Social Indicators Research

, Volume 122, Issue 2, pp 411–432 | Cite as

Nonreligious Group Factors Versus Religious Belief in the Prediction of Prosociality

Article

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that religious belief is associated with a range of prosocial behaviors such as social embeddedness and generosity. However, this literature has often conflated belief in God with group involvement and failed to control for demographic and social network effects. Rather than assessing prosociality by comparing religious group members with the unaffiliated, the present study also includes secular/nonreligious group members. Multiple regression analyses controlling for confounds diminishes many of the apparent differences between religious and nonreligious individuals. Belief in God itself accounts for approximately 1–2 % of the variance in social embeddedness domains and <1 % of the variance in the domains of outside-group charity and community volunteering. Belief in God is associated with homophily and parochial behavior such as within-group charitable donations and constrained contact with different others. These findings indicate that prosocial benefits are more related to general group membership equally available to religious and secular group members alike than they are to specifically religious content. Religious beliefs are related to within-group prosociality as well as homophily and parochialism directed to those outside the group.

Keywords

Religion Secular Prosocial Charity Ingroup 

References

  1. Baumeister, R. F., Bauer, I. M., & Lloyd, S. A. (2010). Choice, free will, and religion. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2, 67–82. doi:10.1037/a0018455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2007). Generosity and philanthropy: A literature review. Rochester. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1015507.
  3. Berggren, N., & Bjørnskov, C. (2011). Is the importance of religion in daily life related to social trust? Cross-country and cross-state comparisons. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 80, 459–480. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beyerlein, K., & Hipp, J. R. (2006). From pews to participation: The effect of congregation activity and context on bridging civic engagement. Social Problems, 53, 97–117. doi:10.1525/sp.2006.53.1.97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blogowska, J., Lambert, C., & Saroglou, V. (2013). Religious prosociality and aggression: It’s real. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52, 524–536. doi:10.1111/jssr.12048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blogowska, J., & Saroglou, V. (2011). Religious fundamentalism and limited prosociality as a function of the target. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50, 44–60. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01551.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bloom, P. (2012). Religion, morality, evolution. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 179–199. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bock, D. C., & Warren, N. C. (1972). Religious belief as a factor in obedience to destructive demands. Review of Religious Research, 13, 185–191. doi:10.2307/3510781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooks, A. C. (2006). Who really cares: The surprising truth about compassionate conservatism. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, D. E., & Yonish, S. J. (2003). Religion and volunteering in America. In C. Smidt (Ed.), Religion as social capital: Producing the common good (pp. 87–106). Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Center on Wealth and Philanthropy. (2007). Geography and giving: The culture of philanthropy in New England and the nation. Boston, MA: Boston Foundation. http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/research_sites/cwp/pdf/geoandgiving2007.pdf.
  12. Cheadle, J. E., & Schwadel, P. (2012). The ‘friendship dynamics of religion’, or the ‘religious dynamics of friendship’? A social network analysis of adolescents who attend small schools. Social Science Research, 41, 1198–1212. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.03.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Choi, N. G., & DiNittio, D. M. (2012). Predictors of time volunteering, religious giving, and secular giving: Implications for nonprofit organizations. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 39, 93–120.Google Scholar
  14. Cornwall, M. (1987). The social bases of religion: A study of factors influencing religious belief and commitment. Review of Religious Research, 29, 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Donelson, E. (1999). Psychology of religion and adolescents in the United States: Past to present. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 187–204. doi:10.1006/jado.1999.0212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Driskell, R. L., Lyon, L., & Embry, E. (2008). Civic engagement and religious activities: Examining the influence of religious tradition and participation. Sociological Spectrum, 28, 578–601. doi:10.1080/02732170802206229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellison, C. G., & George, L. K. (1994). Religious involvement, social ties, and social support in a southeastern community. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 33, 46–61. doi:10.2307/1386636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fitzgerald, C. J., & Wickwire, J. H. (2012). Religion and political affiliation’s influence on trust and reciprocity among strangers. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 6, 158–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Galef, J. (2010). Fall brings record numbers of atheist, agnostic student organizations on campus. http://www.secularstudents.org/recordnumbergroups2010.
  20. Galen, L. W. (2012). Does religious belief promote prosociality? A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 876–906. doi:10.1037/a0028251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galen, L. W., & Kloet, J. (2011). Personality and social integration factors distinguishing non-religious from religious groups: The importance of controlling for attendance and demographics. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 33, 205–228. doi:10.1163/157361211X570047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gebauer, J. E., Paulhus, D. L., & Neberich, W. (2013). Big two personality and religiosity across cultures: Communals as religious conformists and agentics as religious contrarians. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. George, L. K., Ellison, C. G., & Larson, D. B. (2002). Explaining the relationships between religious involvement and health. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 190–200. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1303_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Good, M., Willoughby, T., & Fritjers, J. (2009). Just another club? The distinctiveness of the relation between religious service attendance and adolescent psychosocial adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 1153–1171. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9320-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 140–150. doi:10.1177/1088868309353415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greenfield, E. A., & Marks, N. F. (2007). Religious social identity as an explanatory factor for associations between more frequent formal religious participation and psychological well-being. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17, 245–259. doi:10.1080/10508610701402309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hempel, L. M., Matthews, T., & Bartkowski, J. (2012). Trust in a “fallen world”: The case of Protestant theological conservatism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51, 522–541. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01662.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hunsberger, B. E., & Altemeyer, R. A. (2006). Atheists: A groundbreaking study of America’s nonbelievers. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.Google Scholar
  29. Hunsberger, B., & Platonow, E. (1986). Religion and helping charitable causes. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 120, 517–528. http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.gvsu.edu/docview/617397811?accountid=39473.
  30. Jackson, E. F., Bachmeier, M. D., Wood, J. R., & Craft, E. A. (1995). Volunteering and charitable giving: Do religious and associated ties promote helping behaviors? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 24, 59–78. doi:10.1177/089976409502400108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson, M. K., Rowatt, W. C., & LaBouff, J. (2010). Priming Christian religious concepts increases racial prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 119–126. doi:10.1177/1948550609357246.Google Scholar
  32. Kim, Y. I., & Wilcox, W. B. (2013). Bonding alone: Familism, religion, and secular civic participation. Social Science Research, 42, 31–45. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kosmin, B. A., Keysar, A., Cragun, R. T., & Navarro-Rivera, J. (2009). American nones: The profile of the no religion population. Hartford, CT: Institute for the Study of Secularism in Society and Culture.Google Scholar
  34. LaBouff, J., Rowatt, W. C., Johnson, M. K., & Finkle, C. (2012). Differences in attitudes towards outgroups in a religious or non-religious context in a multi-national sample: A situational context priming study. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 22, 1–9. doi:10.1080/10508619.2012.634778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lam, P. (2002). As the flocks gather: How religion affects voluntary association participation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 405–422. doi:10.1111/1468-5906.00127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lewis, V. A., MacGregor, C. A., & Putnam, R. D. (2013). Religion, networks, and neighborliness: The impact of religious social networks on civic engagement. Social Science Research, 42, 331–346. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.09.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lim, C., & Putnam, R. D. (2010). Religion, social networks, and life satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 75, 914–933. doi:10.1177/0003122410386686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lincoln, R., Morrissey, C. A., & Mundey, P. (2008). Religious giving: A literature review. http://generosityresearch.nd.edu/assets/20447/religious_giving_final.pdf.
  39. Manning, L. (2010). Gender and religious differences associated with volunteering in later life. Journal of Women and Aging, 22, 125–135. doi:10.1080/08952841003719224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McCullough, M. E., Hoyt, W. T., Larson, D. B., Koenig, H. G., & Thoresen, C. (2000). Religious involvement and mortality: A metaanalytic review. Health Psychology, 19, 211–222. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.3.211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McCullough, M. E., & Willoughby, B. L. B. (2009). Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: Associations, explanations, and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 69–93. doi:10.1037/a0014213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McKitrick, M. A., Landres, J. S., Ottoni-Wilhelm, M., & Hayat, A. D. (2013). Connected to give: Faith communities. Jumpstart Labs: Key findings from the national study of American religious giving.Google Scholar
  43. Mochon, D., Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2011). Who benefits from religion? Social Indicators Research, 101, 1–15. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9637-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Monsma, S. V. (2007). Religion and philanthropic giving and volunteerism: Building blocks for civic responsibility. Interdisciplinary Journal of Religious Research, 3, 2–28.Google Scholar
  45. Myers, D. G. (2000). The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. American Psychologist, 55, 56–67. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Myers, D. G. (2008). A friendly letter to skeptics and atheists: Musings on why God is good and faith isn’t evil. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  47. Oliner, S. P., & Oliner, P. M. (1988). The altruistic personality: Rescuers of Jews in Nazi Europe. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  48. Park, J. Z., & Smith, C. (2000). “To whom much has been given…”: Religious capital and community voluntarism among churchgoing Protestants. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 39, 272–286. doi:10.1111/0021-8294.00023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pasquale, F. L. (2012). A portrait of secular group affiliates. In P. Zuckerman (Ed.), Atheism and secularity (pp. 43–87). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
  50. Pelham, B., & Crabtree, S. (20088). Worldwide, highly religious more likely to help others. http://www.gallup.com/poll/111013/worldwide-highly-religious-more-likely-help-others.aspx.
  51. Pepper, M., Jackson, T., & Uzzell, D. (2010). A study of multidimensional religion constructs and values in the United Kingdom. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49, 127–146. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01496.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pew Research Center. (2008). The Pew Forum on religion and public life: U.S. religious landscape survey. http://religions.pewforum.org/pdf/report-religious-landscape-study-full.pdf.
  53. Pew Research Center. (2012). “Nones” on the rise: One-in-five adults have no religious affiliation. http://www.pewforum.org/uploadedFiles/Topics/Religious_Affiliation/Unaffiliated/NonesOnTheRise-full.pdf.
  54. Piper, G., & Schnepf, S. V. (2008). Gender differences in charitable giving in Great Britain. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 19, 103–124. doi:10.1007/s11266-008-9057-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Preston, J. L., Ritter, R. S., & Hernandez, J. I. (2010). Principles of religious prosociality: A review and reformulation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 574–590. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00286.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  57. Putnam, R. D., & Campbell, D. E. (2010). American grace: How religion divides and unites us. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  58. Regnerus, M. D. (2003). Religion and positive adolescent outcomes: A review of research and theory. Review of Religious Research, 44, 394–413. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3512217.
  59. Reitsma, J., Scheepers, P., & te Grotenhuis, M. (2006). Dimensions of individual religiosity and charity: Cross-national effect differences in European countries? Review of Religious Research, 47, 347–362.Google Scholar
  60. Rhodes, J. (2012). The ties that divide: Bonding social capital, religious friendship networks, and political tolerance among evangelicals. Sociological Inquiry, 82, 163–186. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2012.00409.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Russell, D., & Cutrona, C. E. (1984). The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  62. Salsman, J. M., Brown, T. L., Brechting, E. H., & Carlson, C. R. (2005). The link between religion and spirituality and psychological adjustment: The mediating role of optimism and social support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 522–535. doi:10.1177/0146167204271563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Saroglou, V. (2006). Religion’s role in prosocial behavior: Myth or reality? Psychology of Religion Newsletter, 31, 1–8.Google Scholar
  64. Saroglou, V. (2012). Is religion not prosocial at all? Comment on Galen (2012). Psychological Bulletin, 138, 907–912. doi:10.1037/a0028927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Saroglou, V., Delpierre, V., & Dernelle, R. (2004). Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz’s model. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 721–734. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2003.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schoenfeld, E. (1978). Image of man: The effect of religion on trust. Review of Religious Research, 20, 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schwartz, S. H., & Huismans, S. (1995). Value priorities and religiosity in four Western religions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 88–107. doi:10.2307/2787148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shor, E., & Roelfs, D. J. (2013). The longevity effects of religious and nonreligious participation: A meta-analysis and meta-regression. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52, 120–145. doi:10.1111/jssr.12006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Smith, J. M. (2013). Creating a Godless community: The collective identity work of contemporary American atheists. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52, 80–99. doi:10.1111/jssr.12009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Smith, B. G., & Stark, R. (2009). Religious attendance relates to generosity worldwide. http://www.gallup.com/poll/122807/Religious-Attendance-Relates-Generosity-Worldwide.aspx.
  71. Son, J., & Wilson, J. (2012). Using normative theory to explain the effect of religion and education on volunteering. Sociological Perspectives, 55(3), 473–499. doi:10.1525/sop.2012.55.3.473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stark, R., & Maier, J. (2008). Faith and happiness. Review of Religious Research, 50, 120–125.Google Scholar
  73. Stroope, S. (2011). How culture shapes community: Bible belief, theological unity, and a sense of belonging in religious congregations. The Sociological Quarterly, 52(4), 568–592. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01220.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tan, J. H. W., & Vogel, C. (2008). Religion and trust: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 832–848. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2008.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Taniguchi, H., & Thomas, L. D. (2011). The influences of religious attitudes on volunteering. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22, 335–355. doi:10.1007/s11266-010-9158-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Uslaner, E. M. (2001). Volunteering and social capital: How trust and religion shape civic participation in the United States. In P. Dekker & E. M. Uslaner (Eds.), Social capital and participation in everyday life (pp. 104–117). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  77. Wang, L., & Graddy, E. (2008). Social capital, volunteering, and charitable giving. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 19, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yeary, K., Ounpraseuth, S., Moore, P., Bursac, Z., & Greene, P. (2012). Religion, social capital, and health. Review of Religious Research, 54, 331–347. doi:10.1007/s13644-011-0048-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yen, S. T. (2002). An econometric analysis of household donations in the USA. Applied Economics Letters, 9, 837–841. doi:10.1080/13504850210148189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyGrand Valley State UniversityAllendaleUSA

Personalised recommendations