Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 114, Issue 1, pp 105–120 | Cite as

Can Governments Boost People’s Sense of Well-Being? The Impact of Selected Labour Market and Health Policies on Life Satisfaction

  • Romina BoariniEmail author
  • Margherita Comola
  • Femke de Keulenaer
  • Robert Manchin
  • Conal Smith
Article

Abstract

There is strong evidence that subjective well-being measures capture in a reliable way specific components of well-being that other non-subjective measures miss. The question of whether subjective well-being is policy amenable is however still largely unexplored in the research. This paper sheds some light on this issue, by looking at the impact of selected labour market and health policies on subjective well-being, using well-being data from the Gallup World Poll on the 34 OECD countries. The paper finds that the generosity of unemployment benefits and the strictness employment protection legislation affects positively life satisfaction, while out-of-pocket health expenses significantly reduce subjective well-being.

Keywords

Happiness Life satisfaction Labour market policy Health policy Subjective well-being 

References

  1. Boarini, R., Comola, M., Smith, C., Manchin R., & De Keulenaer, F. (2012). What makes for a better life? The determinants of subjective well-being in OECD countries: evidence from the Gallup world poll. OECD Statistics Directorate Working Paper 47.Google Scholar
  2. Carinna, G., Evans, D., Ravindal, F., & Xua, K. (2009). Assessing the reliability of household expenditure data: Results of the World Health Survey. Health Policy, 91, 297–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chapple, S., & D’Addio, A. (2013). Social policy reforms and their impact on subjective well-being. Unpublished.Google Scholar
  4. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R., & Oswald, A. (2003). The Macroeconomics of happiness. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 809–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diener, E., Scollon, C. K. N., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Suh, E. M. (2000). Positivity and the construction of life satisfaction judgements, global happiness is not the sum of its parts. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diener, E., & Tov, W. (2012). National accounts of well-being. Handbook on social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 137–157). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dolan, P., & Metcalfe, R. (2008). Comparing willingness-to-pay and subjective well-being in the context of non-market goods. CEP Discussion paper No 890. London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  8. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dolan, P., & White, M. P. (2007). How can measures of subjective well-being be used to inform public policy? Perspectives on Psychological Science vol, 2(1), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2004). Global judgements of subjective well-being: Situational variability and long-term stability. Social Indicators Research, 65, 245–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal, 114, 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fleche, S., Smith, C., & Sorsa, P. (2011). Exploring determinants of subjective well-being in OECD countries: Evidence from the World Values Survey. OECD Statistics Directorate Working Paper 46. Google Scholar
  13. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110, 918–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2005). Happiness research: State and prospects. Review of Social Economy, 63(2), 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greve, B. (ed). (2010). Happiness and Social Policy in Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Harmatz, M. G., Well, A. D., Overtree, C. E., Kawamura, K. Y., Rosal, M., & Ockene, I. S. (2000). Seasonal variation of depression and other mood: A longitudinal approach. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 15(4), 344–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Helliwell, J. F. (2008). Life satisfaction and the quality of development. NBER Working Paper No 14507, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  18. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 19–20.Google Scholar
  19. Kroh, M. (2006). An experimental evaluation of popular well-being measures. German Institute for Economic Research Discussion Paper 546. January 2006, Berlin.Google Scholar
  20. Krueger, A. B., & Schkade, D. A. (2008). The reliability of subjective well-being measures. Journal of Public Economics, 92(8–9), 1833–1845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lucas, R. (2007). Long-term disability is associated with lasting changes in subjective well-being: Evidence from two nationally representative longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 717–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lucas, R. E., & Lawless, N. M. (2011). Predictors of regional well-being: A county-level analysis. Social Indicators Research, 101, 341–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ochsen, C., & Welsch, H. (2012). Who benefits from labor market institutions? Evidence from surveys of life satisfaction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(1), 112–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. OECD. (2011). Benefits and wages: Statistics, directorate for employment, labour, and social affairs. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  25. OECD. (2013). OECD guidelines for the measurement of subjective well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Rässler, S., & Riphahn, R. T. (2006). Survey item nonresponse and its treatment. Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv, 90, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Romina Boarini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Margherita Comola
    • 2
  • Femke de Keulenaer
    • 3
  • Robert Manchin
    • 3
  • Conal Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.OECDParisFrance
  2. 2.Maison des Sciences ÉconomiquesUniversité Paris 1 Panthéon-SorbonneParisFrance
  3. 3.Gallup EuropeBruxellesBelgium

Personalised recommendations