Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Parent–Child Proximity: Automatic Cognitions Matter

Abstract

Individuals’ moving behavior (e.g., residential mobility) is an emerging topic in many scientific disciplines. One specific aspect is the distance between parents and their children (i.e., parent–child proximity). Although determinants and moderators of parent–child proximity can be manifold, we concentrated on the psychological concepts self-esteem and affect by assessing explicit (i.e., conscious) and implicit (i.e., automatic) aspects. Besides well-known correlates of moving behavior (e.g., education), we found that participants (N = 1,765; cross-sectional design) with high positive explicit affect and low negative implicit affect moved further away from their parents’ homes. Therefore, parent–child proximity may not be only based on fundamental sociocultural and socioeconomic needs (e.g., income, family bonds), but also on automatic psychological aspects, such as implicit affect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    We also calculated a linear regression by including interaction terms between implicit and explicit affect as well as implicit and explicit self-esteem (see Jordan et al. 2003). These interaction terms were included in the regression analysis in a separate block to see whether the interaction terms have additional predictive power. Although we found some low effect (β = .07) of the interaction between explicit self-esteem (RSES) and implicit self-esteem measured with the IPT-last on parent–child proximity, this additional block in the regression analysis was not significant, ΔF(6,1,731) = 1.82, p = .09. Doing the same hierarchical linear regression with the reversed order of blocks, the interaction terms failed to explain any of the variance, F(6,1,743) = 1.40, p = .21.

  2. 2.

    One reviewer correctly pointed out that some of the prerequisites of a linear regression might be violated. In combination with the interpretation of low effect sizes, this could be problematic because some effects might be erratic. Nevertheless, a categorical regression taking the different levels of measurements of the predictor variables into account, revealed basically the same pattern (i.e., significance of sex, education, EPA, INA), which again speaks for the robustness of our findings (detailed results omitted for brevity).

  3. 3.

    The same analysis was performed with the real distance between participants and their parents. Again the logarithmic, quadratic, and cubic relationship did not substantially differ from the linear model (all R 2 ~ .01).

References

  1. Altman, I., & Low, S. M. (1992). Place attachment. New York: Plenum.

  2. Anseel, F., & Duyck, W. (2008). Unconscious applicants: A systematic test of the name-letter effect. Psychological Science, 19, 1059–1061. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02199.x.

  3. Baccus, J. R., Baldwin, M. W., & Packer, D. J. (2004). Increasing implicit self-esteem through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 15, 498–502. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00708.x.

  4. Gebauer, J. E., Riketta, M., Broemer, P., & Maio, G. R. (2008). How much do you like your name? An implicit measure of global self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1346–1354. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.016.

  5. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.102.1.4.

  6. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.

  7. Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41. doi:10.1037/a0015575.

  8. Gregg, A. P., & Sedikides, C. (2010). Narcissistic fragility: Rethinking its links to explicit and implicit self-esteem. Self and Identity, 9, 142–161. doi:10.1080/15298860902815451.

  9. Guo, M., Chi, I., & Silverstein, M. (2011). Family as a context: The influence of family composition and family geographic dispersion on intergenerational relationships among Chinese elderly. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20, 18–29. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00793.x.

  10. Ha, J. H., & Carr, D. (2005). The effect of parent-child geographic proximity on widowed parents’ psychological adjustment and social integration. Research on Aging, 27, 578–610. doi:10.1177/0164027505277977.

  11. Hank, K. (2007). Proximity and contacts between older parents and their children: A European comparison. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 157–173. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00351.x.

  12. Jokela, M., Elovainio, M., Kivimaki, M., & Keltikangas-Jarvinen, L. (2008). Temperament and migration patterns in Finland. Psychological Science, 19, 831–837. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02164.x.

  13. Jordan, C. H., Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., Hoshino-Browne, E., & Coreel, J. (2003). Secure and defensive high self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 969–978. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.969.

  14. Kitayama, S., & Karasawa, M. (1997). Implicit self-esteem in Japan: Name letters and birthday numbers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 736–742. doi:10.1177/0146167297237006.

  15. Krohne, H. W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C. W., & Tausch, A. (1996). Investigations with a German version of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Diagnostica, 42, 139–156.

  16. Leopold, T., Geißler, F., & Pink, S. (2012). How far do children move? Spatial distances after leaving the parental home. Social Science Research, 41, 991–1002. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.03.004.

  17. Lin, G., & Rogerson, P. A. (1995). Elderly parents and the geographic availability of their adult children. Research on Aging, 17, 303–331. doi:10.1177/0164027595173004.

  18. Nuttin, J. M. (1985). Narcissism beyond gestalt and awareness: The name letter effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 353–361. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420150309.

  19. Oishi, S. (2010). The psychology of residential mobility: Implications for the self, social relationships, and well-being. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 5–21. doi:10.1177/1745691609356781.

  20. Oishi, S., Krochik, M., Roth, D., & Sherman, G. D. (2012a). Residential mobility, personality, and subjective and physical well-being: An analysis of cortisol secretion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 153–161. doi:10.1177/1948550611412395.

  21. Oishi, S., Miao, F. F., Koo, M., Kisling, J., & Ratliff, K. A. (2012b). Residential mobility breeds familiarity-seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 149–162. doi:10.1037/a0024949.

  22. Oishi, S., & Schimmack, U. (2010). Residential mobility, well-being, and mortality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 980–994. doi:10.1037/a0019389.

  23. Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., & Stewart, B. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277.

  24. Pelham, B. W., Mirenberg, M. C., & Jones, J. T. (2002). Why Susie sells seashells by the seashore: Implicit egotism and major life decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 469–487. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.4.469.

  25. Quirin, M., Kazén, M., & Kuhl, J. (2009). When nonsense sounds happy or helpless: The implicit positive and negative affect test (IPANAT). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 500–516. doi:10.1037/a0016063.

  26. Reher, D. S. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review, 24, 203–234. doi:10.2307/2807972.

  27. Silventoinen, K., Hammar, N., Hedlund, E., Koskenvuo, M., Rönnemaa, T., & Kaprio, J. (2008). Selective international migration by social position, health behaviour and personality. The European Journal of Public Health, 18, 150–155. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckm052.

  28. Simonsohn, U. (2011). Spurious also? Name similarity effects (implicit egotism) in employer decisions. Psychological Science, 22, 1087–1089. doi:10.1177/0956797611413937.

  29. Statistics Austria (2012). Internal migrations. Retrieved from http://www.statistik.at/web_en/statistics/population/migration/internal_migration/index.html.

  30. Stieger, S. (2013). Implicit anxiety: No evidence for a relation with childhood fears and parental rearing behaviour. Psychologica Belgica, 53, 75–91.

  31. Stieger, S., & Burger, C. (2013). More complex than previously thought: New insights into the optimal administration of the initial preference task. Self and Identity, 12, 201–216. doi:10.1080/15298868.2012.655897.

  32. Stieger, S., Voracek, M., & Formann, A. K. (2012). How to administer the initial preference task. European Journal of Personality, 26, 63–78. doi:10.1002/per.823.

  33. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2009). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1.

  34. Tomassini, C., Wolf, D. A., & Rosina, A. (2003). Parental housing assistance and parent-child proximity in Italy. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65, 700–715. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00700.x.

  35. von Collani, G., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2003). A revision of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale in German language. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 3–7. doi:10.1024//0170-1789.24.1.3.

  36. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Stefan Stieger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stieger, S., Voracek, M. & Nader, I.W. Parent–Child Proximity: Automatic Cognitions Matter. Soc Indic Res 119, 967–978 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0524-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Implicit cognitions
  • Moving behavior
  • Parent–child proximity
  • Positive/negative affect
  • Self-esteem