Measuring and Predicting Student Well-Being: Further Evidence in Support of the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experiences
- 1.3k Downloads
An increased focus on well-being in university settings has spurred the development of brief scales of both functioning well and feeling good. The objectives of the current study were to generate descriptive findings concerning psychometric properties (e.g., factor structure; reliability) of the recently devised Flourishing Scale (FS) and Scale of Positive and Negative Experiences (SPANE; Diener et al., Soc Indic Res 97:143–156, 2010) with an English-speaking university student sample, and to test associations between the scales and potential predictors of eudaimonic and hedonic aspects of well-being. The FS and SPANE scales were completed by 478 undergraduate students, along with scales measuring 10 human values and both time and material affluence. Descriptive statistics (e.g., means, standard deviations, reliability coefficients) for the FS and SPANE scales were highly similar to those reported by Diener et al. (Soc Indic Res 97:143–156, 2010) and confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesized three-factor model (i.e., flourishing, positive feelings, and negative feelings). Self-transcendence and conservation value types were significant predictors of FS scores, whereas only the conservation value type predicted affect balance scores from the SPANE. Time and material affluence were significant predictors of both FS and affect balance scores. Results are discussed in relation to the distinction between eudaimonic and hedonic aspects of well-being.
KeywordsFlourishing Positive feelings Negative feelings Human values Time affluence Material affluence
The authors wish to thank Chantal Beaudoin and Alan Vladicka for their significant involvement in supporting and facilitating this project.
- Bauer, J. J. (2008). How the ego quiets as it grows: Ego development, growth stories, and eudaimonic personality development. In H. A. Wayment & J. J. Bauer (Eds.), Transcending self-interest: Psychological explorations of the quiet ego (pp. 199–209). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chan, G., Miller, P., & Tcha, M. (2005). Happiness in university education. International Review of Economics Education, 4, 20–45.Google Scholar
- Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2012). World happiness report. The Earth Institute.Google Scholar
- Kasser, T., & Brown, K. W. (2003). On time, happiness, and ecological footprints. In J. D. Graaf (Ed.), Take back your time: Fighting overwork and time poverty in America (pp. 107–112). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
- Leary, M. R., & Guadagno, J. (2011). The role of hypo-egoic self-processes in optimal functioning and subjective well-being. In K. M. Sheldon, T. B. Kashdan, & M. F. Steger (Eds.), Designing positive psychology: Taking stock and moving forward (pp. 135–146). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Li, F., Bai, X., & Wang, Y. (2013). The scale of positive and negative experience (SPANE): Psychometric properties and normative data in a large Chinese sample. PLoS ONE, 8, 1–9.Google Scholar
- Michalos, A. C. (1991). Global report on student well-being: Volume I, Life satisfaction and happiness. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Sagiv, L., Roccas, S., & Hazan, O. (2004). Value pathways to well-being: Healthy values, valued goal attainment, and environmental congruence. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 68–85). New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1) doi: 10.9707/2307-0919.1116.
- Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and wellbeing. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar