and welfare: An exploration into reproductive and environmental externalities. Working paper.Google Scholar
- Erikson, R. (1993). Description of inequality: The Swedish approach to welfare research. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Erikson, R., Hansen, E. J., Ringen, S., & Uusitalo, H. (1987). The Scandinavian model: Welfare states and welfare research. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
- Färe, R. S., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1994). Production frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hashimoto, A. (1999). Proposing non-uniform evaluation in social systems analysis. Discussion paper series, 827 (Institute of Policy and Planning Science, University of Tsukuba).Google Scholar
- Hua, Z., & Bin, Y. (2007). DEA with undesirable factors. In: Zhu, J., & Cook, W. D. (Eds.), Modeling data irregularities and structural complexities in data envelopment analysis (Chap. 6). Springer Science Series.Google Scholar
- Istituto Tagliacarne, various years. http://www.tagliacarne.it/.
- Koua, E. L., & Kraak, M. J. (2008). An integrated exploratory geovisualization environment based on self-organizing map. In Agarwal P., Skupin A., (Eds.), Self-organising maps: Applications in geographic information science (pp. 45–66). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Legambiente Ecosistema Urbano. (2012). XIX Rapporto sulla qualità ambientale dei comuni capoluogo di provincia.Google Scholar
- Liu, B. C. (1976). Quality of life indicators in US metropolitan areas: A statistical analysis. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
- Nordhaus, W. D. (2002). The health of nations: The contribution of improved health to living standards. In K. M. Murphy & R. H. Topel (Eds.), Exceptional returns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Osberg, L., & Sharpe, A. (1998). An index of economic well-being for Canada. Applied Research Branch, Research Paper R-99-3E, Human Resources Development Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
- Osberg, L., & Sharpe, A. (1999). An index of economic well-being for Canada and the United States. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Economic Association, New York, January.Google Scholar
- Pena, J. B. (1977). Problemas de la medición del bienestar y conceptos afines. Una aplicación al Caso Español. (I.N.E.: Madrid).Google Scholar
- Rosen, S. (1979). Wage-based indexes of urban quality of life. In P. Mieszkowsi & M. Stratzheim (Eds.), Current issues in urban economics (pp. 74–104). Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. (2000). Desarrollo y libertad. Barcelona: Editorial Planeta.Google Scholar
- Sirgy, M. J., & Cornwell, T. (2001). Further validation of the Sirgy et al. ’s measure of community quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 56(12), 5–143.Google Scholar
- Sole24ore, various years, Dossier sull’Italia: Qualità di vita. www.ilsole24ore.com.
- Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty on the United Kingdom. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Viscovery SOMine lite Version 2.1. (1998). User’s manual Eudaptics software GMBH, Austria.Google Scholar
- Yiengprugsawan, Y., Seubsman, S., Khamman, S., Lim, L., & Sleigh, A. (2010). Personal wellbeing index in a national cohort of 87,134 Thai adults. Social Indicators Research, 98, 201–215.Google Scholar