Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 114, Issue 1, pp 121–137 | Cite as

Minimising Misery: A New Strategy for Public Policies Instead of Maximising Happiness?

  • Orsolya LelkesEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper raises the issue whether public policy should focus on minimizing unhappiness rather than maximizing happiness. Using a cross-sectional multi-country dataset with 57,000 observations from 29 European countries, we show that unhappiness varies a great deal more across social groups than (high levels of) happiness does. Our findings are robust to several alternative specifications, using both self-reported life satisfaction and self-reported happiness, and different cut-off points for defining unhappiness (dissatisfaction) and high levels of happiness (satisfaction). While misery appears to strongly relate to broad social issues (such as unemployment, poverty, social isolation), bliss might be more of a private matter, with individual strategies and attitudes, hidden from the eye of a policy-maker. The social cost of unhappiness may be also reflected in the immense cost of mental health problems. Preventing avoidable unhappiness, however, needs to be complemented with other strategies for promoting happiness, perhaps on a more decentralized level, given the different causes of bliss and that of misery.

Keywords

Happiness Unhappiness Life satisfaction Public policy Bipolar scales 

References

  1. Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Clark, A. E., Diener, E., Georgellis, Y., & Lucas, R. (2008). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. Economic Journal, 118(529), F222–F243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. The Economic Journal, 104(424), 648–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1996). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  6. Cummins, R. (2012). Unipolar response scale: A suggested change for the PWI. Paper presented at the ISQOLS conference, Venice, 3 Nov 2012.Google Scholar
  7. Davidson, R. J. (1992). Anterior cerebral asymmetry and the nature of emotion. Brain and Cognition, 20(1), 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Wissing, M. P. (2012). The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research, 100(2), 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delle Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (2005). The relevance of subjective well-being to social policies: Optimal experience and tailored intervention. In F. A. Huppert, N. Baylis, & B. Keverne (Eds.), The science of well-being (pp. 379–404). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  10. Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1985). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1105–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). The theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497–527.Google Scholar
  12. Diener, E., & Iran-Nejad, A. (1986). The relationship in experience between various types of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1031–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Maximising happiness? German Economic Review, 1(2), 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gallie, D., & Russell, H. (1998). Unemployment and life satisfaction: A cross-cultural comparison. European Journal of Sociology, 39(2), 248–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoebel, B. G., Rada, P. V., Mark, G. P., & Pothos, E. N. (1999). Neural systems for reinforcement and inhibition of behavior: Relevance to eating, addiction, and depression. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 558–572). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  17. Layard, R. (2012). Mental health: The new frontier for the Welfare State. CEP@21 lecture, 6 Mar 2012.Google Scholar
  18. Lelkes, O. (2006). Knowing what is good for you. Empirical analysis of personal preferences and the “objective good”. Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2. Special Issue: The Socio-Economics of Happiness), 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lepper, H. S. (1998). Use of other-reports to validate subjective well-being measures. Social Indicators Research, 44(3), 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Loewenstein, G., & Adler, D. (1995). A bias in the prediction of tastes. The Economic Journal, 105(July), 929–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Projection bias in predicting future utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1209–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Loewenstein, G., & Schkade, D. (1999). Wouldn’t it be nice? Predicting future feelings. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundation of hedonic psychology (pp. 85–105). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). The how of happiness: A scientific approach to getting the life you want. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  24. Noll, H. -H., & Weick, S. (2010). Subjective well-being in Germany: Evolutions, determinants and policy implications. In B. Greve (Ed.), Happiness and social policy in europe (pp. 70–88). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  25. OECD. (2011). Mental health and work: Evidence, challenges and policy directions. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  26. Olson, G. I., & Schober, B. I. (1993). The satisfied poor. Social Indicators Research, 28, 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being. The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  28. Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  29. Seligman, M. E. P. (1991). Learned optimism: How to change your mind and your life. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  30. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. Van Praag, B. M. S., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2004). Happiness quantified: A satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Whelan, C. T., & McGinnity, F. (2000). Unemployment and satisfaction: A European analysis. In S. Paugam & D. Gallie (Eds.), Welfare regimes and the experience of unemployment in Europe (pp. 286–306). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Winkelmann, L., & Winkelmann, R. (1998). Why are the unemployed so unhappy? Evidence from panel data. Economica, 65, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and ResearchViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations