Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 117, Issue 2, pp 541–559 | Cite as

Spatial Pattern of Urban Livability in Himalayan Region: A Case of Aizawl City, India

  • Benjamin L. SaitluangaEmail author
Article

Abstract

Cities are increasingly expected to provide impetus to the growth and development of their surrounding areas as well as to compete for economic activity with other cities. However, cities in developing countries are characterised by spatial differentiation and segregation due to widening inequality which are detrimental for growth and development of cities and regions. Concern over inequality in urban areas raises moral and ethical issues and demands compensatory and remedial policies to alleviate poorer places. This requires recognition of areas of relative deprivation at smaller scale through proper research. The present study is an attempt to find out patterns of inequality in livability in Aizawl-a fast growing hill city in the Himalayan region of northeastern India. Using data reduction method, levels of objective and subjective dimensions of livability are measured at neighbourhood level. The study found out that centrally located neighbourhoods are more livable in comparison to their peripheral counterparts. The study also found out that objective and subjective dimensions of livability have no significant relationship.

Keywords

Urban livability Neighbourhood inequality Principal component analysis Northeast India 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank the University Grants Commission (UGC), Government of India for financial assistance.

References

  1. Alreck, P. L., & Settle, R. B. (1995). The survey research handbook (2nd ed.). Chicago: Irwin.Google Scholar
  2. Andelman, R., Board, R., Carman, L., Cummins, R., Ferriss, A., Friedman, P., et al. (1998). Quality of life definition and terminology: A discussion document from the International Society of Quality of Life Studies (Monograph). Blacksburg: International Society of Quality of Life Studies.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, C. J. (2001). Analyzing quality-of-place. Environment and Planning B Planning and Design, 23, 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berry, B. J. L., & Baker, A. M. (1968). Geographic sampling. In B. J. L. Berry & D. F. Marble (Eds.), Spatial analysis (pp. 91–100). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Das, D. (2008). Urban quality of life: A case study of Guwahati. Social Indicators Research, 88(2), 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fakhruddin, M. (1991). Quality of urban life. Jaipur: Rawat Publication.Google Scholar
  7. Foo, T. S. (2000). Subjective assessment of urban quality of life in Singapore (1997–1998). Habitat International, 24(1), 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hall, T. (2006). Urban geography (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Ibrahim, M., & Chung, W. (2003). Quality of life of residents living near industrial estates in Singapore. Social Indicators Research, 61(2), 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kearns, A., Gibb, K., & Mackay, D. (2000). Area deprivation in Scotland: A new assessment. Urban Studies, 37(9), 1535–1559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kearns, G., & Philo, C. (Eds.). (1993). Selling places: The city as cultural capital, past and present. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kemp, D., Manicaros, M., Mullins, P., Simpson, R., Stimson, R., & Western, J. (1997). Urban metabolism: A framework for evaluating the viability, livability and sustainability of South East Queensland. Brisbane: The Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.Google Scholar
  13. Knox, P., & Pinch, S. (2010). Urban social geography: An introduction (6th ed.). London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  14. Leby, J. L., & Hashim, A. H. (2010). Liveability dimensions and attributes: Their relative importance in the eyes of neighbourhood residents. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 15(1), 67–91.Google Scholar
  15. Lee, Y. J. (2008). Subjective quality of life measurement in Taipei. Building and Environment, 43(7), 1205–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lennard, S., & Lennard, H. (1995). Livable cities observed. Southampton: Gondolier Press.Google Scholar
  17. Marans, R. W., & Stimson, R. J. (2011). An overview of quality of urban life. In R. W. Marans & R. J. Stimson (Eds.), Investigating quality of urban life (pp. 1–29). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McCann, E. J. (2007). Inequality and politics in the creative city-region: Questions of livability and state strategy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(1), 188–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Milbrath, L. W. (1979). Policy relevant quality of life research. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 444, 32–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morrison, N. (2003). Neighbourhoods and social cohesion: Experiences from Europe. International Planning Studies, 2(8), 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moudon, A. V., & Ryan, M. (1994). Reading the residential landscape. In S. J. Neary, M. S. Symes, & F. E. Brown (Eds.), The urban experience: A people-environment perspective (pp. 183–313). Suffolk: St Esmondsbury Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mozammel, A. M., Mridha, H., & Moore, G. T. (2011). The quality of life in Dhaka, Bangladesh: Neighborhood quality as a major component of residential satisfaction. In R. W. Marans & R. J. Stimson (Eds.), Investigating quality of urban life (pp. 251–272). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Myers, D. (1988). Building knowledge about quality of life for urban planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 54(3), 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. National Research Council (NRC). (2002). Community and quality of life: Data needs for informed decision making. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  25. Newman, P. W. G. (1999). Sustainability and cities: Extending the metabolism model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 44, 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oktay, D., & Rustemli, A. (2011). The quality of urban life and neighborhood satisfaction in Famagusta, Northern Cyprus. In R. W. Marans & R. J. Stimson (Eds.), Investigating quality of urban life (pp. 233–250). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Omuta, G. E. D. (1988). The quality of urban life and the perception of livability: A case study of neighbourhoods in Benin City Nigeria. Social Indicators Research, 20(4), 417–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pacione, M. (1990). Urban liveability: A review. Urban Geography, 11, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pacione, M. (1995). The geography of multiple deprivations in the clydeside conurbation. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 86(5), 407–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing-a social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Scott, A. J. (1998). Regions and the world economy: The coming shape of global production, competition, and political order. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, D. M. (1973). The geography of social well-being in the united states: An introduction to territorial social indicators. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, D. M. (1979). Where the grass is greener: Geographical perspectives on inequality. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  34. Tesfazghi, E. S., Martinez, J. A., & Verplanke, J. J. (2010). Variability of quality of life at small scales: Addis Ababa, Kirkos Sub-City. Social Indicators Research, 98, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Türkoğlu, H., Bölen, F., Baran, P. K., & Terzi, F. (2011). Measuring quality of urban life in Istanbul. In R. W. Marans & R. J. Stimson (Eds.), Investigating quality of urban life (pp. 209–232). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. UN-HABITAT (2003). Slums of the World: The face of urban poverty in the new millennium? Nairobi: UN-HABITAT.Google Scholar
  37. Van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., & Hollander, A. D. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well being-towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts: A literature study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geography and Resource ManagementMizoram UniversityAizawlIndia

Personalised recommendations