Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 116, Issue 3, pp 909–933 | Cite as

Parents Transmit Happiness Along with Associated Values and Behaviors to Their Children: A Lifelong Happiness Dividend?

  • Bruce HeadeyEmail author
  • Ruud Muffels
  • Gert G. Wagner
Article

Abstract

There are strong two-way links between parent and child happiness (life satisfaction), even for ‘children’ who have grown up, moved to their own home and partnered themselves. German panel evidence shows that transmission of (un)happiness from parents to children is partly due to transmission of values and behaviors known to be associated with happiness (Headey et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(42):17922–17926, 2010, in Soc Indic Res doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0079-8,2012). These values and behaviors include giving priority to pro-social and family values, rather than material values, maintaining a preferred balance between work and leisure, active social and community participation, and regular exercise. Both parents have about equal influence on the values and behaviors which children adopt. However, the life satisfaction of adult ‘children’ continues to be directly influenced by the life satisfaction of their mothers, with the influence of fathers being only indirect, via transmission of values and behaviors. There appears to be a lifelong happiness dividend (or unhappiness dividend) due to parenting. Structural equation models with two-way causation indicate that the life satisfaction of offspring can significantly affect the satisfaction of their parents, as well as vice versa, long after the ‘children’ have left home. Data come from 25 waves of the German Socio-Economic Panel Survey (SOEP 1984–2008). SOEP is the only panel survey worldwide in which data on life satisfaction have been obtained from parents and an adequate sub-sample of children no longer living in the parental home.

Keywords

Life satisfaction Inter-generational transmission German panel survey (SOEP) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Our thanks for valuable discussions about this paper to Alexander Wearing of Melbourne University, Stephen Headey of Monash University and Gisela Trommsdorff of the University of Konstanz. Thanks also to Simon Freiden and Markus Hahn of Melbourne Institute for assistance in preparing linked parent–child panel survey files.

References

  1. Aguche, A., & Trommsdorff, G. (2010). Transmission of well-being between mothers, fathers and adolescent children: The role of parenting and personality factors. In 9th international German socio-economic panel user conference, June 30–July 1.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argyle, M. (2001). The psychology of happiness (2nd ed.). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  4. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentler, P. M., & Freeman, E. H. (1983). Tests for stability in linear structural equation systems. Psychometrika, 48, 143–145.Google Scholar
  6. Bentler, P. M., & Raykov, T. (2000). On measures of explained variance in non-recursive structural equation models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Bookwala, J., & Schulz, R. (1996). Spousal similarity in subjective well-being: The cardiovascular health study. Psychology and Aging, 11, 582–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourgeois, M., & Friedkin, N. E. (2001). The distant core: Social solidarity, social distance and interpersonal ties in core-periphery structures. Social Networks, 23, 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  12. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. R. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, A. E., Diener, E., Georgellis, Y., & Lucas, R. E. (2008). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. Economic Journal, 118, 222–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influences of extroversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1991). The NEO PI-R. Odessa, FL: PAR.Google Scholar
  17. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2008). Happiness: Unlocking the mysteries of psychological wealth. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 25, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duncan, O. D., Haller, A. O., & Portes, A. (1968). Peer influences on aspirations: A reinterpretation. American Journal of Sociology, 74, 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319, 1687–1688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Emmons, R. A. (1986). Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1058–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 402–435.Google Scholar
  24. Frijters, P., Haisken-DeNew, J. P., & Shields, M. A. (2004). Money does matter! Evidence from increasing real incomes and life satisfaction in East Germany following reunification. American Economic Review, 94, 730–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set-point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholgy, 88, 158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gerlitz, J. -Y., & Schupp, J. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten Persoenlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP. http://www.diw.de/deutsche/produkte/publikationen/researchnotes/docs/papers/rn4.pdf. Accessed 12 April 2012.
  27. Gottman, J., & Declaire, J. (1998). Raising an emotionally intelligent child. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  28. Greene, W. H. (2008). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  29. Guven, C., Senik, C., & Stichnoth, H. (2010). You can’t be happier than your wife: Happiness gaps and divorce. SOEP Paper, 261. Google Scholar
  30. Harlow, R. E., & Cantor, N. (1996). Still participating after all these years: A study of life task participation in later life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1235–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Headey, B. (1987). The subjective well-being and ill-being of families. In D. Tait (Ed.), Family well-being (pp. 14–18). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar
  32. Headey, B. W. (2008). Life goals matter to happiness: A revision of set-point theory. Social Indicators Research, 86, 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Headey, B. W., Muffels, R. J. A., & Wagner, G. G. (2010). Long-running German panel survey shows that personal and economic choices, not just genes, matter for happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(42), 17922–17926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Headey, B. W., Muffels, R. J.A., & Wagner, G. G. (2012). Choices which change life satisfaction: Similar results for Australia, Britain and Germany. Social Indicators Research (24 May), 1–24. Published online. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0079-8.
  35. Headey, B. W., Warren, D., & Harding, G. (2005). Changes in marital status 2001–2003; and satisfaction levels just before separation in families, incomes and jobs: A statistical report of the HILDA survey. Melbourne: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.Google Scholar
  36. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1986). LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
  37. Kasser, T., & Kanner, A. D. (Eds.). (2004). Psychology and consumer culture: The struggle for the good life in a materialistic world. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  38. Kessler, R. C., & Greenberg, D. F. (1981). Linear panel analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Kind, M., & Haisken-DeNew, J. P. (2010). Unexpected victims—how parents’ unemployment affects their children’s life satisfaction. In 9th international German socio-economic panel user conference. Google Scholar
  40. Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston, Illinois: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
  41. Little, I. M. D. (2002). A critque of welfare economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Lucas, R. E. (2008). Personality and subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 171–194). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). The how of happiness: A scientific approach to getting the life you want. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  44. Nickerson, C., Schwarz, N., Diener, E., & Kahneman, D. (2003). Zeroing in on the dark side of the American dream: A closer look at the negative consequences of the goal for financial success. Psychological Science, 14, 531–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ostwald, S. K., Godwin, K. M., & Cron, S. G. (2009). Predictors of life satisfaction in stroke survivors and their caregivers after inpatient rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Nursing, 34, 160–174.Google Scholar
  46. Powdthavee, N. (2008) I can’t smile without you: Spousal correlation in life satisfaction. York University, Department of Economics, Discussion Paper 08/16.Google Scholar
  47. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  48. Roberts, B. W., Walton, K., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 3–27.Google Scholar
  49. Schimmack, U., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Environmental influences on well-being: A dyadic latent panel analysis of spousal similarity. Social Indicators Research, 98, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scollon, C. N., & Diener, E. (2006). Love, work and changes in extroversion and neuroticism over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1152–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. STATA. (2011). Structural equation modeling reference manual. College Station, Texas: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  52. Thoits, P. A., & Hewitt, L. N. (2001). Volunteer work and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42, 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2007). The German socio-economic panel study (SOEP)—scope, evolution and enhancements. Schmoellers Jahrbuch, 127(1), 139–169.Google Scholar
  54. Winkelmann, R. (2004) Subjective well-being and the family: Results from an ordered probit model with multiple random effects. IZA DP No. 1016.Google Scholar
  55. Winkelmann, L., & Winkelmann, R. (1995). Happiness and unemployment: A panel data analysis for Germany. Konjuncturpolitik, 41, 283–307.Google Scholar
  56. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social ResearchUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  2. 2.School of Social and Behavioral Sciences and ReflecT Labor Market Research InstituteTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands
  3. 3.DIWBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations