Social Indicators Research

, Volume 117, Issue 3, pp 673–688 | Cite as

Is the Easy Life Always the Happiest? Examining the Association of Convenience and Well-Being in Taiwan

  • Chun-Hao Li
  • Ming-Chang TsaiEmail author


Social scientists have under-examined neighborhood stores and other “resources” and their relationships to community welfare and personal happiness. Because the presence of neighborhood conveniences may signify that a neighborhood caters to residents’ needs and smoothes out the hassles of their daily lives, it could be hypothesized that commercial amenities and services enhance individuals’ satisfaction with their neighborhoods, with their health, and even with their lives as a whole. This study used a national probability sample from Taiwan, a densely populated society in East Asia, to test if service-oriented commercial and religious enterprises in neighborhoods are associated with positive estimations of well-being by those who occupy these spaces. We empirically examine whether proximity to main roads, night markets and temples or proximity to smoky food stands and other shops that produce pungent products affects well-being. Our findings from multivariate analyses suggest that if nearby conveniences are conceived as annoyances, they tend to lower satisfaction with neighborhood, but they do not lower life satisfaction in general. In contrast, air quality, along with “peace and quietness” is reported by respondents to be key in enhancing general well-being. We discuss the policy implications in the concluding session.


City Housing Neighborhood Residential satisfaction Happiness 



The authors would like to thank Professor Po-Keung Ip and two anonymous reviewers for their invaluable comments for the earlier versions of this article. Any errors remain our responsibility.


  1. Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (1997). Statistical methods for the social sciences. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Aickin, M., & Gensler, H. (1996). Adjusting for multiple testing when reporting research results: The Bonferroni vs Holm methods. American Journal of Public Health, 86(5), 726–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amérigo, M., & Aragonés, J. I. (1997). A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(1), 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barcus, H. R. (2004). Urban-rural migration in the USA: An analysis of residential satisfaction. Regional Studies, 38(6), 643–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brereton, F., Clinch, J. P., & Ferreira, S. (2008). Happiness, geography and the environment. Ecological Economics, 65(2), 386–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, A., Converse, P., & Rodgers, W. (1976). The Quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Chang, W.-C. (2013). Family ties, living arrangement, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, W.-C. (2012). How education enhances happiness: Comparison of mediating factors in four East Asian countries. Social Indicators Research, 106(1), 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans, G. W., & Cohen, S. (1991). Environmental stress. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 571–610). Malabar, FL: Krieger.Google Scholar
  13. Fang, Y. (2006). Residential satisfaction, moving intention and moving behaviours: A study of redeveloped neighbourhoods in inner-city Beijing. Housing and Society, 21(5), 671–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fassio, O., Rollero, C., & De Piccoli, N. (2013). Health, quality of life and population density: A preliminary study on “contextualized” quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 110(2), 479–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Gowdy, J. M. (2007). Environmental degradation and happiness? Ecological Economics, 60(3), 509–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Galea, S., Freudenberg, N., & Vlahov, D. (2005). Cities and population health. Social Science and Medicine, 60(5), 1017–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Galster, G. C. (1987). Identifying the correlates of dwelling satisfaction: An empirical critique. Environment and Behavior, 19(5), 537–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glaster, G. C., & Hesser, G. W. (1981). Residential satisfaction: Compositional and contextual correlates. Environment and Behavior, 13(6), 735–758.Google Scholar
  19. Glaeser, E. L., & Gottlieb, J. D. (2006). Urban resurgence and the consumer city. Urban Studies, 43(8), 1275–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ha, M., & Weber, M. J. (1991). The determinants of residential environmental qualities and satisfaction: Effects of financing, housing programs and housing regulations. Housing and Society, 18(3), 65–76.Google Scholar
  21. Helburn, N. (1982). Geography and the quality of life. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 72(4), 445–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ibem, E. O., & Amole, D. (2012). Residential satisfaction in public core housing in Abeokuta, Ogun state, Nigeria. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0111-z.
  23. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  24. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kroesen, M., Molin, E. J. E., Miedema, H. M. E., Vos, H., Janssen, S. A., & van Wee, B. (2010). Estimation of the effects of aircraft noise on residential satisfaction. Transportation research part D: Transport and environment, 15(3), 144–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, Y.-J. (2008). Subjective quality of life measurement in Taipei. Building and Environment, 43(7), 1205–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, B. A., & Guest, A. M. (1983). Determinants of neighborhood satisfaction: A metropolitan-level analysis. The Sociological Quarterly, 24(2), 287–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MacKerron, G., & Mourato, S. (2009). Life satisfaction and air quality in London. Ecological Economics, 68(5), 1441–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marmot, M. (2002). The influence of income on health: Views of an epidemiologist. Health Affairs, 21(2), 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moser, G., & Robin, M. (2006). Environmental annoyances: An urban-specific threat to quality of life? European Reviews of Applied Psychology, 56(1), 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nooraie, H., & Tabibian, M. (2012). Quality of life in the decayed historic areas of isfahan (DHI) using the world health organization quality of life instrument (WHOQOL-BREF). Applied Research in Quality of Life, 7(4), 371–390.Google Scholar
  32. Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being: A social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1–2), 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parkes, A., Kearns, A., & Atkinson, R. (2002). What makes people dissatisfied with their neighbourhoods? Urban Studies, 39(13), 2413–2438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Perneger, T. V. (1998). What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments? British Medical Journal, 316(7139), 1236–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rehdanz, K., & Maddison, D. (2008). Local environmental quality and life-satisfaction in Germany. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 787–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rogerson, R. J. (1999). Quality of life and city competitiveness. Urban Studies, 36(5–6), 969–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sirgy, M. J., Gao, T., & Young, R. F. (2008). How does residents’ satisfaction with community service influence quality of life (QOL) outcomes? Applied Research in Quality of Life, 3(2), 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sirgy, M. J., Rahtz, D. R., Cicic, M., & Underwood, R. (2000). A method for assessing residents’ satisfaction with community-based services: A quality-of-life perspective. Social Indicators Research, 49(3), 279–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, T. W., Kin, J., Koch, A., & Park, A. (2006). Social-science research and the general social surveys. Comparative Sociology, 5(1), 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smyth, R., Mishra, V., & Qian, X. (2008). The environment and well-being in urban China. Ecological Economics, 68(1–2), 547–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Spain, D. (1988). The effect of changing household composition on neighborhood satisfaction. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 23(4), 581–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tsai, M.-C. (2011). ‘Foreign Brides’ meet ethnic politics in Taiwan. International Migration Review, 45(2), 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Uzzell, D. L., & Moser, G. (2006). Environment and quality of life. European Reviews of Applied Psychology, 56(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
  44. Van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., & de Hollander, A. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being: Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1–2), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Veenhoven, R. (2007). Subjective measures of well-being. In M. McGillivray (Ed.), Human well-being: Concept and measurement (pp. 214–239). Houndsmill, UK: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
  46. Walton, D., Murray, S. J., & Thomas, J. A. (2008). Relationships between population density and the perceived quality of neighborhood. Social Indicators Research, 89, 405–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Welsch, H. (2006). Environment and happiness: Valuation of air pollution using life satisfaction data. Ecological Economics, 58(4), 801–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Welsch, H. (2007). Environmental welfare analysis: A life satisfaction approach. Ecological Economics, 62(3–4), 544–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Whyte, W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. New York: Conservation Foundation.Google Scholar
  50. Whyte, W. H. (1988a). City: Rediscovering the center. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  51. Whyte, W. H. (1988b). Central cities’ value for business. National Civic Review, 77(1), 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Widgery, R. N. (1992). Neighborhood quality of life: A subjective matter? In M. Joseph Sirgy, H. Lee Meadow, Don. R. Rahtz, & A. C. Samli (Eds.), Developments in quality-of-life studies in marketing (pp. 112–114). Blacksburg, VA: Academy of Marketing Science.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social and Policy SciencesYuan Ze UniversityJungli City, Taoyuan CountyTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of SociologyNational Taipei UniversityNew Taipei CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations