Social Indicators Research

, Volume 118, Issue 2, pp 919–936 | Cite as

Getting Active in the Gulf: Environmental Attitudes and Action Following Two Mississippi Coastal Disasters

  • A. Brooke Walters
  • Christopher F. Drescher
  • Brandy J. Baczwaski
  • Bethany J. Aiena
  • Marie C. Darden
  • Laura R. Johnson
  • Erin M. Buchanan
  • Stefan E. Schulenberg
Article

Abstract

The current study examined the impact of the Gulf Oil Spill and Hurricane Katrina, environmental attitudes, and environmental action among residents of the Mississippi Gulf Coast. The authors sought to determine if disaster impact, worry about the environment, or connection to nature was associated with environmental action following the oil spill and in general. We hypothesized that disaster impact and environmental attitudes would be significantly associated with environmental action. Surveys were administered to 1,108 individuals receiving mental health services in connection with the Gulf Oil Spill. Results indicated that disaster impact was correlated with environmental worry, connection to nature, and action. Additionally, environmental worry and connection to nature were significantly associated with action, as were the effects of Hurricane Katrina to a lesser degree. This study supplements the existing literature by examining environmental attitudes, disaster impact, and their association with environmental action following two disasters.

Keywords

Gulf Oil Spill Disaster impact Environmental worry Connection to nature Environmental action 

References

  1. Aiena, B. J., Baczwaski, B. J., Schulenberg, S. E., & Buchanan, E. M. (2013). Psychometric properties of the 14-Item Resilience Scale: A tale of two samples (manuscript submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  2. Arata, C. M., Picou, J. S., Johnson, G. D., & McNally, T. S. (2000). Coping with technological disaster: An application of the conservation of resources model to the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 13, 23–29. doi:10.1023/A:1007764729337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow, D. H. (2002). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  4. Benight, C. C., Ironson, G., Klebe, K., Carver, C. S., Wynings, C., Burnett, K., et al. (1999). Conservation of resources and coping self-efficacy predicting distress following a natural disaster: A causal model analysis where the environment meets the mind. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 12, 107–126. doi:10.1080/10615809908248325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Böhm, G., & Pfister, H. (2000). Action tendencies and characteristics of environmental risks. Acta Psychologica, 104, 317–337. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00035-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boscarino, J. A., Adams, R. E., & Figley, C. R. (2004). Mental health service use 1-year after the World Trade Center disaster: Implications for mental healthcare. General Hospital Psychiatry, 26, 346–358. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2004.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bragg, E. A. (1996). Towards ecological self: Deep ecology meets constructionist self-theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 93–108. doi:10.1006/jevp.1996.0008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carrico, A. R., & Riemer, M. (2011). Motivating energy conservation in the workplace: An evaluation of the use of group-level feedback and peer education. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.11.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Center for Biological Diversity. (2011). A deadly toll: The Gulf Oil Spill and the unfolding wildlife disaster. Retrieved from http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/public_lands/energy/dirty_energy_development/oil_and_gas/gulf_oil_spill/a_deadly_toll.html.
  10. Chawla, L., & Cushing, D. F. (2007). Education for strategic environmental behavior. Environmental Education Research, 13, 437–452. doi:10.1080/13504620701581539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke, K. C., & Hemphill, J. J. (2002). The Santa Barbara Oil Spill: A retrospective. In D. Danta (Ed.), Yearbook of the Association of Pacific Coast Geographers (pp. 157–162). Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Der-Karabetian, A., Stephenson, K., & Poggi, T. (1996). Environmental risk perception, activism, and world-mindedness among samples of British and U.S. college students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 451–462. doi:10.2466/pms.1996.83.2.451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dermansky, J. (2013). Three years after the BP Spill, tar balls and oil sheen blight the Gulf Coast. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/04/three-years-after-the-bp-spill-tar-balls-and-oil-sheen-blight-gulf-coast/275139/.
  16. DeVellis, R. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Drescher, C. F., Baczwaski, B. J., Walters, A. B., Aiena, B. J., Schulenberg, S. E., & Johnson, L. R. (2012). Coping with an ecological disaster: The role of perceived meaning in life and self-efficacy following the Gulf Oil Spill. Ecopsychology, 4, 56–63. doi:10.1089/eco.2012.0009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Drescher, C. F., Schulenberg, S. E., & Smith, C. V. (in press). The deepwater horizon oil spill and the Mississippi Gulf Coast: Mental health in the context of a technological disaster. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry.Google Scholar
  19. Duffy, S., & Verges, M. (2010). Forces of nature affect implicit connections with nature. Environment and Behavior, 42, 723–739. doi:10.1177/0013916509338552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dyson, M. E. (2006). Come Hell or high water: Hurricane Katrina and the color of disaster. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  21. Finger, M. (1994). From knowledge to action? Exploring the relationships between environmental experiences, learning, and behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 141–160. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02424.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fisher, A. (2002). Radical ecopsychology: Psychology in the service of life. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  23. Freedy, J. R., Saladin, M. E., Kilpatrick, D. G., Resnick, H. S., & Saunders, B. E. (1994). Understanding acute psychological distress following natural disaster. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 7, 257–273. doi:10.1007/BF02102947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Freudenburg, W. R., & Gramling, R. (2011). Blowout in the Gulf: The BP oil spill disaster and the future of energy in America. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
  25. Fullilove, M. T. (1996). Psychiatric implications of displacement: Contributions from the psychology of place. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 1516–1523.Google Scholar
  26. Grattan, L. M., Roberts, S., Mahan, W. T., Jr., McLaughlin, P. K., Otwell, W. S., & Morris, J. G., Jr. (2011). The early psychological impacts of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill on Florida and Alabama communities. Environmental Health Perspectives, 119, 838–843. doi:10.1289/ehp.1002915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Green, B. (1994). Psychosocial research in traumatic stress: An update. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 7, 341–362. doi:10.1002/jts.2490070303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guiney, M. S., & Oberhauser, K. S. (2009). Conservation volunteers’ connection to nature. Ecopsychology, 1, 187–197. doi:10.1089/eco.2009.0030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hamblen, J. L., Barnett, E., & Norris, F. H. (2012). Long-term mental health treatment for adult disaster survivors. In J. L. Framingham & M. L. Teasley (Eds.), Behavioral health response to disasters (pp. 301–318). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Helmer, M., & Hilhorst, D. (2006). Natural disasters and climate change. Disasters, 30, 1–4. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00302.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hirschel, M. J., & Schulenberg, S. E. (2009). Hurricane Katrina’s impact on the Mississippi Gulf Coast: General self-efficacy’s relationship to PTSD prevalence and severity. Psychological Services, 6, 293–303. doi:10.1037/a0017467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 8–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koger, S. (2010). Coping with the Deepwater Horizon disaster: An Ecopsychology interview with Deborah Du Nann Winter. Ecopsychology, 2, 205–209. doi:10.1089/eco.2010.0059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Koger, S. M., & Winter, D. D. N. (2010). The psychology of environmental problems: Psychology for sustainability (3rd ed.). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kulik, L. (2006). Burnout among volunteers in the social services: The impact of gender and employment status. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 541–561. doi:10.1002/jcop.20114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Larson, M. E., Houlihan, D., & Goernert, D. (1995). Effects of informational feedback on aluminum recycling. Behavioral Interventions, 10, 111–117. doi:10.1002/bin.2360100207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee, E. O., Shen, C., & Tran, T. V. (2009). Coping with Hurricane Katrina: Psychological distress and resilience among African American evacuees. Journal of Black Psychology, 35, 5–23. doi:10.1177/0095798410364394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ludwig, T. D., Gray, T. W., & Rowell, A. (1998). Increasing recycling in academic buildings: A systematic replication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 683–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maiteny, P. T. (2002). Mind in the gap: Summary of research exploring ‘inner’ influences on pro-sustainability learning and behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 8, 299–306. doi:10.1080/13504620220145447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martinez-Martin, P. (2010). Composite rating scales. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 289, 7–11. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2009.08.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 16, 95–100. doi:10.1080/00201747308601682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. (2012, December 3). Gulf Oil Spill response efforts. Retrieved from http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/programs/gulfspill/.
