The Index of Household Financial Condition, Combining Subjective and Objective Indicators: An Appraisal of Italian Households
With data from the Italian Survey of Household Income and Wealth, we present an Index of Household Financial Condition and quantify with it the position of households between 2004 and 2010. The Index of Household Financial Condition is composed of subjective and objective indicators, which enable to capture differently the existing uncertainty concerning the future development of a household’s financial situation. We show with a measurement model based on multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) that the proposed Index is two-dimensional and comprises financial position and financial prudence. Through application of the MGCFA, we show that the interrelations between the indicators had not changed at four measurement occasions (2004–2010), and thus the proposed set comprises a coherent and time-invariant framework for measuring two dimensions of the latent concept: financial condition. Established measurement invariance in the MGCFA framework allows an assessment of trend in financial position and financial prudence of Italian households. We show that the financial position of Italian households improved in the period 2004–2006 and later declined. Improvement of the financial prudence was observed, however, till 2008. Finally, we incorporate a set of socioeconomic features of Italian households into a structural equation model. With the provided set of indicators, we find positive relation between age and both financial position and prudence, but also we show the positive impact of white-collar jobs on scores in each of the dimensions of the financial condition.
KeywordsFinancial situation Households Index Measurement invariance Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis
- Anderloni, L., & Vandone, D. (2010). Risk of overindebtedness and behavioural factors. Working papers, Vol. 21501, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
- Atkinson, A., McKay, S., Kempson, E., & Collard, S. (2006). Levels of financial capability in the UK: Results of a baseline survey. Consumer Research, 46, 1–150. Retrieved from http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/consumer-research/crpr47.pdf.
- Banca d’Italia. (2011). Supplements to the statistical Bulletin. Monetary and Financial Indicators. Household Wealth in Italy 2010. New series year XXII—14 December 2011, Vol. 64, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
- Banca d’Italia. (2012). Supplements to the statistical Bulletin. Sample Survey. Household Income and Wealth in 2010. New series: Year XXII—25 January 2012, Vol. 6, pp. 1–144.Google Scholar
- Banco de España. (2011). Survey of household finances (EFF) 2008: Methods, results and changes since 2005. Economic Bulletin, 91–123.Google Scholar
- Betti, G., Dourmashkin, N., Rossi, M., Verma, V., & Yin, Y. (2001). Study of the problem of consumer indebtedness: Statistical aspects final report. London: ORC Macro.Google Scholar
- Brunetti, M., Giarda, E., & Torricelli, C. (2012). Is financial fragility a matter of illiquidity? An appraisal for Italian households. CEFIN working papers, Vol. 32, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
- Byrne, B. M. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: a walk through the process. Psicothema, 20(4), 872–882. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18940097.
- Carroll, C. D., & Toche, P. (2009). A tractable model of buffer stock saving. NBER working paper no. 15265.Google Scholar
- Cobb-Clark, D. A., & Ribar, D. C. (2009). Financial stress, family conflict, and youths’ successful transition to adult roles. IZA discussion paper, Vol. 4618, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar
- Davidov, E. (2008). A cross-country and cross-time comparison of the human values measurements with the Second Round of the European Social Survey. Survey Research Methods, 2(1), 33–46.Google Scholar
- Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Billiet, J., & Schmidt, P. (2008). Values and support for immigration: A cross-country comparison. European Sociological Review, 1–17. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcn020.
- Dey, S., Djoudad, R., & Terajima, Y. (2008). A tool for assessing financial vulnerabilities in the household sector. Bank of Canada Review, (Summer 2008), 45–54.Google Scholar
- Disney, R., Bridges, S., & Gathergood, J. (2008). Drivers of over-indebtedness. Report to the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, (October), pp. 1–87.Google Scholar
- Esty, D. C., Levy, M. A., Kim, C., De Sherbinin, A., Srebotnjak, T., & Mara, V. (2008). Environmental performance index. New Haven.Google Scholar
- Frigge, M., Hoaglin, D. C., & Iglewicz, B. (1989). Some Implementations of the Boxplot. The American Statistician, 43(1), 50–54.Google Scholar
- Fuenzalida, M., & Ruiz-Tagle, J. (2010). Household financial vulnerability. In R. A. Alfaro (Ed.), Financial stability, monetary policy, and central banking (pp. 299–326). Central Bank of Chile.Google Scholar
- Georgarakos, D., Lojschova, A., & Ward-Warmedinger, M. (2010). Mortgage, indebtedness and household financial distress. Working paper series, Vol. 1156, pp. 1–59.Google Scholar
- Giarda, E. (2010). Persistency of financial distress amongst Italian households: Evidence from dynamic probit models.Google Scholar
- Gomez-Salvador, R., Lojschova, A., & Westermann, T. (2011). Household sector borrowing in the Euro Area. A microdata perspective. Occasional paper series, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
- Jansen, R. (2011). Using differential item functioning approach to investigate measurement invariance. In E. Davidov, P. Schmidt, & J. Billiet (Eds.), Cross-cultural analysis: Methods and applications (pp. 415–432). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
- Jappelli, T., & Padula, M. (2007). Households’ saving and debt in Italy.Google Scholar
- Jappelli, T., Pagano, M., & Di Maggio, M. (2008). Households’ indebtedness and financial fragility. 9th Jacques Polak annual research conference (pp. 1–43). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Katona, G. (1946). Psychological analysis of business decisions and expectations. American Economic Review, 36(1), 44–62.Google Scholar
- Lusardi, A., Schneider, D., & Tufano, P. (2011). Financially fragile households: Evidence and implications. Brookings papers on economic activity (Vol. 42, pp. 1–48). doi: 10.1353/eca.2011.0002.
- May, O., & Tudela, M. (2005). When is mortgage indebtedness a financial burden to British households? A dynamic probit approach. The Bank of England working paper, Vol. 277, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar
- McCarthy, Y. (2011). Behavioural characteristics and financial distress. Working paper series, Vol. 1303, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed., pp. 1–856). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen&Muthen.Google Scholar
- Osberg, L. (Ed.). (1991). Economic inequality and poverty: international perspectives. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe Publishers.Google Scholar
- Osborne, J. W. (2010). Improving your data transformations: Applying the Box-Cox transformation. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 15(12).Google Scholar
- Saisana, M. (2010). ELLI-Index: A sound measure for lifelong learning in the EU. doi: 10.2788/145.
- Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2011). Capturing bias in structural equation modeling. In E. Davidov, P. Schmidt, & J. Billet (Eds.), Cross-cultural analysis. Methods and applications (pp. 3–34). New York, London: Routledge, Taylor&Francis Group.Google Scholar
- Wu, A. D., Li, Z., & Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis: A demonstration with TIMSS data. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 12(3), 1–26. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v12n3.pdf.