Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 118, Issue 2, pp 601–615 | Cite as

Reliability and Validity of Japanese Versions of the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience

  • Katsunori Sumi
Article

Abstract

The Flourishing Scale (FS) and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) developed by Diener et al. (Soc Indic Res 97:143–156, 2010) are brief subjective measures to assess psychological flourishing and feelings. The FS provides a single score from eight items. The 12-item SPANE yields three scores: a positive score (SPANE-P), a negative score (SPANE-N), and a balance score (SPANE-B). In this study, the reliability and validity of the Japanese versions of these scales were evaluated using a sample of 520 Japanese college students. Results showed that the Japanese versions had good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha of 0.88–0.95). The proposed single-factor structure of the FS and two-factor structure of the SPANE were supported by both principal axis factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Acceptable convergent validity of both Japanese versions was shown by correlations with scores for life satisfaction, subjective happiness, optimism, pessimism, positive and negative affect, depression, anxiety, and psychological stress. Moreover, the FS scores expectedly correlated with SPANE-P, SPANE-N, and SPANE-B. The Japanese versions of the FS and SPANE had acceptable reliability and validity, similar to the properties of the original versions

Keywords

Well-being Flourishing Positive affect Negative affect Measure 

References

  1. Bowen, N. K., & Guo, S. (2011). Structural equation modeling. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradburn, A. H. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
  3. Camfield, L., & Skevington, S. M. (2008). On subjective well-being and quality of life. Journal of Health Psychology, 13(6), 764–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Church, A. T. (2010). Measurement issues in cross-cultural research. In G. Walford, E. Tucker, & M. Viswanathan (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of measurement (pp. 151–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, S., Kamarack, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, S., & Williamson, G. M. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), The social psychology of health (pp. 31–67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  9. de Vaus, D. (2002). Surveys in social research (5th ed.). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delle Fave, A., Massimini, F., & Bassi, M. (2011). Psychological selection and optimal experience across cultures: Social empowerment through personal growth. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeLogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H., & Covi, L. (1974). The Hopkins symptom checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory. Behavioral Science, 19(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Diener, E., Napa Scollon, C., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. Advances in Cell Aging and Gerontology, 15, 187–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Pavot, W. (1991). Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 119–139). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  19. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13(1), 81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). National differences in subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 434–450). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  21. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., et al. (2009). New measures of well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 247–266). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., et al. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fordyce, M. W. (1988). A review of research on the happiness measures: A sixty second index of happiness and mental health. Social Indicators Research, 20(4), 355–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2001). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gruenewald, T. L., & Seeman, T. E. (2010). Social support and physical health: Links and mechanism. In A. Steptoe, K. E. Freedland, & L. Poole (Eds.), Handbook of behavioral medicine: Methods and applications (pp. 225–236). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henson, R. K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34(3), 177–189.Google Scholar
  28. Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or VIRTUE: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 735–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Inoguchi, T., & Fujii, S. (2009). The quality of life in Japan. Social Indicators Research, 92(2), 227–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. International Wellbeing Group. (2006). Personal wellbeing index (4th Ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Australian centre on quality of life, Deakin University. http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing-index/pwi-a-english.pdf. Accessed August 10, 2013.
  31. Joshanloo, M., & Nosratabadi, M. (2009). Value priorities as predictors of hedonic and eudaimonic aspects of well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(4), 294–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kesebir, P., & Diener, E. (2008). In pursuit of happiness: Empirical answers to philosophical questions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychological Quarterly, 61(2), 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Keyes, C. L. M. (2005). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete health model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(3), 539–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Keyes, C. L. M. (2006). Subjective well-being in mental health and human development research worldwide: An introduction. Social Indicators Research, 77(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Keyes, C. L. M. (2009). Toward a science of mental health. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89–95). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Keyes, C. L. M., & Magyar-Moe, J. L. (2003). The measurement and utility of adult subjective well-being. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 411–425). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  39. Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Larsen, R. J., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1999). Measurement issues in emotion research. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 40–60). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  41. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 616–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maltby, J., Day, L., & Barber, L. (2005). Forgiveness and happiness. The differing contexts of forgiveness using the distinction between hedonic and eudaimonic happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McMahan, E. A., & Estes, D. (2011). Hedonic versus eudaimonic conceptions of well-being: Evidence of differential associations with self-reported well-being. Social Indicators Research, 103(1), 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Michalos, A. C., Sirgy, M. J., & Estes, R. J. (2006). Introducing the official journal of the international society for quality of life studies: Applied Research in Quality of Life (ARQOL). Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(1), 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Norrish, J. M., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2008). Is the study of happiness a worthy scientific pursuit? Social Indicators Research, 87(3), 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  48. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2007). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Pressman, S. D., & Cohen, S. (2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 925–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Raibley, J. R. (2011). Happiness is not well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(6), 1105–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sato, A., & Yasuda, A. (2001). [Development of the Japanese version of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) scales]. [Japanese Journal of Personality], 9(2), 138–139 [in Japanese].Google Scholar
  59. Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (2003). Self-regulatory processes and responses to health threats: Effects of optimism on well-being. In J. Suls & K. A. Wallston (Eds.), Social psychological foundations of health and illness (pp. 395–428). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1063–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schimmack, U. (2007). Methodological issues in the assessment of the affective component of subjective well-being. In A. Ong & M. H. M. van Dulman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 96–110). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  64. Shimai, S., Orake. K., Utsuki, N., Ikemi, A., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2004). [Development of a Japanese version of the Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS), and examination of its validity and reliability]. [Japanese Journal of Public Health], 51(10), 845–853 [in Japanese].Google Scholar
  65. Silva, A. J., & Caetano, A. (2011). Validation of the flourishing scale and scale of positive and negative experience in portugal. Social Indicators Research, 110(2), 469–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sirgy, M. J. (2012). The psychology of quality of life: Hedonic well-being, life satisfaction, and eudaimonia (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Steger, M. F., Kashdan, T. B., Sullivan, B. A., & Lorentz, D. (2008). Understanding the search for meaning in life: Personality, cognitive style, and the dynamic between seeking and experiencing meaning. Journal of Personality, 76(2), 199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sumi, K. (1997). Optimism, social support, stress, and physical and psychological well-being in Japanese women. Psychological Reports, 81(1), 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sumi, K. (2004). The Japanese version of the revised life orientation test: Reliability and construct validity. Psychological Reports, 95(3), 86–88.Google Scholar
  71. Sumi, K. (2007). [Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Perceived Stress Scale]. [Japanese Journal of Health Psychology], 19(2), 44–53 [in Japanese].Google Scholar
  72. Sumi, K. (2008). [Optimism, pessimism, social support, and psychological adjustment: A test of a mediation model]. [Journal of Educational and Health Science], 53(3), 119–125 [in Japanese].Google Scholar
  73. Uchida, Y., Norasakkunkit, V., & Kitayama, S. (2004). Cultural constructions of happiness: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(3), 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Veenhoven, R. (2013). World database of happiness: Archive of research findings on subjective enjoyment of life. Erasmus University Rotterdam. http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_quer/hqi_fp.htm. Accessed 10 August 2013.
  75. Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Waterman, A. S. (2007). On the importance of distinguishing hedonia and eudaimonia when contemplating the hedonic treadmill. American Psychologist, 62(6), 612–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Waterman, A. S. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: A eudaimonist’s perspective. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 234–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Ravert, R. D., Williams, M. K., Agocha, V. B., et al. (2010). The questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nagare CollegeNagoya Institute of TechnologyNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations