Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 118, Issue 2, pp 617–643 | Cite as

An Assessment of Life Satisfaction Responses on Recent Statistics Canada Surveys

  • Aneta BonikowskaEmail author
  • John F. Helliwell
  • Feng Hou
  • Grant Schellenberg
Article

Abstract

Statistics Canada’s General Social Survey (GSS) and Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) offer a valuable opportunity to examine the stability of life satisfaction responses and their correlates from year to year within a consistent analytical framework. Capitalizing on the strengths of these surveys, this paper addresses two questions. First, how much variability is observed from year to year and across surveys in the distribution of life satisfaction responses and what accounts for it? Second, how much variability is observed in the direction and magnitude of the correlation between life satisfaction and a consistent set of socioeconomic characteristics? The study shows that the mean level of life satisfaction reported varies from year to year in the GSS but remains stable in the CCHS. This pattern in variability is associated with survey content preceding the life satisfaction question. In contrast, the direction and magnitude of the relationships between life satisfaction and common socioeconomic characteristics is generally consistent between the two surveys and over time.

Keywords

Life evaluations Subjective well-being Satisfaction with life Surveys Data quality 

References

  1. Barrington-Leigh, C. P. (2010). The Québec convergence and Canadian life satisfaction 19852008. Paper presented at the 44th annual conference of the Canadian Economics Association, Quebec City, May 28 to 30, 2010. Available at: http://wellbeing.ihsp.mcgill.ca/publications/Barrington-Leigh-DRAFT2010-Quebec-v2010.pdf. Accessed 2 April 2013.
  2. Barrington-Leigh, C. P. (2013). The Québec convergence and Canadian life satisfaction 1985–2008. Canadian Public Policy, 39(2), 193–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, A. E., Diener, E., Georgellis, Y., & Lucas, R. (2008). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. The Economic Journal, 118, F222–F243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Durkheim, E. (1897). Le suicide (1st ed.). Paris: F. Alcan.Google Scholar
  5. Durkheim, E. (1952). Suicide: A study in sociology (trans: Spaulding, J. A. and Simpson, G.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  6. Heady, B., & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Helliwell, J. F. (2007). Well-being and social capital: Does suicide pose a puzzle? Social Indicators Research, 81(3), 455–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Helliwell, J. F., & Huang, H. (2010). How’s the job? Well-being and social capital in the workplace. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 63(2), 205–227.Google Scholar
  9. Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (Eds.). (2012). World happiness report. New York: Earth Institute, Columbia University. Available at: www.earth.columbia.edu/articles/view/2960. Accessed 2 April 2013.
  10. Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 359, 1435–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Helliwell, J. F., & Wang, S. (2013). Weekends and subjective well-being. Social indicators research. http://www.springerlink.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0306-y. Accessed 15 May 2013 (formerly NBER Working Paper no. 17180).
  12. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2006). Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science, 312, 1908–1910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lucas, R. E. (2007). Adaptation and the set-point model of subjective well-being: Does happiness change after major life events? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(2), 75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Office for National Statistics. (2012). Summary of results from testing of experimental subjective well-being questionsDecember 2012. Measuring National Well-being Programme. Newport, South Wales: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
  15. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264191655-en. Accessed 8 April 2013.
  16. Oshio, T., & Kobayashi, M. (2010). Income inequality, perceived happiness, and self-rated health: Evidence from nationwide surveys in Japan. Social Science and Medicine, 70, 1358–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Smith, D. M., Schwarz, N., Roberts, T. R., & Ubel, P. (2006). Why are you calling me? How study introductions change response patterns. Quality of Life Research, 15, 621–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Available at: http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf. Accessed 2 April 2013.
  19. Stone, A. A., Schneider, S., & Harter, J. (2012). Day-of-week mood patterns in the United States: On the existence of ‘Blue Monday’, ‘Thank God it’s Friday’ and weekend effects. Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 306–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Suh, E., Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1996). Events and subjective well-being: Only recent events matter. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 1091–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life: Ordering concepts and measures of the good life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yap, S., Anusic, I., & Lucas, R. (2012). Does personality moderate reaction and adaptation to major life events? Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 477–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aneta Bonikowska
    • 1
    Email author
  • John F. Helliwell
    • 2
    • 3
  • Feng Hou
    • 1
  • Grant Schellenberg
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Social Analysis DivisionStatistics CanadaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Canadian Institute for Advanced ResearchTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Vancouver School of EconomicsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations