Nonreligious Group Factors Versus Religious Belief in the Prediction of Prosociality
- 664 Downloads
Previous research has suggested that religious belief is associated with a range of prosocial behaviors such as social embeddedness and generosity. However, this literature has often conflated belief in God with group involvement and failed to control for demographic and social network effects. Rather than assessing prosociality by comparing religious group members with the unaffiliated, the present study also includes secular/nonreligious group members. Multiple regression analyses controlling for confounds diminishes many of the apparent differences between religious and nonreligious individuals. Belief in God itself accounts for approximately 1–2 % of the variance in social embeddedness domains and <1 % of the variance in the domains of outside-group charity and community volunteering. Belief in God is associated with homophily and parochial behavior such as within-group charitable donations and constrained contact with different others. These findings indicate that prosocial benefits are more related to general group membership equally available to religious and secular group members alike than they are to specifically religious content. Religious beliefs are related to within-group prosociality as well as homophily and parochialism directed to those outside the group.
KeywordsReligion Secular Prosocial Charity Ingroup
- Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2007). Generosity and philanthropy: A literature review. Rochester. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1015507.
- Brooks, A. C. (2006). Who really cares: The surprising truth about compassionate conservatism. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Campbell, D. E., & Yonish, S. J. (2003). Religion and volunteering in America. In C. Smidt (Ed.), Religion as social capital: Producing the common good (pp. 87–106). Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
- Center on Wealth and Philanthropy. (2007). Geography and giving: The culture of philanthropy in New England and the nation. Boston, MA: Boston Foundation. http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/research_sites/cwp/pdf/geoandgiving2007.pdf.
- Choi, N. G., & DiNittio, D. M. (2012). Predictors of time volunteering, religious giving, and secular giving: Implications for nonprofit organizations. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 39, 93–120.Google Scholar
- Galef, J. (2010). Fall brings record numbers of atheist, agnostic student organizations on campus. http://www.secularstudents.org/recordnumbergroups2010.
- Greenfield, E. A., & Marks, N. F. (2007). Religious social identity as an explanatory factor for associations between more frequent formal religious participation and psychological well-being. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17, 245–259. doi: 10.1080/10508610701402309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hunsberger, B. E., & Altemeyer, R. A. (2006). Atheists: A groundbreaking study of America’s nonbelievers. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.Google Scholar
- Hunsberger, B., & Platonow, E. (1986). Religion and helping charitable causes. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 120, 517–528. http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.gvsu.edu/docview/617397811?accountid=39473.
- Kosmin, B. A., Keysar, A., Cragun, R. T., & Navarro-Rivera, J. (2009). American nones: The profile of the no religion population. Hartford, CT: Institute for the Study of Secularism in Society and Culture.Google Scholar
- LaBouff, J., Rowatt, W. C., Johnson, M. K., & Finkle, C. (2012). Differences in attitudes towards outgroups in a religious or non-religious context in a multi-national sample: A situational context priming study. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 22, 1–9. doi: 10.1080/10508619.2012.634778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lincoln, R., Morrissey, C. A., & Mundey, P. (2008). Religious giving: A literature review. http://generosityresearch.nd.edu/assets/20447/religious_giving_final.pdf.
- McKitrick, M. A., Landres, J. S., Ottoni-Wilhelm, M., & Hayat, A. D. (2013). Connected to give: Faith communities. Jumpstart Labs: Key findings from the national study of American religious giving.Google Scholar
- Monsma, S. V. (2007). Religion and philanthropic giving and volunteerism: Building blocks for civic responsibility. Interdisciplinary Journal of Religious Research, 3, 2–28.Google Scholar
- Myers, D. G. (2008). A friendly letter to skeptics and atheists: Musings on why God is good and faith isn’t evil. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Oliner, S. P., & Oliner, P. M. (1988). The altruistic personality: Rescuers of Jews in Nazi Europe. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Pasquale, F. L. (2012). A portrait of secular group affiliates. In P. Zuckerman (Ed.), Atheism and secularity (pp. 43–87). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Pelham, B., & Crabtree, S. (20088). Worldwide, highly religious more likely to help others. http://www.gallup.com/poll/111013/worldwide-highly-religious-more-likely-help-others.aspx.
- Pew Research Center. (2008). The Pew Forum on religion and public life: U.S. religious landscape survey. http://religions.pewforum.org/pdf/report-religious-landscape-study-full.pdf.
- Pew Research Center. (2012). “Nones” on the rise: One-in-five adults have no religious affiliation. http://www.pewforum.org/uploadedFiles/Topics/Religious_Affiliation/Unaffiliated/NonesOnTheRise-full.pdf.
- Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Putnam, R. D., & Campbell, D. E. (2010). American grace: How religion divides and unites us. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Regnerus, M. D. (2003). Religion and positive adolescent outcomes: A review of research and theory. Review of Religious Research, 44, 394–413. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3512217.
- Reitsma, J., Scheepers, P., & te Grotenhuis, M. (2006). Dimensions of individual religiosity and charity: Cross-national effect differences in European countries? Review of Religious Research, 47, 347–362.Google Scholar
- Russell, D., & Cutrona, C. E. (1984). The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
- Salsman, J. M., Brown, T. L., Brechting, E. H., & Carlson, C. R. (2005). The link between religion and spirituality and psychological adjustment: The mediating role of optimism and social support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 522–535. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saroglou, V. (2006). Religion’s role in prosocial behavior: Myth or reality? Psychology of Religion Newsletter, 31, 1–8.Google Scholar
- Smith, B. G., & Stark, R. (2009). Religious attendance relates to generosity worldwide. http://www.gallup.com/poll/122807/Religious-Attendance-Relates-Generosity-Worldwide.aspx.
- Stark, R., & Maier, J. (2008). Faith and happiness. Review of Religious Research, 50, 120–125.Google Scholar
- Uslaner, E. M. (2001). Volunteering and social capital: How trust and religion shape civic participation in the United States. In P. Dekker & E. M. Uslaner (Eds.), Social capital and participation in everyday life (pp. 104–117). London: Routledge.Google Scholar