Social Indicators Research

, Volume 117, Issue 3, pp 939–965 | Cite as

Society’s (Virtually) Time-Free Transition into the Digital Age



Three early studies of the impact of IT on American society suggested that it was having a negative impact on social life, as well as mass media use. This article reviews the results from two large multiyear US national surveys that have been monitoring social change in US daily life with high response rates: (1) the 1974–2012 General Social Survey (GSS; with more than 55,000 adult respondents aged 18+) and (2) the 2003–2011 American Time-Use Survey (ATUS; with more than 100,000 such respondents). The GSS has collected time-estimate data on particular social and media activities, while the ATUS surveys have collected complete 24-h diary accounts across a single day. Our analysis is conducted on two levels to determine whether various social/media activities have changed (1) at the aggregate societal level as new IT have diffused over the last 20 years and (2) among individuals who use these new media more. In both surveys, there seems little if any significant impact of these new media on social/media time, even though they had become the predominant source of information and social contact by 2004. GSS respondents in general have not reported lower levels of social or media contact since the 1990s, and while those GSS respondents who spent more time on the Internet did report fewer social visits with relatives, they reported more visits with friends, compared to those who do not use the Internet. The main difference between users and nonusers in the ATUS was with time at paid work, and that was only partially explained by higher Internet use by teens and on days off from work. For reading and certain other behaviors, Internet use was sometimes associated with increased use in these surveys. Moreover, no consistent decline in either social or media activities was found in either survey across this period of Internet diffusion, much in line with the earlier national studies. At the same time, it seems clear that not only the ATUS but diary studies in other countries are failing to capture the significant social impact of IT on the rest of life in the new digital age.


Internet Social change Media effects IT Time use 


  1. Andrews, F., Morgan, J., & Sonquist, J. (1973). Multiple classification analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  2. Bogart, L. (1956). The age of television: A study of viewing habits and the impact of television on American life. New York: Unger.Google Scholar
  3. Coffin, T. (1954). Television’s impact on society. American Psychologist, 10, 630–641.Google Scholar
  4. Cole, J., Suman, J., Schramm, P., Lunn, R., Coget, J., et al. (2001). The UCLA Internet report 2001. Surveying the digital future. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, Center for Communication Policy.Google Scholar
  5. Gershuny, J. (2003). Web-use and net-nerds: A neo-functionalist analysis of the impact of information technology in the home. Social Forces, 82(1), 141–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Holmes, M., & Bloxham, M. (2009). An observational method for time use research: Lessons learned from the Middletown Media Studies. Social Indicators Research, 93, 245–248.Google Scholar
  7. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox. American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Marsden, P. (Ed.). (2012). Social trends in American life. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. McQuail, D. (1994). McQuail’s mass communication theory (4th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Nie, N. H., & Erbring, L. (2000). Internet and society: A preliminary report. IT and Society, 1(1), 275–283.Google Scholar
  11. Nie, N., & Hillygus, D. (2002). Where does Internet time come from? IT & Society, 2, 1–20.Google Scholar
  12. Nielsen/NetRatings. (1999). TV viewing in Internet households. A report by Nielsen Media Research. Retrieved from http://www.n Nielsen/NetRatings. Retrieved from
  13. Robinson, J. P. (1972). Television’s impact on everyday life: Some cross-national evidence. In E. Rubinstein, G. Comstock, & J. Murray (Eds.), Television and social behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 410–431). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  14. Robinson, J. P., Barth, K., & Kohut, A. (1997). Personal computers, mass media, and use of time. Social Science Computer Review, 15, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Robinson, J., & De Haan, J. (2006). Information technology and family time displacement. In R. Kraut, M. Brynan, & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Computers, phones and the internet (pp. 51–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Robinson, J. P., & Godbey, G. (1999). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Robinson, J. P., & Kestnbaum, M. (1999). The personal computer, culture and other uses of free time. Social Science Computer Review, 17(2), 209–216.Google Scholar
  18. Robinson, J. P., Kestnbaum, M., Neustadtl, A., & Alvarez, A. (2000). Mass media use and social life among Internet users. Social Science Computer Review, 18(4), 490–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Robinson, J., & Martin, S. (2009). IT and activity displacement: Behavioral evidence from the US General Social Survey (GSS). Social Indicators Research, 91(2), 115–139.Google Scholar
  20. Schramm, W. L., Lyle, J., & Parker, E. B. (1961). Television in the lives of our children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Szalai, A. (1972). The use of time: Daily activities of urban and suburban populations in twelve countries. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  22. Weiss, W. (1969). Effects of mass media on communication. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 77–195). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  23. Wellman, B., Haase, A., Witte, J., Hampton, K., et al. (2001). Does the internet increase, decrease or supplement social capital? Social network, participation and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 437–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wright, C. R. (1986). Mass communication; a sociological perspective. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.International Organization for Migration-Migration Research & Training CentreGoyang-siSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations