The Concept, Dimensions and Methods of Assessment of Human Well-Being within a Socioecological Context: A Literature Review
- First Online:
- 2k Downloads
The concept of well-being has evolved over the past several decades as research has continued to reveal its multidimensional, dynamic, person-specific and culture-specific nature. Most recently, the ecological embeddedness of well-being has also gained recognition, and this development of the concept demands that we explore and identify new conceptual frameworks and appropriate methodological approaches towards the assessment of quality of life within a socioecological context. This paper offers a review of seminal and current research in the fields of social indicators, human development, ecological economics, and natural resources management, with the aim of examining the concept and the various methodologies designed to assess both the objective and subjective components and the multiple dimensions that comprise well-being. We also present some methodological approaches that have the capacity to account for the role of ecosystem services, considering several studies of rural populations whose well-being depends on the flow of ecosystem services, highlighting the participatory methods these studies employed to identify and assess locally relevant well-being indicators, and addressing some of the challenges inherent in such methods. We conclude with an appraisal of what we regard as the most appropriate methodological approach for measuring human well-being in the socioecological context.
KeywordsWell-being Quality of life Socioecological system Millennium ecosystem assessment Participatory methods Indicators
- Abdallah, S., Michaelson, J., Shah, S., Stoll, L., & Marks, N. (2012). The Happy Planet Index: 2012 Report. A global index of sustainable well-being. London, UK. www.happyplanetindex.org. Accessed 07 January 2013.
- Bauer, R. A. (1966). Social indicators. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (1998). Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. In F. Berkes & C. Folke (Eds.), Linking social and ecological systems (pp. 1–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
- Bradbury, H., & Reason, P. (2001). Conclusion: Broadening the bandwidth of validity: Issues and choice-points for improving the quality of action research. In H. Bradbury & P. Reason (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 343–351). London: Sage Publications Limited.Google Scholar
- Busch, M., Gee, K., Burkhard, B., Lange, M., & Stelljes, N. (2011). Conceptualizing the link between marine ecosystem services and human well-being: The case of offshore wind farming. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 7(3), 190–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Camfield, L., & McGregor, J. A. (2005). Resilience and wellbeing in developing countries. In M. Ungar (Ed.), Handbook for working with children and youth: pathways to resilience across cultures and contexts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundations.Google Scholar
- Chambers, R., & Conway, G. R. (1992) Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS Discussion Paper 296, Brighton: Institute for Development Studies (IDS).Google Scholar
- Cobb, C., & Rixford, C. (1998). Lessons learned from the history of social indicators. San Francisco: Redefining Progress. http://rprogress.org/publications/1998/SocIndHist.pdf. Accessed 07 January 2013.
- Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Diener, E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, November 2012, 590–597.Google Scholar
- Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Research Group on Wellbeing in Developing Countries [WeD]. (2007). Wellbeing and International Development. Bath, UK: Economic and Social Research Council. Retrieved 30 November 2012, from http://www.welldev.org.uk/research/aims.htm.
- Fraser, E. D. G., Dougill, A. J., Mabee, W. E., Reed, M., & McAlpine, P. (2006). Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 78(2), 114–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gasper, D. (2004). Human well-being: Concepts and conceptualizations (No. 2004/06). WIDER Discussion Papers, United Nations University. Retrieved on 01 March 2013, from http://hdl.handle.net/10419/52803on01.
- Gough, I. (1998). What are human needs? In J. Franklin (Ed.), Social policy and social justice (pp. 50–56). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Green, L. W., George, M. A., Daniel, M., Frankish, C. J., Herbert, C. J., Bowie, W. R., et al. (1995). Study of participatory research in health promotion. Review and Recommendations for Development of Participatory Research in Health Promotion in Canada. Ottawa: The Royal Society of Canada.Google Scholar
- International Institute for Sustainable Development (2012). Sustainable Development Timeline. Retrieved on 15 March 2013, from http://www.iisd.org/publications/pub.aspx?pno=764.
- International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). (1980). World Conservation Strategy: Living resource conservation for sustainable development. Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar
- Johnson, S. (2012). UNEP, The first 40 Years: A narrative. United Nations Environmental Programme. Retrieved on 10 March 2013, from http://www.unep.org/40thanniversary/.
- Lavers, T. (2007). Asking people what they want or telling them what they need? Contrasting a theory of human need with local expressions of goals (WeD Working Paper 28). Bath, UK: ESRC Research Group on Wellbeing in Developing Countries (WeD), University of Bath. Retrieved on 10 March 2013, from http://www.welldev.org.uk/research/working.htm.
- Maggino, F., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Measuring the quality of life and the construction of social indicators. In: K. C. Land, A. C. Michalos & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 201–238). Springer, Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2421-1_10.
- Marks, N., Simms, A., Thompson, S., & Abdallah, S. (2006). The happy planet index: An index of human well-being and environmental impact. London: New Economics Foundation.Google Scholar
- Max-Neef, M. A. (1991). Human Scale Development: Conception, application and further reflections. New York: The Apex Press.Google Scholar
- McGillivray, M., & Clarke, M. (2006). Understanding human wellbeing. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
- Morris, M. D. (1979). Measuring the condition of the world’s poor: The physical quality of life index. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- New Economics Foundation (NEF). (2005). Well-Being and the Environment: Achieving “One Planet Living” and maintaining quality of life. London, UK.Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1976). Measuring social well-being: A progress report on the development of social indicators. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2001). The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- Pereira, E., Queiroz, C., Pereira, H. M., & Vicente, L. (2005). Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being: A participatory study in a mountain community in Portugal. Ecology and Society 10(2): 14. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art14/. Accessed 07 January 2013.
- Pinedo-Vasquez, M. A., & Sears, R. R. (2011). Várzea forests: Multifunctionality as a resource for conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. In M. Pinedo-Vasquez, M. L. Ruffino, C. Padoch, & E. S. Brondízio (Eds.), The Amazon Várzea: The decade past and the decade ahead (pp. 187–206). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper, 27. Institute of Development Studies (IDS): Sussex, UK.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. K. (1985b). The Standard of Living (The Tanner Lectures). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Streeten, P., Burki, S. J., ul Huq, M., Hicks, N., & Stewart, F. (1981). First things first; meeting basic human needs in developing countries. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2011). Human development reports: Indices & data–human development index (HDI). http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/hdi/. Accessed on 12 December 2012.
- Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on earth. Gabriola Island: New Society.Google Scholar