  44. Nigbur, D., Lyons, E., & Uzzell, D. (2010). Attitudes, norms, identity, and environmental behaviour: Using an expanded theory of planned behaviour to predict participation in kerbside recycling programme. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 259–284. doi:10.1348/014466609X449395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The Nature Relatedness Scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715–740. doi:10.1177/0013916508318748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ojala, M. (2005). Adolescents’ worries about environmental risks: Subjective well-being, values, and existential dimensions. Journal of Youth Studies, 8, 331–347. doi:10.1080/13676260500261934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ojala, M. (2008). Recycling and ambivalence: Quantitative and qualitative analyses of household recycling among young adults. Environment and Behavior, 40, 777–797. doi:10.1177/0013916507308787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pienaar, M. (2011). An eco-existential understanding of time and psychological defenses: Threats to the environment and implications for psychotherapy. Ecopsychology, 3, 25–39. doi:10.1089/eco.2010.0058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rodriguez, J. J., & Kohn, R. (2008). Use of mental health services among disaster survivors. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 21, 370–378. doi:10.1097/YCO.0b013e328304d984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roszak, T., Gomes, M. E., & Kanner, A. D. (Eds.). (1995). Ecopsychology: Restoring the earth, healing the mind. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
  51. Rotolo, T., & Wilson, J. (2007). The effects of children and employment status on the volunteer work of American women. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 487–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rubonis, A. V., & Bickman, L. (1991). Psychological impairment in the wake of disaster: The disaster-psychopathology relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 384–399. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.3.384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sabucedo, J. M., Arce, C., Ferraces, M. J., Merino, H., & Duran, M. (2009). Psychological impact of the Prestige catastrophe. International Journal of Clinical Health Psychology, 9, 105–116.Google Scholar
  54. Sams, C. (2010, April 30). The Gulf Coast Oil Spill: How to help. Take Part. Retrieved from http://www.takepart.com/article/2010/04/30/gulf-coast-oil-spill-how-help.
  55. Santucci, P. (2012). Mental health outcomes of disasters and terrorism. In J. L. Framingham & M. L. Teasley (Eds.), Behavioral health response to disasters (pp. 115–140). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schmuck, P., & Vlek, C. (2003). Psychologists can do much to support sustainable development. European Psychologist, 8, 66–76. doi:10.1027//1016-9040.8.2.66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schulenberg, S. E., Drescher, C. F., & Baczwaski, B. J. (2013). Perceived meaning and disaster mental health: A role for logotherapy in clinical-disaster psychology. In A. Batthyany & P. Russo-Netzer (Eds.), Meaning in positive and existential psychology . Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  58. Schultz, P. W. (2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 391–406. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327–339. doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: Understanding the psychology of human-nature interactions. In P. Schmuck & P. W. Schultz (Eds.), The psychology of sustainable development (pp. 61–78). Boston, MA: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schultz, P. W., Shriver, C., Tabanico, J. J., & Khazian, A. M. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 31–42. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schultz, P. W., & Tabanico, J. (2007). Self, identity, and the natural environment: Exploring implicit connections with nature. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1219–1247. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00210.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sia, A. P., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1985). Selected predictors of responsible environmental behavior: An analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 17, 31–40. doi:10.1080/00958964.1986.9941408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Steger, M. F., Frazier, P. A., & Zacchanini, J. L. (2008). Terrorism in two cultures: Stress and growth following September 11 and the Madrid train bombings. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 13, 511–527. doi:10.1080/15325020802173660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stuber, J., Galea, S., Boscarino, J. A., & Schlesinger, M. (2006). Was there unmet mental health need after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks? Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 41, 230–240. doi:10.1007/s00127-005-0022-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sun Herald Editorial. (2005, December 14). Mississippi’s invisible coast. Sun Herald. Retrieved from http://www.sunherald.com/2005/12/14/2416342/mississippis-invisible-coast.html.
  68. Taniguchi, H. (2006). Men’s and women’s volunteering: Gender differences in the effects of employment and family characteristics. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance. Coverage in the United States Current Population Reports, 60-238. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/income_expenditures_poverty_wealth/household_income.html.
  70. van der Velden, P. G., Yzermans, C. G., Kleber, R. J., & Gersons, B. P. (2007). Correlates of mental health service utilization 18 months and almost 4 years postdisaster among adults with mental health problems. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 20, 1029–1039. doi:10.1002/jts.20273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wang, P. S., Gruber, M. J., Powers, R. E., Schoenbaum, M., Speier, A. H., Wells, K. B., et al. (2007). Mental health service use among hurricane Katrina survivors in the eight months after the disaster. Psychiatric Services, 58, 1403–1411. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.58.11.1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Werner, C. M., & Makela, E. (1998). Motivations and behavior that support recycling. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 373–386. doi:10.1006/jevp.1998.0114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zakour, M. J. (2012). Coping with loss and overcoming trauma. In J. L. Framingham & M. L. Teasley (Eds.), Behavioral health response to disasters (pp. 91–113). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Brooke Walters
    • 1
  • Christopher F. Drescher
    • 1
  • Brandy J. Baczwaski
    • 1
  • Bethany J. Aiena
    • 1
  • Marie C. Darden
    • 1
  • Laura R. Johnson
    • 1
  • Erin M. Buchanan
    • 3
  • Stefan E. Schulenberg
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe University of MississippiUniversityUSA
  2. 2.University of Mississippi Clinical-Disaster Research Center (UM-CDRC)UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyMissouri State UniversitySpringfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations