Social Indicators Research

, Volume 119, Issue 2, pp 747–756 | Cite as

Mediating Effects of Affect and Loneliness on the Relationship Between Core Self-evaluation and Life Satisfaction Among Two Groups of Chinese Adolescents

  • Dan He
  • Mei Shi
  • Fang Yi


This study examined the mediating effects of affect (positive and negative affect) and loneliness on the relationship between core self-evaluations (CSE) and life satisfaction among two groups of Chinese adolescents. Three hundred adolescents (169 males and 131 females) from Shenzhen and Xi’an in China completed the Core Self-evaluations Scale, Positive and Negative Affect Scale, UCLA Loneliness and Satisfaction with Life Scale. Research revealed that positive and negative affect, and loneliness fully mediated the relationship between CSE and life satisfaction. The relationship between CSE and loneliness was partially mediated by positive and negative affect. Loneliness partially mediated the relation between positive and negative affect and life satisfaction. The final model also indicated two significant paths from CSE through positive and negative affect and loneliness to life satisfaction. Furthermore, a multi-group analysis found that the paths did not differ across gender. Limitations of the study are considered and implications of the results for enhancing adolescents’ life satisfaction are discussed.


Core self-evaluations Positive and negative affect Loneliness Life satisfaction Adolescents 


  1. Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice. A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argyle, M. (1987). The psychology of happiness. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  4. Baudin, N., Aluja, A., Rolland, J. P., & Blanch, A. (2011). The role of personality in satisfaction with life and sport. Behavioral Psychology/Psicologia Conductual, 19, 333–345.Google Scholar
  5. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Danna, K., & Griffin, R. (1999). Health and well-being in the workplace: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Management, 25, 357–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E., Diener, M., Diener, C., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  12. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Erez, A., & Judge, T. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations to goal setting, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1270–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fees, B. S., Martin, P., & Poon, L. W. (1999). A model of loneliness in older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 54B, 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S. (2006). Characteristics of adolescents who report very high life satisfaction. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Joshanloo, M., Rostami, R., & Nosratabadi, M. (2006). Gender differences in social well-being predictors. Journal of Psychological Sciences, 18, 166–184.Google Scholar
  18. Judge, T. A. (2009). Core self-evaluations and work success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Erez, A., & Locke, E. A. (2005). Core self-evaluations and job and life satisfaction: The role of self-concordance and goal attainment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 693–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The Core Self-Evaluations Scale: Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151–188.Google Scholar
  23. Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (p. 3). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  24. Kwan, V. S. Y., Bond, M. H., & Singelis, T. M. (1997). Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1038–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lai, J. H., Bond, M. H., & Hui, N. H. (2007). The role of social axioms in predicting life satisfaction: A longitudinal study in Hong Kong. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 517–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Landis, R. S., Beal, D. J., & Tesluk, P. E. (2000). A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 186–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Law, K. S., Wong, C. S., & Song, L. J. (2004). The construct and criterion validity of meta-mood experience and its potential utility for management studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 483–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu, Y., Wang, Z. H., & Li, Z. G. (2012). Affective mediators of the influence of neuroticism and resilience on life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Difference, 52, 833–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Macknon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Park, N., & Huebner, E. S. (2005). A cross-cultural study of the levels and correlates of life satisfaction among adolescents. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 444–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Quintana, S. M., & Maxwell, S. E. (1999). Implications of recent development in structural equation modeling for counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 27, 485–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Russell, J. E. A. (2008). Promoting subjective well-being at work. Journal of Career Assessment, 16, 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schimmack, U., Radhakrishnan, P., Oishi, S., & Dzokoto, V. (2002). Culture, personality, and subjective well-being: Intergrating process models of life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 582–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schwartz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (p. 3). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  39. Shankar, A., McMunn, A., & Banks, J. (2011). Loneliness, social isolation, and behavioral and biological health indicators in older adults. Health Psychology, 30, 377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stoia-Caraballo, R., Rye, M. S., Pan, W., Kirschman, K. J. B., Lutz-Zois, C., & Lyons, A. M. (2008). Negative affect and anger rumination as mediators between forgiveness and sleep quality. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31, 478–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S. S., & DeVries, M. W. (1999). Ecological momentary assessment. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (p. 3). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  42. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wei, M., Shaffer, P. A., Young, S. K., & Zakalik, R. A. (2005). Adult attachment, shame, depression, and loneliness: The mediation role of basic psychological needs satisfaction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 591–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yan, X., & Su, J. K. (2012). Core self-evaluations mediators of the influence of social support on job involvement in hospital nurses. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0093-x.
  45. Yan, X., Su, J. K., Zhu, X., & He, D. (2012). Loneliness and subjective happiness as mediators of the effects of core self-evaluations on life satisfaction among Chinese college students. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0172-z.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan He
    • 1
  • Mei Shi
    • 2
  • Fang Yi
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology CollegeJiangxi Normal UniversityNanchangPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Education ScienceYan’an UniversityYan’anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations